248
Vol. 61, No. 2
Chart 4. Synthesis of (2R,3R,4R)-2-Amino-3-hydroxy-4,5-dimethylhex-
anoic Acid (2)
Fig. 2. NOE Experiment of 16
6.8Hz), 2.77 (1H, dd, J=9.6, 13.2Hz), 3.29 (1H, dd, J=3.2, (3H, d, J=6.8Hz), 1.05 (3H, d, J=6.8Hz), 1.98 (1H, octet, J=
13.2Hz), 3.60 (1H, quint., J=6.8Hz), 4.14–4.70 (2H, m), 4.67 6.8Hz), 2.44 (1H, quint., J=6.8Hz), 3.49 (2H, s), 3.74 (3H, s);
(1H, m), 7.21–7.35 (5H, m),; 13C-NMR (100MHz, CDCl3) δ: 13C-NMR (keto form, 100MHz, CDCl3) δ: 12.3, 18.5, 21.2,
13.8, 18.6, 21.2, 30.6, 37.9, 43.5, 55.5, 65.9, 127.3, 128.9, 129.4, 29.9, 48.1, 52.2, 53.0, 167.7, 206.5; HR-MS (ESI-TOF) Calcd
135.4, 153.1, 177.1; HR-MS (ESI-TOF) Calcd for C16H22NO3 for C9H16NaO3 [M+Na]+ 195.0997, Found 195.0994.
[M+H]+ 276.1600, Found 276.1588.
(R)-2-Hydroxyimino-4,5-dimethyl-3-oxo-hexanoic Acid
(R)-2,3-Dimethyl-butyric Acid (4) To a solution of 8a Methyl Ester (13) To a stirred solution of β-ketoester 9
(2.47g, 10.9mmol) in THF–H2O (1:1, 50mL) at 23°C was (270mg, 1.57mmol) in AcOH (4mL) at 0°C was added a
added LiOH H2O (684mg, 16.3mmol) followed by a 30% NaNO2 solution (325mg, 4.7mmol, in 4mL water). After
H2O2 solution (2.2mL, 20mmol). After stirring the mix- stirring the mixture at 23°C for 2h, the reaction mixture
ture at 23°C for 6h, the reaction mixture was acidified with was quenched with a satd NaHCO3 solution and extracted
a 1m KHSO4 solution (25mL) and extracted with EtOAc with EtOAc (100mL×2). The combined organic layers were
(150 m L×2). The combined organic layers were washed with washed with a satd NaHCO3 solution and brine, dried over
brine, dried over Na2SO4, and concentrated in vacuo to give Na2SO4, and concentrated in vacuo to give the crude product.
a colorless residue. The crude product was purified by silica The crude product was purified by silica gel column chroma-
gel column chromatography (n-hexane–EtOAc=4:1) to give tography (n-hexane–EtOAc=4:1) to give 13 (249mg, 80%)
4 (1.02g, 81%) as a colorless oil: [α]D20 −22.3 (c=0.74, CHCl3); as a colorless oil: [α]D20 −16.1 (c=3.85, CHCl3); IR (neat) ν
1
1H-NMR (400MHz, CDCl3) δ: 0.93 (3H, d, J=6.8Hz), 0.97 3342, 2963, 2875, 1731, 1677, 1435, 1292, 1212cm−1; H-NMR
(3H, d, J=6.8Hz), 1.13 (3H, d, J=6.8Hz), 1.95 (1H, octet, (400MHz, CDCl3) δ: 0.89 (3H, d, J=6.8Hz), 0.92 (3H, d,
J=6.8Hz), 2.27 (1H, quintet, J=6.8Hz); 13C-NMR (100MHz, J=6.8Hz), 1.07 (3H, d, J=6.8Hz), 2.02 (1H, octet, J=6.8Hz),
CDCl3) δ: 13.3, 18.9, 20.6, 30.7, 46.0, 182.9. The spectroscopic 3.21 (1H, quint., J=6.8Hz), 3.91 (3H, s), 9.13–9.32 (1H,
data for 4 were consistent with those of the literature.27)
brs); 13C-NMR (100MHz, CDCl3) δ: 12.8, 18.9, 21.2, 30.6,
(R)-4,5-Dimethyl-3-oxo-hexanoic Acid Methyl Ester (9) 46.8, 52.8, 150.6, 162.1, 200.0; HR-MS (ESI-TOF) Calcd for
To a stirred solution of carboxylic acid 4 (423mg, 3.64mmol) C9H15NNaO4 [M+Na]+ 224.0899, Found 224.0892.
