606
Huang XM, et al. Sci China Chem May (2013) Vol.56 No.5
2c: Yield 88%; 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6): (ppm)
2.25 (s, 12H), 4.15 (s, 4H), 5.01 (s, 4H), 5.33 (s, 2H), 6.60
(d, J = 9.0 Hz, 4H), 6.74 (d, J=6.2 Hz, 4H), 7.24 (d, J=9.0
Hz, 4H), 7.30 (d, J = 6.2 Hz, 4H); IR (KBr, cm1): ν = 3391,
3324, 3210(N-H), 2982, 2920, 2860(C–H), 1609, 1508(–C6H5),
1384–1349(C–N), 825(N–H) cm1; Anal. Calcd. for
C24H30N4: C, 76.97; H, 8.07; N, 14.96%. Found: C, 76.95;
H, 8.04; N, 14.95%.
formed on AV-300 NMR instrument at ambient temperature
of 300 and 121 MHz. All of the chemical shifts were re-
ported downfield in ppm relative to the hydrogen resonance
of TMS. The conversions (with n-nonane as internal stand-
ard) and the ee values were analyzed by gas chromatog-
raphy (GC) with a Shimadzu GC2010 (Japan) instrument
equipped using a chiral column (HP19091G-B233, 30 m ×
25 m × 0.25 m) and FID detector, injector 230 °C, detector
230 °C. The column temperature was in the range of
80–150 °C.
Bis-diamine-bridged bi-Mn(salen) complexes (3a3c)
Bis-diamine derivative axially coordinated ligands 2a–2c
(1.5 mmol), chiral Jacobsen’s catalyst (4.5 mmol, 3 equiv)
and NaOH (4.5 mmol) in THF (25 mL) was vigorously
stirred for 24 h under reflux. The dark brown powder was
collected by filtration and washed thoroughly with ethanol,
and deionized water respectively, then dissolved in CH2Cl2,
filtrated, and the filtrate was collected, evaporated under
reduced pressure, dried under vacuum.
2.2 Synthesis of bis-diamine-bridged bi-Mn(salen) com-
plexes
1,4-Bis(bromomethyl)-2,3,5,6-tetramethylbenzene (1)
1,2,4,5-Tetramethylbenzene (8.04 g, 6.0 mmol), paraform-
aldehyde (5.4 g, 180 mmol, 3 equiv) and potassium bromide
(23.42 g, 180 mmol, 3 equiv) were mixed with 80 mL acetic
acid at room temperature. Then the mixed solution of 10
mL concentrated sulfuric acid (180 mmol, 3 equiv) and 10
mL acetic acid (180 mmol, 3 equiv) was added dropwise.
The solution was vigorously stirred with mechanical agita-
tion overnight at 95 °C. The grey solid was collected by
filtration and extracted with CH2Cl2. The yellow solid was
obtained by evaporation of the filtrate under reduced pres-
sure. The crude product was crystallized by ethyl acetate to
3a: Yield 90%; IR (KBr, cm1): ν = 3393(NH), 2914,
2871(C–H), 1630(C=N), 1605, 1510(–C6H5), 1350–1245
(C–N), 820(N–H), 519(Mn–O) cm1 (Figure S1 in the Sup-
porting Information); UV-Vis: (CH2Cl2) max 330, 421, 503;
Anal. Calcd. for C96H132Mn2N8O4: C, 73.35; H, 8.46; N,
7.13%. Found: C, 73.31; H, 8.44; N, 7.10%.
3b: Yield 84%; IR (KBr, cm1): ν = 3410(N–H), 2982,
2864(C–H), 1630(C=N), 1613 1502(–C6H5), 1350–1239
(C–N), 809(N–H), 505(Mn–O) cm1 (Figure S1); UV-Vis:
(CH2Cl2) max 340, 429, 512 (Figure S2 in the Supporting
Information); Anal. Calcd. for C108H140Mn2N8O4: C, 75.23;
H, 8.18; N, 6.50%. Found: C, 75.20; H, 8.15; N, 6.48%.
3c: Yield 86%; IR (KBr, cm1): ν = 3397(N–H), 2923,
2868(C–H), 1629(C=N), 1607, 1501(–C6H5), 1349–1250
(C–N), 872(N–H), 510(Mn–O) cm1 (Figure S1); UV-Vis:
(CH2Cl2) max 321, 415, 496. Anal. Calcd. for C96H132Mn2N8O4:
C, 73.35; H, 8.46; N, 7.13%. Found: C, 73.32; H, 8.43; N,
7.11%.
1
obtain white needle crystal 1 in a yield of 87%. H NMR
(300 MHz, CDCl3): (ppm) = 2.33 (s, 12H), 4.60 (s, 4H);
13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): = 134.4, 133.8, 30.7, 15.6;
IR (KBr, cm1): ν = 2921.2, 1618.8, 1433.4, 507.4 cm1.
C2-symmetrical bis-diamine ligands (2a2c)
Diamine (25 mmol, 2.5 equiv) and sodium hydroxide (1 g,
25 mmol, 2.5 equiv) in 50 mL absolute THF, and 1,4-
bis(bromomethyl)-2,3,5,6-tetramethylbenzene (3.17 g, 10
mmol) in 20 mL absolute THF was added dropwise. The
mixture was then vigorously stirred for 24 h at 65 °C under
N2 protection. After cooled to room temperature, the precip-
itate was filtered off, washed with ethanol, distilled water,
Na2CO3 (5%), respectively, and the product 2 was obtain
after dried under vacuum.
2.3
Synthesis of arylamine modified chiral salen
Mn(III) catalyst 4
The arylamine modified chiral salen Mn(III) catalyst were
prepared according to similar procedure to bis-diamine-
bridged bi-Mn(Salen) catalysts [16] (Scheme 2).
2a: Yield 82%; 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6):
(ppm) 2.22 (s, 12H), 4.00 (s, 4H), 4.47 (s, 6H), 6.37–6.62
(m, 8H); IR (KBr, cm1): ν = 3427, 3391, 3348(N–H), 2969,
2894, 2874(C–H), 1612, 1501(–C6H5), 1350–1241(C–N),
810(N–H) cm1; Anal. Calcd. for C24H30N4: C, 76.97; H,
8.07; N, 14.96%. Found: C, 76.94; H, 8.03; N, 14.94%.
2b: Yield 85%; 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6): (ppm)
2.22 (s, 12H), 4.05 (s, 4H), 4.73 (s, 4H), 4.93 (s, 2H), 6.01
(m, 6H), 6.74 (t, J = 6.2 Hz, 2H); IR (KBr, cm1): ν = 3418,
3378, 3309(N–H), 2982, 2869(C–H), 1612, 1501 (–C6H5),
1360–1241(C–N), 810(N–H) cm1 (in Figure S1); Anal.
Calcd. for C36H30N4: C, 82.09; H, 7.27; N, 10.64%. Found:
C, 82.06; H, 7.25; N, 10.61%.
2.4 General procedures for enantioselective epoxida-
tion
All catalytic reactions were performed under laboratory
atmosphere. The course of the product formation was mon-
itored by GC analysis. A working model of the bis-diamine-
bridged bi-Mn(salen) complex was showed in Figure 1.
Epoxidation of olefins were carried out in two methods.
Method A. A solution of 1.0 mmol of olefin in 4.0 mL of
CH2Cl2, the homogeneous diamine-bridged bi-Mn(salen)