432
F. Mostaghni et al. / Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy 110 (2013) 430–436
and solvents were removed by film evaporation that gave an oily
residual. The crude product was chromatographed on a silica gel,
eluents dichloromethane/ethyl acetate (9:1) and (5:1)] which gave
an essentially pure Z isomer (yield, 50%).
Quantum mechanical calculations
All calculations were carried out using the Gaussian 09 quan-
tum chemistry package and Gaussian Viewer as graphical medium.
DFT calculations were performed by using the three parameter
Becke 3LYP functional, which is a hybrid of exact (Hartree-Fock)
exchange terms and gradient-corrected exchange and correlation
terms, similar to that first suggested by Becke. The usual 6-31Gꢁ
basis set was employed in the DFT calculations. Following the stan-
dard nomenclature the latter calculation will be referred to as
B3LYP/6-31Gꢁ.
Finally, the calculated normal mode vibrational frequencies,
NMR and thermodynamic properties were also calculated with
the same method of calculations. Calculated results extracted man-
ually and by using Chemcraft software version 1.6. The computed
results have been compared with the experimental data.
1HNMR (CDCl3): d 3.929 (3H, s, OCH3), 3.948 (3H, s, OCH3),
3.961 (3H, s, OCH3), 3.969 (3H, OCH3), 6.93–7.39 (7H, m, vinyl,
H–Ar), 9.89 (1H, s, COOH). 13CNMR(CDCl3): d 56.66 (OCH3), 56.69
(OCH3), 61.35 (OCH3), 67.75 (OCH3), 107–154 (Ar), 171.75 (C@C),
173.50 (C@C), 191.70 (COOH).
Erythro-2-(2-methoxyphenoxy)-1-(3, 4, 5-trimethoxyphenyl)-1, 3-
propanediol (3a)
Acid 1 (1.2 mmol, 0.5 g) was dissolved in THF (13 ml) in a
100 ml flask and 2 M borane-dimethyl sulfide complex in THF
(5 ml) was injected into the flask with a syringe during 15 min
(nitrogen atmosphere and magnetic stirring). The reaction mixture
was kept at 35 °C for 2 h. Excess of reagents was decomposed by
the addition of (1 ml) H2O. Then H2O2 (1 ml 30% H2O2) and NaOH
3 M (3 ml) was added over a 30 min period. The reaction mixture
was stirred vigorously at 35 °C for 3 h period and transferred to a
separatory funnel with 30 ml H2O and 30 ml CHCl3. The layers
were separated and the aqueous layer extracted with 2 ꢃ 50 ml
CHCl3. The organic layers were combined and dried over Na2SO4
and the solvent was removed by film evaporation. The product
crystallized on standing. Recrystallization from ethyl acetate
yielded crystals yellow needles (yield, 75%).
Results and discussion
Procedure of easy and stereo selective synthesize of lignin mod-
el compounds 3a and 3b is shown in two steps on Scheme 1.
The products obtained according to previous studies was a mix-
ture of the two possible diastereomers erythro and threo forms.
Pure erythro and threo forms of arylglcerol b-aryl ethers could be
isolated forms of reduction products by chromatography on SiO2
followed by ion-exchange chromatography [15–20].
IR (KBr): 3445 (b), 2931 (m), 2850 (w), 1574 (s), 1516 (s), 1467
(s), 1426 (s), 1364 (s), 1333 (vs), 1267 (m), 1204 (vs), 1119 (vs),
1035 (w). 1HNMR (CDCl3): d 2.04 (3H, s, CH3CO), 2.09, (3H, s, CH3-
CO), 3.89 (3H, s, OCH3), 3.93 (6H, s, OCH3), 3.94 (3H, s, OCH3), 4.25
In this work the intermediate unsaturated acids 2a and 2b were
obtained in a pure crystalline state. We used hexamethyldisilazane
with no
a-proton, as base in condensation step. This preclude of
secondary reactions and increase the yield of the condensation
step and a diastereoisomeric control can occur using a more steri-
cally crowded enolate that create Z-isomer of propionic acids (2a,
2b). The product obtained on hydroboration of compound 2 was
identified as the erythro form of compounds. Since hydroboration
is known to proceed by syn addition.
