ORGANIC
LETTERS
2013
Vol. 15, No. 10
2530–2533
Thermally Controlled Decarboxylative
[4 þ 2] Cycloaddition between
Alkoxyoxazoles and Acrylic Acid:
Expedient Access to 3‑Hydroxypyridines
Laurie-Anne Jouanno, Vincent Tognetti, Laurent Joubert, Cyrille Sabot,* and
Pierre-Yves Renard*
ꢀ
Normandie Universite, COBRA, UMR 6014 & FR 3038; Universite Rouen;
INSA Rouen; CNRS, 1 rue Tesniere 76821 Mont-Saint-Aignan, Cedex, France
ꢀ
ꢁ
cyrille.sabot@univ-rouen.fr; pierre-yves.renard@univ-rouen.fr
Received April 12, 2013
ABSTRACT
A modified Kondrat’eva cycloaddition involving an unprecedented thermally controlled metal-free decarboxylative aromatization affords an
expedient access to natural 3-hydroxypyridine/piperidine systems.
The development of rapid, convergent, and economical
approaches to heterocyclic ring systems from environmen-
tally friendly and easily accessible reagents is a challenging
problem of current interest. Among them, 3-hydroxypyr-
idines have attracted particular attention due to their
broad spectrum of biological activity such as bronchodila-
tion (pirbuterol, trade name Maxair), human phosphory-
lated acetylcholinesterase (AChE) reactivation,1 AChE
inhibition,2 and potent antioxidant activity (N-tocopherol).3
Apart from these important biologically active chemicals,
3-hydroxypyridines also proved to be valuable key
intermediates to access natural products as, for example, the
tricyclic pyrido[4,3-b]indolizine pterocellin A4 or abundant
3-hydroxypiperidine alkaloids such as (ꢀ)-deoxocassine or
recently isolated microgrewiapine A.5 In addition, pyridinyl
hydroxyl groups afford further functionalization opportunity
through, for instance, CꢀC bond formation via palladium or
nickel chemistry.6
However, surprisingly few straightforward methods to
access 3-hydroxypyridine scaffolds are reported in the
literature.7 Most of them suffer from different drawbacks
such as the reaction conditions (expensive metal catalysts,
long reaction times) and long synthetic approaches (stepwise
(5) (a) Hasseberg, H.-A.; Gerlach, H. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1989, 255–
ꢀ
261. (b) Still, P. C.; Yi, B.; Gonzalez-Cestari, T. F.; Pan, L.; Pavlovicz,
R. E.; Chai, H.-B.; Ninh, T. N.; Li, C.; Soejarto, D. D.; McKay, D. B.;
Kinghorn, A. D. J. Nat. Prod. 2013, 76, 243–249.
(6) For an example, see: Tu, T.; Mao, H.; Herbert, C.; Xu, M.; Dotz,
€
K. H. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 7796–7798.
(7) (a) Lu, J.-Y.; Arndt, H.-D. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 4205–4212. (b)
(1) Mercey, G.; Verdelet, T.; Saint-Andre, G.; Gillon, G.; Wagner,
A.; Baati, R.; Jean, L.; Nachon, N.; Renard, P.-Y. Chem. Commun.
2011, 47, 5295–5297.
(2) Francisco, W.; Pivatto, M.; Danuello, A.; Regasini, L. O.; Bacci-
ni, L. R.; Young, M. C. M.; Lopes, N. P.; Lopes, J. L. C.; Bolzani, V. S.
J. Nat. Prod. 2012, 75, 408–413.
€
Lu, J.-Y.; Keith, J. A.; Shen, W.-Z.; Schurmann, M.; Preut, H.; Jacob, T.;
Arndt, H.-D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 13219–13221. (c) Yoshida, K.;
Kawagoe, F.; Hayashi, K.; Horiuchi, S.; Imamoto, T.; Yanagisawa, A.
Org. Lett. 2008, 11, 515–518. (d) Lei, C.-H.; Wang, D.-X.; Zhao, L.; Zhu,
J.; Wang, M.-X. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 4708–4711.
ꢀ
ꢀ
(8) Mongin, F.; Trecourt, F.; Gervais, B.; Mongin, O.; Queguiner, G.
(3) Nam, T.; Rector, C. L.; Kim, H.; Sonnen, A. F. P.; Meyer, R.;
Nau, W. N.; Atkinson, J.; Rintoul, J.; Pratt, D. A.; Porter, N. A. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 10211–10219.
(4) O’Malley, M. M.; Damkaci, F.; Kelly, T. R. Org. Lett. 2006, 8,
2651–2652.
J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 3272–3276.
(9) (a) Kondrat’eva, G. Y. Khim. Nauka Prom-st 1957, 2, 666. (b)
Lalli, C.; Bouma, M. J.; Bonne, D.; Masson, G.; Zhu, J. Chem.;Eur. J.
2011, 17, 880–889. (c) Sabot, C.; Oueis, E.; Brune, X.; Renard, P.-Y.
Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 768–770.
r
10.1021/ol4010195
Published on Web 05/06/2013
2013 American Chemical Society