Ramachandran et al.
1H NMR examination revealed modest preferential vi-
nylalumination of the carbonyl bearing the methyl group
(55%) over the carbonyl bearing the ethyl group (45%)
(eq 11). When the â-methyl-substituted reagent 2 was
used, the corresponding products 6u and 6′u were formed
in a 2:3 ratio. The preference toward the methyl side
increased considerably with reagent 3. The corresponding
products 7u and 7′u were formed in a 1:4 ratio. Clearly,
the steric interactions of the reagent and the carbonyl
group determine the outcome of the vinylalumination.
The results are shown in Table 4 (entries 6-8).
-ketones via vinylalumination.26 Similar to several acti-
vated carbonyls, the vinylalumination of R-bromocarbo-
nyls also proceeds without Lewis acid catalysis and the
products were readily converted to functionalized vinyle-
poxides.
Vinylalumination of bromoacetaldehyde (4w ) was com-
plete in 15 h at rt. Dilute HCl workup provided 65% yield
of the product bromohydrin 5w (eq 13). The reaction was
then extended to representative bromo ketones. Phenacyl
bromide (4x) and 1-bromo-3,3,3-trifluoro-2-propanone
(4y) provided the corresponding bromohydrins 5x and 5y
in 74% and 60% yields, respectively (eq 13).
We then studied the vinylalumination of an unsym-
metrical R-diketone with differing electronic surround-
ings. With 1-phenyl-1,2-propanedione (4v), reagent 1
reacted preferentially with the carbonyl adjacent to the
phenyl ring to give a 3:1 ratio of 5v and 5′v (eq 12).
However, â-methyl substitution of the reagent (2) de-
creases the preference for the aryl carbonyl. The bulkier
â-phenyl-substituted reagent (3) provides the products
in an almost 1:1 ratio. These results reveal that steric
as well as electronic factors play a role in the regiochemi-
cal outcome of the reaction. Unlike in the case of 4u , the
products from 4v could be readily separated by column
chromatography. The results of vinylalumination of
diketones are summarized in Table 4 (entries 6-11).
We avoided strong aqueous alkaline conditions for the
cyclization of these bromohydrins due to the presence of
the ester moiety. The epoxide formation from 5w and 5x
was successfully carried out with K2CO3 as base (eq 13).
We conducted the cyclizations in dry acetone and ob-
tained 75-88% yields of the vinylepoxides. However, the
trifluoromethyl bromohydrin 5y afforded only 65% yield
of the corresponding epoxide 8y, and we improved the
yield to 82% by replacing K2CO3 with KF.27
Vin yla lu m in a tion of Keto-P r otected P yr u va ld e-
h yd e: Syn th esis of R-Alk ylid en e-â-h yd r oxy-γ-la c-
ton es. Several natural products contain R-alkylidene-â-
hydroxy-γ-methylbutyrolactone moiety.28 Listenolides are
a group of such molecules; they have been isolated in the
1970s from the roots and leaves of Listea japonica
belonging to Lauraceae family.29 Listenolides are divided
into two series: X1 and X2, having Z and E alkylidene
units, respectively. Several syntheses of these molecules
have been reported.30 We applied our vinylalumination
protocol for the synthesis of representative R-methylene-
â-hydroxy-γ-butyrolactone 9 and its â-substituted ana-
logue listenolide A1 (10).
Vin yla lu m in a tion of r-Ha loca r bon yls: Syn th esis
of F u n ction a lized Vin ylep oxid es. Vinylepoxides are
an important class of synthons in organic chemistry.22
They constitute an important component of natural
molecules, such as carotenoids.23 Vinylepoxides have been
utilized in the preparation of molecules with pharma-
ceutical applications24 and are commonly used in polymer
chemistry.25 The importance of vinylepoxides in organic
syntheses prompted us to examine the preparation of the
vinyl halohydrin precursors from R-haloaldehydes and
Our protocol is shown in Scheme 1. â-Substituted
substrate for the hydroalumination, ethyl tetradec-13-
(22) (a) Olofsson, B.; Khamrai, U.; Somfai, P. Org. Lett. 2000, 2,
4087. (b) Zaidlewicz, M.; Krzeminski, M. P. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 3897.
(c) Lindstro¨m, U. M.; Franckowiak, R.; Pinault, N.; Somfai, P.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 2027. (d) Gorzynski-Smith, J . Synthesis
1994, 629.
(26) Ramachandran, P. V.; Krzeminski, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999,
40, 7879.
(27) Lundt, I.; Pedersen, C. Synthesis 1992, 662.
(23) Rønnekleiv, M.; Lenes, M.; Norgård, S.; Liaaen-J ensen, S.
Phytochemistry 1995, 39, 631. (b) Ogata, Y.; Kosugi, Y.; Tomizawa, K.
Tetrahedron 1970, 26, 5939.
(24) (a) Habashita, H.; Kawaski, T.; Takemoto, Y.; Fujii, N.; Ibuka,
T. J . Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 2392. (b) Clive, D. J .; Wickens, P. L.; Dasilva,
G. V. J . J . Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 5532. (c) Wei-Shan, Z.; J iang, B.; Pan,
X.-F. J . Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1989, 612.
(25) (a) Koizumi, T.; Imai, T.; Endoz, T. J . Polymer Sci. 2003, 41,
476. (b) Koizumi, T.; Sakamoto, J .; Gondo, Y.; Endo, T. Macromolecules
2002, 35, 2898.
(28) Hoffmann, H. M. R.; Rabe, J . Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl.
1985, 24, 94.
(29) (a) Takeda, K.; Sakurawi, K.; Ishii, H. Tetrahedron 1972, 28,
3757-3766. (b) Tanaka, H.; Nakamura, T.; Ichino, K.; Ito, K.; Tanaka,
T. Phytochemistry 1990, 29, 857-859.
(30) (a) Rollinson, S. W.; Amos, R.; Katzenellenbogen, J . J . Am.
Chem. Soc. 1981, 103, 4114. (b) Chen, S.-Y.; J oullie´, M. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1983, 24, 5027. (c) Wood, W.; Watson, G. J . Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 1 1987, 2681. (d) Wakabayashi, S.; Ogwa, H.; Ueno, N.;
Kunieda, N.; Mandai, T.; Nokami, J . Chem. Lett. 1987, 875.
9314 J . Org. Chem., Vol. 68, No. 24, 2003