Table 1. Screening Studies for Directing Groups
Scheme 1. Selective Alkenylation Using Directing Groups
3 (%)a
4 (%)b
entry
indole
(C2-product)
(C7-product)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
R = ÀH
nd
nd
nd
nd
nd
nd
12
nd
R = ÀCH3
nd
R = ÀCOCH3
R = ÀCO(CH3)3
R = ÀCO(CH3)3
R = ÀCOPh
46
trace
trace
66
R = ÀSO2C7H8
trace
a Conversion based on 1H NMR data. b nd = not detected.
the C2-position is less addressed.12,13 Alkenylation of
1-acylindoles has been explored as early as 1983 by Itahara
and co-workers13a by using Pd(II), which led to sub-
stitution at the C3-position (Scheme 1a). Furthermore,
Gaunt et al. reported C2-alkenylation of indoles using
Pd catalysts by altering the solvent to obtain C2- or
C3-alkenylated products in low to moderate yields.13b
preliminary studies indicated the suitability of N-acetylin-
dole, as it reacted with methyl acrylate to furnish the C2-
coupled product 3ea in 46% yield (entry 3, Table 1). We
anticipated that increasing the electron-donating ability of
substrates may increase the reactivity and, therefore, used
N-tert-butoylindole and N-Boc-indole for the reaction
with methyl acrylate (2a) under identical reaction condi-
tions. However, these reactions furnished trace amounts of
the anticipated C2-alkenylated products (entries 4 and 5,
Table 1). Very gratifyingly, when N-benzoylindole was
treated with methyl acrylate, the expected C2-substituted
product 3aa was obtained in 66% yield (entry 6, Table 1). It
is notable that the reaction of anilides with methyl acrylates
in similar conditions resulted in the alkenylation of anilides
at the ortho-position (Scheme 1c),17 and it is well-known
that the reaction of N-benzoylindole with methyl acrylate
(2a) inthe presenceof Pd catalyst results in the formation of
the C3-alkenylated product (Scheme 1a).13a Furtherscreen-
ing studies revealed that a sulfonyl protecting group
and simple indole and N-methyl indole were not suitable
substrates, as no reaction occurred even after prolonged
reaction times (entries 1, 2, and 7, Table 1). We anticipated
that Pd also could mimic the role of Ru, and we explored
the same reaction with Pd(II) instead of Ru(II). However,
this substitution resulted in the mixture of C2- and
C3-alkenylated products in low yields (see Supporting
Information, SI-Table 1).
Recently, Arrayas, Carretero and co-workers13c employed
ꢀ
N-pyridylsulfonyl as a directing group to functionalize indole
at the C2-position using an excess of alkenes in the presence
of a Pd(II) catalyst (Scheme 1b). The concept was based
on the ability of Pd to form six-membered palladacycles.14
Other than the N-pyridylsulfonyl group, there have been no
attempts to use other directing groups to alkenylate indole at
the C2-position. With this background and previous reports
on Ru-based catalysts,15 we hypothesized that the Ru(II)
catalyst could perform a selective C2-alkenylation of indole
using a carbonyl oxygen as a directing group. Moreover, a
C2-directing ability of Ru(II) would be favorable, as there are
a number of reports on Ru(II) forming five-membered cyclic
intermediates.16
To test this hypothesis, we started an investigation to
find a suitable directing group, which could promote
selective alkenylation of indole at the C2-position. Our
(12) Capito, E.; Brown, J. M.; Ricci, A. Chem. Commun. 2005, 1854.
(13) (a) Itahara, T.; Ikeda, M.; Sakakibara, T. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 1 1983, 1361. (b) Grimster, N. P.; Gauntlett, C.; Godfrey,
C. R. A.; Gaunt, M. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 3125. (c)
ꢀ
ꢀ
Garcıa-Rubia, A.; Gomez Arrayas, R.; Carretero, J. C. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 6511. (d) Kandukuri, S. R.; Schiffner, J. A.; Oestreich,
M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 1265.
With the benzoyl group as a suitable directing group,
we continued screening studies to determine the optimal
amounts of the catalyst (Ru), activator (Ag), and oxidant
(Cu) required for this reaction. N-Benzoyl indole (1a) and
methyl acrylate (2a) were used as model substrates in the
presenceof [Ru(p-cymene)Cl2]2 asa catalyst, AgSbF6 asan
ꢀ
ꢀ
(14) Garcıa-Rubia, A.; Urones, B.; Gomez Arrayas, R.; Carretero,
J. C. Chem.;Eur. J. 2010, 16, 9676.
(15) Reviews and selected publications of ruthenium catalyzed func-
tionalization: (a) Arockiam, P. B.; Bruneau, C.; Dixneuf, P. H. Chem.
Rev. 2012, 112, 5879. (b) Kakiuchi, F.; Murai, S. Acc. Chem. Res. 2002,
35, 826. (c) Singh, K. S.; Dixneuf, P. H. Organometallics 2012, 31, 7320.
(d) Arockiam, P. B.; Fischmeister, C.; Bruneau, C.; Dixneuf, P. H. Green
Chem. 2011, 13, 3075.
(16) (a) Kozhushkov, S. I.; Ackermann, L. Chem. Sci. 2013, 4,
886. (b) Ackermann, L. Acc. Chem. Res. 201310.1021/ar3002798. (c)
Ackermann, L.; Pospech, J. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 4153. (d) Ackermann, L.;
Wang, L.; Wolfram, R.; Lygin, A. V. Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 728. (e) Padala,
K.; Jeganmohan, M. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 6144. (f) Padala, K.; Jeganmohan,
M. Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 1134. (g) Li, B.; Devaraj, K.; Darcel, C.; Dixneuf,
P. H. Green Chem. 2012, 14, 2706.
activator, and Cu(OAc)2 H2O as an oxidant in a variety
of solvents and different temperatures. The reaction of 1a
with 2a in the presence of Ru(II) (5 mol %), AgSbF6
3
(17) (a) Hashimoto, Y.; Ortloff, T.; Hirano, K.; Satoh, T.; Bolm, C.;
Miura, M. Chem. Lett. 2012, 41, 151. (b) Ackermann, L.; Wang, L.;
Wolfram, R.; Lygin, A. V. Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 728.
B
Org. Lett., Vol. XX, No. XX, XXXX