and 2R. The absorption bands around 600 nm in both
absorption spectra of 1R and 2R can be assigned to the
typical absorption of triphenylimidazolyl radicals (TPIRs).
On the other hand, the decrease in the absorption intensity
at 830 nm of 1Risclearly confirmed, comparedwiththatof
2R. The absorption band around 830 nm of the radical
species of the bridged imidazole dimer is attributed to the
radicalꢀradical interaction resulting from the face to face
alignment of a pair of the radicals.10 Therefore, the overlap
between the π orbitals of the two imidazolyl radicals is the
important factor for the color of the radicals. The radical
of the TPIR moiety is delocalized in the phenyl rings
connected to the imidazole ring. By restricting the TPIR
moiety to the anticonformation, the spatial overlap of the
phenyl rings is decreased. Thus, the decrease in the absorp-
tion band at 830 nm suggests that the overlap integral of
the π orbitals between two radicals is reduced due to the
anti-alignment of the TPIRs.
Figure 5. Transient visꢀNIR absorption spectra of 1R and 2R
just after laser excitation in degassed benzene at 25 °C (1: 1.0 ꢁ
10ꢀ4 M; 2: 1.5 ꢁ 10ꢀ4 M; light path length: 10 mm).
In conclusion, we have reported the new bridged imid-
azole dimer 1 in which triphenylimidazolyl parts are con-
nected with naphthalene in an anti-alignment manner. It is
noted that 1 has the CꢀN bond between N1 and C40 of the
two imidazole rings which is the first report of the 1,40-
isomer of the bridged imidazole dimer. The photochromism
of 1 shows the rapid thermal bleaching reaction to be as fast
as that of 2. The colored species of 1 has the only absorption
band which is characteristic of TPIR although the classical
bridged imidazole dimer has the broad absorption bands
which cover the whole visible region. Thus, the control of
the color of the radicals would be facile compared to the
previously reported bridged imidazole dimers. This work
would present a profitable strategy to develop the bridged
imidazole dimer for application in ophthalmic lenses.
[2.2]PC-bridged imidazole dimer is decelerated compared
with that of pseudogem-DPI-PI[2.2]PC due to the large
nuclear configuration change in the transition state, resulting
in the entropically unfavorable large negative ΔS‡ value. By
comparing the ΔS‡ values of 1R and 2R, we cannot confirm
significant differences (Table 1) suggesting that no distin-
guished degrees of freedom are confirmed in the transition
state of 1R compared with that of 2R even though the binding
manner of the products after the thermal back reaction of 1R
and 2R are the 1,40- and 1,20-isomers, respectively. Normally,
the photochromic properties of the film cannot be consistent
with those in solutions because the reaction rate of photo-
chromism is generally influenced by the environment around
the photochrome.8 Therefore the photochromism of 1 would
be also affected by the matrixes. However, we recently found
that the bridged imidazole dimers can keep their photochro-
mic properties in the polymer matrix with a plasticizer.9 Thus,
the application to the ophthalmic lenses should be achievable
with a plasticizer. The fast photochromic behavior of the
anticonformation bridged imidazole dimer in the polymer
matrix will be investigated in future studies.
Acknowledgment. This work was supported partly by
the Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technol-
ogy (CREST) program of the Japan Science and Technol-
ogy Agency (JST) and a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific
Research (A) (22245025) from the Ministry of Education,
Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), Japan.
1
Supporting Information Available. Synthesis, H, 13C
Figure 5 shows the transient absorption spectra of 1 and
2, measured upon 355 nm excitation in benzene. These
absorption bands can be ascribed to the radical species, 1R
NMR spectra; HPLC chromatogram; X-ray crystallo-
graphic analysis; experimental details for the laser flash
photolysis measurements; kinetics for the thermal back
reaction in benzene. This material is available free of
(8) (a) Ercole, F.; Davis, T. P.; Evans, R. A. Macromolecules 2009, 42,
1500. (b) Norikane, Y.; Davis, R.; Tamaoki, N. New J. Chem. 2009, 33,
1327. (c) Ercole, F.; Malic, N.; Davis, T. P.; Evans, R. A. J. Mater.
ꢀ
Chem. 2009, 19, 5612. (d) Sriprom, W.; Neel, M.; Gabbutt, C. D.; Heron,
B. M.; Perrier, S. J. Mater. Chem. 2007, 17, 1885. (e) Such, G. K.; Evans,
R. A.; Davis, T. P. Macromolecules 2006, 39, 1391. (f) Evans, R. A.;
Hanley, T. L.; Skidmore, M. A.; Davis, T. P.; Such, G. K.; Yee, L. H.;
Ball, G. E.; Lewis, D. A. Nat. Mater. 2005, 4, 249.
(10) (a) Hatano, S.; Sakai, K.; Abe, J. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 4152. (b)
Mutoh, K.; Nakano, E.; Abe, J. J. Phys. Chem. A 2012, 116, 6792.
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
(9) Ishii, N.; Abe, J. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2013, 102, 163301.
D
Org. Lett., Vol. XX, No. XX, XXXX