in THF (50mL) was added carbonyldiimidazole (885mg,
5.46mmol) at 23°C. After stirring the mixture for 6h, the re- drochloride (3)
Methyl (4R)-2-Amino-4,5-dimethyl-3-oxohexanoate Hy-
suspension of oxime 13 (210mg,
A
action mixture was quenched with water (50mL) and extract- 1.04mmol), 2m HCl–MeOH (1.6mL, 3.2mmol), and 2.8
ed with EtOAc (50mL×2). The combined organic layers were wt% Pd–C (40mg, 0.01mmol) in MeOH (5mL) was stirred
washed with brine, dried over Na2SO4, and concentrated in under hydrogen atmosphere (1atm) at 23°C for 6h. The reac-
vacuo to give the crude imidazolide as a colorless oil. A sus- tion mixture was filtered through a celite pad and the filtrate
pension of potassium methyl malonate (1.1g, 7.0mmol), pow- was concentrated in vacuo to give 3 (232mg, quant. as a
dered MgCl2 (666mg, 7.0mmol), and Et3N (2mL, 14mmol) 1:1 mixture of diastereomers) as a colorless solid: [α]D20 17.1
in THF (35mL) was stirred at 23°C for 2h. The crude im- (c=1.20, MeOH); mp 123–125°C; IR (neat) ν 2962, 2875,
idazolide (499mg, 3.0mmol) and DMAP (37mg, 0.3mmol) 2624, 1752, 1726, 1585, 1508, 1439, 1369, 1277, 1139cm−1;
were added at 23°C and the reaction mixture was stirred for 1H-NMR (1:1 diastereomers, 400MHz, CDCl3) δ: 0.80 (3H,
48h. The reaction was quenched with a satd NH4Cl solution d, J=6.8Hz), 0.87 (3H, d, J=6.8Hz), 0.90 (3H, d, J=6.8Hz),
(25mL) and extracted with EtOAc (50mL×2). The combined 1.01 (6H, d, J=6.4Hz), 1.20 (3H, d, J=7.2Hz), 1.93–2.02 (1H,
organic layers were washed with a satd NaHCO3 solution and m), 2.15–2.23 (1H, m), 2.85–2.92 (1H, m), 2.98–3.05 (1H, m),
brine, dried over Na2SO4, and concentrated in vacuo to give 3.88 (3H, s), 3.91 (3H, s), 5.30 (1H, s), 5.38 (1H, s); 13C-NMR
the crude product. The crude product was purified by silica (1:1 diastereomers 100MHz, CDCl3) δ: 11.1, 14.4, 17.9, 18.9,
gel column chromatography (n-hexane–EtOAc=4:1) to give 21.1, 21.3, 29.3, 30.3, 49.5, 50.6, 54.1, 54.4, 61.2, 61.4, 163.3,
9 (583mg, 93% as a 78:22 mixture of keto and enol tauto- 163.5, 201.4; HR-MS (ESI-TOF) Calcd for C9H18NO3 [M+H]+
mers) as a colorless oil: [α]D20 −23.9 (c=0.8, CHCl3); IR (neat) 188.1287, Found 188.1315.
ν 2961, 2875, 2138, 1716, 1655, 1309, 1210cm−1; 1H-NMR
(keto form, 400MHz, CDCl3) δ: 0.87 (3H, d, J=6.8Hz), 0.94 anoate Hydrochloride (14) Ru-(R)-BINAP complex was
Methyl (2R,3R,4R)-2-Amino-3-hydroxy-4,5-dimethylhex-