molecules based on the 10-(1,3-dithiol-2-ylidene)-
anthracene core (see Scheme S1 in the Supporting Infor-
mation (SI)), absorbing in a broad region of the visible
spectrum. The chemical structures of the new pushꢀpull
materials have been unambiguously confirmed by single-
crystal X-ray diffraction, and their electrochemical and
optical properties have been characterized with the help
of density functional theory (DFT) calculations. Recently,
we have described the preparation of 10-(1,3-dithiol-2-
ylidene)anthracene derivatives for their application in
dye-sensitized solar cells.5 Molecular engineering of
this appealing core allows the design of materials with
improved light-harvesting properties. The new dyes
synthesized here bear the same electron-donor unit, the
10-(1,3-dithiol-2-ylidene)anthracene group, but a different
conjugated π-bridge, 3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene (EDOT)
for 6 or phenyl for 4 and 5, as well as two kinds of electro-
accepting units, an ester group for 4 and a dicyanovinylene
group for 5 and 6 (Figure 1).
organic solvents. The structures of all the new compounds
and the new sensitizers were confirmed by 1H, 13C NMR,
and high resolution mass spectrometry.
Slow evaporation of chloroform solutions of 2, 5, and 6
allowed the obtention of single crystals suitable for its
study by X-ray diffraction (Figures 2 aswell asS10and S11
in the SI).7 The compounds adopt the typical butterfly- or
saddle-like shape observed for exTTF (2-[9-(1,3-dithiol-2-
ylidene)anthracen-10(9H)-ylidene]-1,3-dithiole) derivatives.8
The existence of several CꢀH π and π π stacking
3 3 3
3 3 3
3 3 3
interactions plus other weaker CꢀH NtC and
CꢀH S hydrogen bonds led to the formation of supra-
3 3 3
molecular networks of compounds 2, 5, and 6.
The synthesis of the key synthon 1, featuring two
terminal alkyne groups (Scheme S1), was carried out in
four steps in good yield.6 The conjugated bridges were then
introduced by the Sonogashira cross-coupling reaction
using PdCl2(PPh3)2 and CuI as catalysts. The introduction
of the accepting units was achieved by 2-fold Knoevenagel
condensation of aldehydes 2 and 3 with malononitrile,
to afford the new dyes 5 and 6 in good to moderate yields
(75% and 50%, respectively; see the SI). Dye 4, with the
two decyl chains, displays excellent solubility in the main
Figure 2. (a) X-ray crystal structure of 6. (b) Unit cell.
The molecular geometries of the three pushꢀpull systems
were optimized using DFT calculations at the B3LYP/
6-31G** level (see the SI for computational details). The
decyl chains in 4 were replaced by a simple methyl group to
simplify the calculation. As obtained from X-ray analysis,
theoretical calculations predict concave saddle-like struc-
tures, in which the central ring of the anthracene unit folds
up in a boat conformation and the dithiole rings are tilted
down. The planes defined by the external benzene rings of
the anthracene unit are predicted to form an angle of 40.5°
for 5 and 38.6° for 6 slightly overestimating the angles
obtained by X-ray diffraction (36.2° and 34.5°, respectively)
due to the packing forces present in the crystal that tend to
reduce the folding. The dihedral angles of 35.5° computed
for the dithiole tilting in 5 and 6 nicely fit the X-ray values of
34.2° (5) and 34.1° (6). The same considerations apply for
the tilting of the acceptor moiety (see Table S1 in the SI).
The acceptor arms remain mostly planar in all dyes thus
favoring the π-electron communication along the acceptor
moiety. This planarity is even more pronounced in the
crystal due to the efficient πꢀπ coplanar interactions in
the packing (see Figure 2b and Table S1).
Figure 1. Pushꢀpull systems 4, 5, and 6.
Figure 3 shows the atomic orbital (AO) composition
of the highest-occupied (HOMOꢀ2 to HOMO) and
(4) (a) Kim, S.; Lee, J. K.; Kang, S. O.; Ko, J.; Yum, J. H.; Fantacci,
€
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 16701–16707. (b) Wenger, S.; Bouit, P.-A.;
Chen, Q.; Teuscher, J.; Di Censo, D.; Humphry-Baker, R.; Moser, J. E.;
€
´
Delgado, J. L.; Martın, N.; Zakeeruddin, S. M.; Gratzel, M. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 5164–5169.
(5) Bouit, P.-A; Marszalek, M.; Humphry-Baker, R.; Viruela, R.;
S.; De Angelis, F.; Di Censo, D.; Nazeeruddin, M. K.; Gratzel, M.
(7) CCDC 900353 (2), CCDC 890337 (5), and CCDC 890785 (6)
contain the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These
data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystal-
(8) Batsanov, A. S.; Bryce, M. R.; Coffin, M. A.; Green, A.; Hester,
€
Ortı, E.; Zakeeruddin, S.-M.; Gratzel, M.; Delgado, J. L.; Martın, N.
´ ´
Chem.;Eur. J. 2012, 18, 11621–11629.
(6) Chen, G.; Wang, L.; Thompson, D. W.; Zhao, Y. Org. Lett. 2008,
10, 657–660.
R. E.; Howard, J. A. K.; Lednev, I. K.; Martı
´
n, N.; Moore, A. J.; Moore,
, E.; Sanchez, L.; Saviron, M.; Viruela, P. M.; Viruela, R.; Ye,
T.-Q. Chem.;Eur. J. 1998, 4, 2580–2592.
ꢀ
ꢀ
J. N.; Ortı
´
Org. Lett., Vol. 15, No. 16, 2013
4167