Catalytic asymmetric synthesis of (S)-laudanosine by hydroamination

Article abstract of DOI:10.3987/COM-12-S(N)44

Lithium amide-chiral bisoxazoline-catalyzed asymmetric intramolecular hydroamination was examined with respect to the structural variants of starting aminoalkenes. Substituents on the nitrogen and olefin of aminoalkenes were found to be important factors affecting reaction efficiency as well as enentioselectivity in the production of chiral tetrahydroisoquinolines and isoindolines. The catalytic asymmetric total synthesis of (S)-laudanosine highlights the utility of the asymmetric hydroamination.

Full text of DOI:10.3987/COM-12-S(N)44

HETEROCYCLES, Vol. 86, No. 1, 2012
469
HETEROCYCLES, Vol. 86, No. 1, 2012, pp. 469 - 485. © 2012 The Japan Institute of Heterocyclic Chemistry
Received, 19th June, 2012, Accepted, 20th July, 2012, Published online, 31st July, 2012
DOI: 10.3987/COM-12-S(N)44
CATALYTIC ASYMMETRIC SYNTHESIS OF (S)-LAUDANOSINE BY
HYDROAMINATION
Tokutaro Ogata,1 Tetsutaro Kimachi,1 Ken-ichi Yamada,2 Yasutomo
Yamamoto,3 and Kiyoshi Tomioka3*
1
Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Mukogawa Women’s University, 11-68
Koshien Kyubancho, Nishinomiya 663-8179, Hyogo, Japan. 2 Graduate School of
Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kyoto University, Yoshida, Sakyo, Kyoto 606-8501,
Japan. 3 Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Doshisha Women's College of Liberal
Arts, Kodo, Kyotanabe 610-0395, Japan; E-mail: tomioka@pharm.kyoto-u.ac.jp
This paper is dedicated to Prof. Ei-ichi Negishi on the occasion of his 77th kiju
birthday.
Abstract
–
Lithium amide–chiral bisoxazoline-catalyzed asymmetric
intramolecular hydroamination was examined with respect to the structural variants
of starting aminoalkenes. Substituents on the nitrogen and olefin of aminoalkenes
were found to be important factors affecting reaction efficiency as well as
enentioselectivity in the production of chiral tetrahydroisoquinolines and
isoindolines. The catalytic asymmetric total synthesis of (S)-laudanosine highlights
the utility of the asymmetric hydroamination.
INTRODUCTION
Asymmetric intramolecular hydroamination of aminoalkenes is a highly versatile C–N bond forming
reaction useful for the synthesis of nitrogen-containing chiral heterocycles.1 We have already reported the
chiral bisoxazoline (box) 3a–lithium diisopropylamide (LDA)-catalyzed asymmetric intramolecular
hydroamination of aminoalkenes 1a giving 1-benzyltetrahydroisoquinoline 2a with 84% ee in 97% yield
(Scheme 1).2-4 1-Benzylisoindoline 2b with excellent 91% ee was also synthesized in 99% yield by the
catalysis of chiral bisoxazoline 3b–LDA. In this paper we describe the extension of this intramolecular
hydroamination method to the cyclization of other type of aminoalkenes and further application to the
asymmetric total synthesis of representative isoquinoline alkaloid (S)-laudanosine.

470
HETEROCYCLES, Vol. 86, No. 1, 2012
Box 3 (0.4 equiv)
n-BuLi (0.2 equiv)
i-Pr2NH (0.2 equiv)
n
n
O
O
O
O
NHMe
NMe
N
N
N
N
S
H
H
toluene
–60 °C
3a
(1a to 2a)
3b
(1b to 2b)
1a (n = 1)
1b (n = 0)
2a (n = 1): 97%, 84% ee (S)
2b (n = 0): 98%, 91% ee (R)
Scheme 1. Chiral box–LDA-catalyzed asymmetric intramolecular hydroamination of aminoalkenes 1.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The asymmetric intramolecular hydroamination of aminoalkenes 1a and 1b was effectively catalyzed by
chiral box 3–lithium amide catalyst.2 The structural features of aminoalkenes 1a and 1b are (a) an N-methyl
group, (b) an aromatic ring connecting an amino group and an olefin, and (c) phenyl group on a terminal
carbon of olefin (Figure 1). To verify whether these features are essential for the reaction, other types of
aminoalkenes 1c–f were prepared and examined their possibilities in the intramolecular hydroamination.
OMe
a
N
NHMe
N
n N
H
H
H
b
HN
c
1ab
1c
1d
1e
1f
Figure 1. Aminoalkenes 1c–1f for an asymmetric intramolecular hydroamination.
Synthesis of aminoalkenes 1c–1f
As shown in Scheme 2 N-PMB (4-methoxybenzyl) aminoalkene 1c and N-allyl aminoalkene 1d were
prepared from the same aldehyde 4, which was prepared by the Heck reaction of commercially available
2-bromobenzaldehyde and styrene.5 The Henry reaction of 4 and following LiAlH4 reduction of nitroalkene
56 gave primary amine 6.7 Reductive 4-methoxybenzylation of 6 afforded N-PMB aminoalkene 1c.
Reductive amination of 4 with allylamine gave 1d.8 The sequential treatment of benzaldehyde with
vinylmagnesium bromide,9 Johnson–Claisen rearrangement,10 hydrolysis of ethyl ester 8, amidation of a
carboxylic acid 9 with allylamine, and finally LiAlH4 reduction of amide 10 gave 1e. According to the
reported procedure, 1f was synthesized starting from 2-bromobenzaldehyde 11 by the Wittig olefination.11
Halogen–lithium exchange of 12 and formylation with DMF gave 13, and then reductive amination with
methylamine gave 1f.11c,d

