2
Tetrahedron
Table 1. Optimization of the reaction conditions.a
NEt3
R
NEt3
H2N
BocN
H
H
R
Ph
-S, -I-
HN
C
BocN
NBoc
NH2
BocN
NHBoc
S
NH
C
NBoc
Boc
Boc
Boc
Boc
BocN
NHBoc
+
S
S
I
N
N
N
N
I
I
H
H
H
Scheme 2. Proposed mechanism.
2
3a
1a
Entry
1
Solvent
DMF
Base
NEt3
Yield (%)
83
In conclusion, the I2 mediated oxidative desulfurization of
thioureas to prepare guanidine derivatives was developed.
Various amines, including electronically and sterically
deactivated amines, were transformed to the protected guanidines
under readily accessible conditions.
2
3
4
EtOH
PhMe
PhMe
NEt3
NEt3
77
87
81
K2CO3
5
6
PhMe
PhMe
Py
75
92
Acknowledgments
NEt3
This Project was funded by China Postdoctoral Science Foundation.
a
2
1a
(19 mg, 0.2
Reagents and conditions: thiourea (66 mg, 0.24 mmol), amine
mmol), base (0.48 mmol), solvent (2 mL), I2 (61 mg, 0.24 mmol), rt; b0 C.
References and notes
1. Ishikawa, T.; Kumamoto, T., Synthesis 2006, 2006, 737-752.
2. Berlinck, R. G. S.; Kossuga, M. H., Nat. Prod. Rep. 2005, 22, 516-550.
3. Berlinck, R. G. S.; Burtoloso, A. C. B.; Trindade-Silva, A. E.;
Romminger,
4. S.; Morais, R. P.; Bandeira, K.; Mizuno, C. M., Nat. Prod. Rep. 2010, 27,
5. 1871-1907.
Table 2. Synthesis of guanidines using I2 and N,N′-di-Boc-
thiourea.a
R
N
S
NH
NHBoc
Boc
Boc
R
Boc
N
N
NH2
+
H
H
1
(0.2 mmol)
2
(0.24 mmol)
3
6. Berlinck, R. G. S.; Burtoloso, A. C. B.; Kossuga, M. H., Nat. Prod. Rep.
7. 2008, 25, 919-954.
OMe
Cl
8. Berlinck, R. G. S., Nat. Prod. Rep. 1996, 13, 377-409.
9. Oliver, D. W.; Dormehl, I. C.; Wikberg, J. E. S.; Dambrova, M., Med.
Chem. Res. 2004, 13, 427-438.
HN
HN
HN
HN
Boc
Boc
N
Boc
Boc
Boc
N
NHBoc
NHBoc
96%
N
NHBoc
N
NHBoc
b
10.
Zong-Ying, L.; Xiao-Ying, H.; Yuan-Yuan, Z.; Xiu-Li, D.,
3a,
92%
3b,
3c,
3d,
98%
83%
Agrochemicals 2012, 51, 482-487.
11. Alonso-Moreno, C.; Antiñolo, A.; Carrillo-Hermosilla, F.; Otero, A.,
NO2
F
Cl
CF3 Boc
HN
Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 3406-3425 and references therein.
HN
HN
HN
N
NHBoc
86%
12.
Pattarawarapan, M.; Jaita, S.; Wangngae, S.; Phakhodee, W.,
Boc
Boc
Boc
N
N
NHBoc
NHBoc
N
NHBoc
Tetrahedron Lett. 2016, 57, 1354-1358.
b
b
b
3e,
3f,
3g,
3h,
61%
62%
65%
13. Esteves, H.; de Fatima, A.; Castro, R. D.; Sabino, J. R.; Macedo, F.;
Brito, T. O., Tetrahedron Lett. 2015, 56, 6872-6874.
14. Katritzky, A. R.; Rogovoy, B. V., ARKIVOC 2005, 49-87.
15. Dodd, D. S.; Zhao, Y., Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 1259-1262.
16. Guo, Z.-X.; Cammidge, A. N.; Horwell, D. C., Synth. Commun. 2000,
30, 2933-2943.
17. Gomez, L.; Gellibert, F.; Wagner, A.; Mioskowski, C., Chem. Eur. J.
2000, 6, 4016-4020.