The phenolic model Erythro-1-(4-Hydroxy-3,5-dimethoxy-
phenyl)-2-(2-methoxyphenoxy)-1,3-propanediol (3b) was syn-
thesised using the tetrahydropyran-2-yl ether of syringaldehyde
and (2-methoxyphenoxy) acetic acid. No separate deprotection
step was required since removal of the tetrahydropyran-2-yl group
occurred spontaneously during the reaction of tetrahydropyran-2-yl
(1H, dd, J = 3.6 and 11.9 Hz, Hc), 4.39 (1H, dd, J = 5.8 and 11.9 Hz,
Hc), 4.58 (1H, m, Hb), 6.05 (1H, d, J = 4.8, Ha), 6.84 (2H, s, H–Ar)
6.87–6.99 (4H, m, Ar–H). Mass (CDCl3): m/e (%); (M)+ 364 (0.4),
344(9), 239 (14.6), 195 (100), 167 (5.3), 124 (10.8), 109 (15.46).
Tetrahydropyran-2-yl ether of syringaldehyde
Syringaldehyde was derivativsed essentially according to a
method for the preparation of tetra hydro pyran-2-yl ethers of
alcohols [21]. (yield, 75%).
1HNMR(CDCl3): d 1.64 (2H, m), 1.84 (2H, m), 2.02 (2H, m), 3.95
(3H, s,OCH3), 3.98 (3H, s, OCH3), 4.24 (2H, m), 5.64(1H, d, J = 7.5),
7.15 (2H, s, Ar–H) 9.83 (1H, s).
ether of syringaldehyde with
a
-lithiated 1 (or during the work-up
Erythro-1-(4-Hydroxy-3,5-dimethoxyphenyl)-2-(2-
methoxyphenoxy)-1,3-propanediol (3b)
2
The above procedure for the synthesis of arylglycerol-b-guaia-
cyl ethers was followed using tetrahydropyran-2-yl ether of
syringaldehyde as the primary material, but instead of 3 M HCl,
the equivalent amounts of 2 M H2SO4 were used for acidification
and the reaction mixture was exposed to acid conditions for about
1 h during the workup procedure. Purification of crude product by
flash chromatography using mixtures of methylene chloride and
ethyl acetate as eluents gave essentially pure 2b (yield, 37%).
Reduction of acid 2b with boran-dimethylsulfide complex gave
an essentially pure product 3b (yield 72%).
Li [N(SiMe3)2]
O
CH2
(Li)2
O
CH2
COOH
COOH
OMe
OMe
1
CHO
O
C
COOH
H
R1
R3
OMe
R2
C
R2
R1
IR (KBr): 3424 (s), 2932 (m), 2850 (w), 1575 (s), 1518 (s), 1467
(s), 1426 (s), 1366 (s), 1333 (vs), 1267 (m), 1204 (vs), 1119 (vs),
CH2OH
2
1034 (w). 1HNMR (DMSO): d 3.624 (2H, m, H
c
), 3.76 (3H, s,
OCH3), 3.80 (6H, s, OCH3), 4.276 (1H, m, Hb),4.57 (1H, t,
J = 5.6 Hz, OH ), 4. 72 (1H, t, J = 4.8 Hz, ), 5.26 (1H, d,
J = 4.8 Hz, OH ), 6.53 (2H, s, H–Ar), 6.81-6.90 (4H, m, H–Ar),
8.306 (Ar–OH). 13CNMR (DMSO): d 55.77 (OCH3), 56.26 (OCH3),
56.26 (OCH3), 61.22 (C ), 65.58 (C ), 71.33 (Cb), 103.80 (A2),
R3
H
H
C
C
O
B
OH
c
Ha
MeO
1) BH3.S(CH3)
2
2) H2O2 / NaOH
a
A
R3
3
(a) R1=R2=R3=OMe
(b) R1=R3=OMe, R2=OH
R1
c
a
103.80 (A6), 111.77(B2), 114.70 (B5), 121.10 (B6), 121.96 (B1),
132.09 (A1), 134.11 (A4), 147.10 (A3), 147.10 (A5), 148.01 (B4),
149.69 (B3).
R2
Scheme 1. Stereo selective synthesize of lignin model compounds 3a and 3b.