with gaseous SO2 to yield an arylsulfinate, which subse-
quently was oxidized to the desired sulfonyl chloride (2)
with N-chlorosuccinimide (NCS) at room temperature in
dichloromethane (DCM) (entry 1). In repeating experi-
ments, the product yields varied considerably, and differ-
ent numbers and amounts of side products were formed,
e.g., due to difficult dosing of SO2, even when the same
reaction conditions were applied. The search for an alter-
nativeSO2 sourceled us touse the known 1,4-diazabicyclo-
[2.2.2]octane (DABCO)Àbis(sulfur dioxide) (DABSO)
(entry 2).9 The advantages of this bench-stable colorless
solid are its excellent usability and a fully controllable
dosing of SO2 equivalents. This enhanced synthetic proce-
dure made it more feasible, but the reproducibility of
product yield was still unsatisfying. It is known that an
excess of t-BuLi in solution can lead to complications in
product isolation if an electrophile is added.10 To avoid
any residual t-BuLi, we therefore used only 1.0 equiv for
the bromineÀlithium exchange reaction (entry 3). To our
surprise, the starting material was fully converted, the
yields were slightly increased, and much better reproduci-
bility of the reaction was achieved.
Scheme 1. BromineÀLithium Exchange Reaction with 2 equiv
of t-BuLi
prevented from reacting with either the newly formed
organolithium or another t-BuLi in a putative Wurtz-type
coupling. For these reasons, as far as we know, 2 equiv of
t-BuLi was applied in almost all published syntheses
exploiting an bromineÀlithium exchange reaction.7e,8,15
As a result, it has not been investigated so far whether less
than 2 equiv of t-BuLi might be sufficient for the inter-
conversion with various aryl bromides and if Wurtz-type
coupling products are actually formed in those cases.
The bromineÀlithium exchange rates of various aryl
bromides with varying molar equivalents of t-BuLi were
determined using a gas chromatographyÀmass spectro-
metry (GCÀMS) assisted protonation assay. Therefore,
the aryl bromides were reacted with 1 or 2 equiv of t-BuLi,
respectively, and then protonated by addition of methanol.
The relative conversion percentages were determined
via GCÀMS by integrating the peak areas of unreacted
aryl bromides (Ar-Br) and aromatics (Ar-H) (Table 2).
Initially, we investigated several N-protected 7-azaindoles
(entries 1 to 4). All of them underwent bromineÀlithium
exchange with 1.0 equiv of t-BuLi with conversion rates
>95%. Wurtz-type couplings were not detected between
t-BuBr and the corresponding aryllithium compounds or
between t-BuBr and t-BuLi under these conditions. To
further ensure that the generated t-BuBr did not interfere
with the reaction, we treated compound 1 with 1.0 equiv of
t-BuLi at À80 °C in THF and then stirred the reaction
mixture for 24 h at room temperature. After addition of
methanol, the only product found by analysis with
GCÀMS and NMR spectroscopy was Ar-H. Therefore,
t-BuBr seems to not undergo any further reaction which
would compromise the outcome of the experiments. To
expand the scope to other compound classes, brominated
derivatives of pyridine 6, benzene 7, and pyrrole 8 (Table 2,
entries 5À7) were tested. None of these aryl bromides
underwent a complete bromineÀlithium exchange with
1.0 equiv of t-BuLi. We therefore repeated the experiments
by increasing the amount of t-BuLi in 0.2 equiv steps
until conversions >95% were detected. In the case of
the N-unprotected 7-azaindole derivative 9 an acidic pro-
ton had to be removed by sodium hydride prior to the
Table 1. Formation of 7-Azaindolyl Sulfonyl Chlorides
entry
SO2 source
t-BuLi (equiv)
% yield
a
1
2
3
SO2(g)
2.0
2.0
1.0
27À52b
25À56b
56À58c
DABSO
DABSO
a Inserted into the reaction mixture via syringe over 10 min. b Re-
peated three times. c Repeated two times.
The use of t-BuLi in the lithiumÀhalogen exchange
reaction has attracted considerable attention since the
pioneering works by the groups of Corey and Seebach.11,12
Since then its applicability and mechanistical details have
been further investigated.13 The reaction is a fast and
reversible process leading to an equilibrium mixture favor-
ing the more stable organolithium species.14 Irreversibility
can be achieved by using 2 equiv of t-BuLi. The first
equivalent is used for the exchange, and the second reacts
with the produced t-BuBr to form isobutene, isobutane,
and lithium bromide (Scheme 1).12 In addition, t-BuBr is
(8) Mader, M. M.; Shih, C.; Considine, E.; De Dios, A.; Grossman,
C. S.; Hipskind, P. A.; Lin, H.-S.; Lobb, K. L.; Lopez, B.; Lopez, J. E.;
Martin Cabrejas, L. M; Richett, M. E.; White, W. T.; Cheung, Y.-Y.;
Huang, Z.; Reilly, J. E.; Dinn, S. R. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2005, 15, 617.
(15) For recent examples, see: (a) Bailey, W. F.; Luderer, M. R.;
Jordan, K. P. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 2825. (b) Woolard, F. X.; Paetsch,
J.; Ellman, J. A. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 6102. (c) Hamze, A.; Giraud, A.;
Messaoudi, S.; Provot, O.; Peyrat, J.-F.; Bignon, J.; Liu, J.-M.; Wdzieczak-
Bakala, J.; Thoret, S.; Dubois, J.; Brion, J.-D.; Alami, M. ChemMedChem
ꢀ
(9) Woolven, H.; Gonzalez-Rodrıguez, C.; Marco, I.; Thompson,
´
A. L.; Willis, M. C. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 4876.
(10) Baily, W. F.; Punzalan, E. R. J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 5404.
(11) Corey, E. J.; Beames, D. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1972, 94, 7210.
(12) Seebach, D.; Neumann, H. Chem. Ber. 1974, 107, 847.
(13) Seyferth, D. Organometallics 2006, 25, 2.
(14) Applequist, D. E.; O Brien, D. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1963, 85,
743.
€
2009, 4, 1912. (d) Tietze, L. F.; Dufert, M. A.; Hungerland, T.; Oum, K.;
Lenzer, T. Chem.;Eur. J. 2011, 17, 8452. (e) Wynne, J. H.; Stalick, W. M.
J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 4845. (f) Amat, M.; Hadida, S.; Sathyanarayana, S.;
Bosch, J. Org. Synth. 1997, 74, 248.
B
Org. Lett., Vol. XX, No. XX, XXXX