1001
SYNTHESIS OF IMINES BASED ON OROTIC ALDEHYDE AND AMINO ACIDS
H2
H1
O1
C1
H1
H2
C3
O1
H
H
N1
H
H
N1
O3
H
H
H
O
N1
C1
C1
H
C3
C3
H
H
1
2
H
H3
O
C
C
C
N3
H
O
O3
N3
O
H3
H3
O3
H
N3
O
H
H
O
O
O1
N
N
N
H
H1
O
O
H2
H
H
reaction is accompanied by a small positive thermal
effect (5 kcal mol–1).
(E)-Ethyl 4-[(2,6-dioxo-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyrimi-
din-4-yl)methyleneamino]benzoate (II) was prepared
similarly. Yield 59%, mp 245°C. Found, %: C 57.8; H
5.0; N 14.9. С14H13N3O4.Calculated, %: C 58.5; H 4.5;
N 14.6.
The second stage, unlike the first one, is
characterized by a lower activation barrier. The saddle
point is reached when the reaction coordinate RH2–O1
(0.13 nm) is located at 53.8 kcal mol–1. This stage is ac-
companied by a slight negative heat effect (4 kcal mol–1).
However, the water release in the second stage leads to
irreversible process.
(E)-4-[(2,6-Dioxo-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyrimidin-4-
yl)methyleneamino]benzoic acid (III) was prepared
similarly. Yield 81%, mp 275°C. Found, %: C 55.9; H
4.0; N 16.0. С12H9N3O4. Calculated, %: C 55.6; H 3.5;
N 16.2.
The quantum chemical calculation was performed
for the gaseous systems excluding the solvents
participation (water, acetic acid), which can reduce the
activation barrier and facilitate the reaction progress.
The total energy gain during the formation of imine
from the reactants is small (1 kcal mol–1).
(E)-4-[(2,6-Dioxo-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyrimidin-4-
yl)methyleneamino]acetic acid (IV) was prepared
similarly (solvent – water, 80°C). Yield 32%, mp 265°C.
Found, %: C 41.7; H 3.7; N 22.5. С7H7N3O4. Cal-
culated, %: C 42.6; H 3.6; N 21.3.
Thus, the stage determining the formation of
iminoesters is the first stage, when the hydroxyl-
containing compound is formed. Dehydration of the
latter requires less energy and leads to irreversible
reaction.
The IR spectra were obtained on a Specord M-82
instrument from mulls in mineral oil.
REFERENCES
1. Rakhimov, A.I. and Shul’man, R.B., Novye dostizheniya
v khimii karbonil’nykh i geterotsyklicheskikh soedinenii
(New Advances in the Chemistry of Carbonyl and
Heterocyclic Compounds), Saratov: Saratov. Univ.,
2000, p. 186.
2. Rakhimov, A.I., Shul’man, R.B., Sinel’nikov, P.Yu.,
and Storozhakova, N.A., Novye dostizheniya v khimii
karbonil’nykh i geterotsyklicheskikh soedinenii (New
Advances in the Chemistry of Carbonyl and Hetero-
cyclic Compounds), Saratov: Saratov. Univ., 2000, p. 188.
3. Schmidt, M.W., Baldridge, K.K., Boatz, J.A., Elbert, S.T.,
Gordon, M.S., Jensen, J.H., Koseki, S., Matsunaga, N.,
Nguyen, K.A., Su, S.J., Windus, T.L., Dupuis, M., and
Montgomery, J.A., J. Comput. Chem., 1993, vol. 14,
p. 1347.
(E)-Butyl 6-(6-{6-[(2,6-dioxo-1,2,3,6-tetrahydro-
pyrimidin-4-yl)methyleneamino]hexanamido} hexan-
amido)hexanoate (I). A mixture of 2.57 g (0.0048 mol)
of n-butyl ester of ε-aminocaproic acid trimer, 25 ml of
glacial acetic acid, and 0.56 g (0.004 mol) of orotic
aldehyde was refluxed with stirring for 2 h and then
cooled to room temperature. The precipitate was
filtered off, washed successively with ethanol and
diethyl ether to remove the initial reagents, and dried.
The reaction products were purified by sublimation in
vacuo. Yield 1.1 g (56%), mp 178–180°C. Found, %:
C 59.1; H 9.0; N 13.9. С27H45N5O6. Calculated, %: C
60.6; H 8.4; N 13.1.
RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF GENERAL CHEMISTRY Vol. 83 No. 5 2013