18. Molina, P.; Aller, E.; Lorenzo, A., Synlett 2003, 2003, 0714-0716.
19. Reddy, N. L.; Fan, W.; Magar, S. S.; Perlman, M. E.; Yost, E.; Zhang,
L.; Berlove, D.; Fischer, J. B.; Burke-Howie, K.; Wolcott, T.; Durant, G.
J., J. Med. Chem. 1998, 41, 3298-3302.
OMe
Boc
HN
HN
HN
HN
Boc
Boc
Boc
N
F
N
NHBoc
83%
NHBoc
NHBoc
N
NHBoc
N
NHBoc
82%
3i,
3j,
3k,
3l,
76%
94%
HN
CF3
HN
HN
HN
Boc
Boc
Boc
N
NHBoc
N
N
NHBoc
N
NHBoc
3n,
83%
3m,
77%
3o,
3p,
61%
52%
a
1
2
Reagents and conditions: amine (0.2 mmol), thiourea (0.24 mmol), NEt3 (0.48 mmol), PhMe
20. Scott, F. L.; O'Donovan, D. G.; Reilly, J., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1953, 75,
4053-4054.
b2
(2 mL), I2 (0.24 mmol), 0 C;
(0.48 mmol), NEt3 (0.96 mmol), I2 (0.48 mmol)
21. Bernatowicz, M. S.; Wu, Y.; Matsueda, G. R., J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57,
2497-2502.
22. Poss, M. A.; Iwanowicz, E.; Reid, J. A.; Lin, J.; Gu, Z., Tetrahedron Lett.
1992, 33, 5933-5936.
23. Iwanowicz, E. J.; Poss, M. A.; Lin, J., Synth. Commun. 1993, 23, 1443-
1445.
24. Shie, J. J.; Fang, J. M.; Wang, S. Y.; Tsai, K. C.; Cheng, Y. S.; Yang, A.
S.; Hsiao, S. C.; Su, C. Y.; Wong, C. H., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129,
11892-3.
25. Mohan, S.; McAtamney, S.; Haselhorst, T.; von Itzstein, M.; Pinto, B.
M., J. Med. Chem. 2010, 53, 7377-7391.
26. Kim, C. U.; Lew, W.; Williams, M. A.; Wu, H.; Zhang, L.; Chen, X.;
Escarpe, P. A.; Mendel, D. B.; Laver, W. G.; Stevens, R. C., J. Med.
Chem. 1998, 41, 2451-2460.
27. Gupta, D.; Varghese Gupta, S.; Dahan, A.; Tsume, Y.; Hilfinger, J.; Lee,
K.-D.; Amidon, G. L., Mol. Pharm. 2013, 10, 512-522.
28. Duong, H. Q.; Sieburth, S. M., J. Org. Chem. 2018, 83, 5398-5409.
Various primary anilines (3a-g), benzylic (3h-j) and aliphatic
(3k-p) amines with different substitution were tested. The desired
guanidines were obtained in 52-98% yield. Due to the unstable
nature of the reactive intermediates, the yield decreased slightly
when sterically or electronically deactivated amines (3d-g, 3n-p)
were used (Table 2). However, no product was detected when
using secondary amines. The free guanidines can be prepared by
simple deprotection of the Boc-protected guanidine according to
the literature method.19
Base on previous reports,29, 37-40 a plausible mechanism for this
reaction was proposed: the oxidative desulfurization of thiourea 2
mediated by I2 in the presence of NEt3 generates the
corresponding carbodiimide in situ. Then, the carbodiimide is
attacked by the amine to form the desired protected guanidines
(Scheme 2).
29. Dardonville, C.; Goya, P.; Rozas, I.; Alsasua, A.; Martı́n, M. I.; Borrego,
M. J., Biorg. Med. Chem. 2000, 8, 1567-1577.
30. Kim, K. S.; Qian, L., Tetrahedron Lett. 1993, 34, 7677-7680.
31. Yong, Y. F.; Kowalski, J. A.; Lipton, M. A., J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62,
1540-1542.
32. Ohara, K.; Vasseur, J.-J.; Smietana, M., Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50,
1463-1465.
33. Godoi, B.; Schumacher, R. F.; Zeni, G., Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 2937-
2980.