HETEROCYCLES, Vol. 86, No. 1, 2012
471
OMe
CHO
NO2
MeNO2
NH4OAc
O
LiAlH4
NH2
LiAlH4
1c
Et2O
0 °C, 1 h
69%
100 °C, 1 h
74%
Et2O
0 °C, 1 h
86%, 2 steps
rt, 3 h
6
4
5
i.
H2N
MeOH
rt, 1 h
4
1d
ii. NaBH4
0 °C, 1 h
96%
O
MeC(OEt)3
propionic acid
OEt
MgCl
O
EtO
O
O
HO
O
xylene
reflux, 2.5 h
Et2O
0 °C, 1 h
7
8
ClCO2Et
Et3N
OH
N
H
H2N
KOH
LiAlH4
1e
dioxane/MeOH/H2O
(6/1/3)
THF
0 °C, 1 h
Et2O
rt, 20 h
THF
rt, 20 h
rt, 1 h
9
10
1) H2NMe
CHO MeOH
Ph3PMeBr
n-BuLi
n-BuLi
DMF
Br
Br
rt, 4 h
1f
THF
rt, 21 h
57%
THF
NaBH
0 °C, 1 h
2)
4
CHO
–78 °C to rt, 2.5 h
68%
11
12
13
68%
Scheme 2. Synthesis of aminoalkenes 1c–1f.
Asymmetric hydroamination of aminoalkenes 1c–f
Substituents of amine were examined on the reaction efficiency and enantioselectivity (Figure 1, moiety (a)
of 1ab). From the synthetic viewpoint, easily removable PMB and allyl groups were selected as a candidate
(Table 1, entries 3 and 4). N-PMB aminoalkene 1c was treated with chiral box 3c and LDA in toluene at
0 °C to give cyclized tetrahydroisoquinoline derivative 2c in as high as 94% yield. However,
enantioselectivity was only 11% ee (entry 3). Since the stereoselectivity of the corresponding N-methyl
derivative 2a is 71% ee by using the same box 3c (entry 1),2 N-PMB group was unfavorable for this
asymmetric reaction. On the other hand, the reaction of N-allyl aminoalkene 1d12 gave isoindoline
derivative 2d with 83% ee in 98% yield (entry 4), which was almost same selectivity as that of N-methyl
derivatives 2b2 (entries 2 and 4). These results indicated that methyl or allyl N-substituent led to the
cyclization with better enantioselectivities.
Aromatic ring connecting secondary amine and olefin moieties (Figure 1, (b) of 1ab) was examined with
respect to their effect on the reaction efficiency by the reaction of 1e in which no aromatic ring exists.

472
HETEROCYCLES, Vol. 86, No. 1, 2012
The hydroamination of 1e gave 2e in 90% yield; however, the enantioselectivity was only 18% ee (entry 5).
This result indicated that the presence of aromatic ring was also important to achieve good
enantioselectivity.
The terminal phenyl group of olefin, (c) moiety of 1ab in Figure 1, affected regioselectivity as well as
enantioselectivity. The reaction of 1f, having no terminal phenyl group, afforded the expected
5-exo-cyclization product 2f as the major one in 33% yield with 43% ee, 6-endo cyclization product 14f in
7% yield, intermolecularly reacted dimer 15 in 28% yield, and recovered 1f in 19% yield (entry 6). These
results indicated that a terminal phenyl group directs originally favored 5-exo cyclization (entries 2, 4 and
5) by sterically blocking attack at the terminal olefin carbon.
Table 1. Chiral bisoxazoline 3c–LDA-catalyzed asymmetric intramolecular hydroamination of
aminoalkenes 1.
O
O
N
N
3c
(0.2-0.4 equiv)
R
R
n-BuLi (0.2 equiv)
i-Pr2NH (0.15-0.9 equiv)
n N
H
n N
N R
R'
+
R'
toluene
R'
1
2
14
Entry
1a
1
2
temp
(°C)
time
(h)
2 yield
2 ee 14 yield
(%)
(%)
71
(%)
0
–60
5
99
HN
N
Me
Me
Me
2a
1a
2a
–60
5
99
84
11b
83c
0
0
0
N
N Me
H
2b
1b
OMe
OMe
3
0
31
2
94
98
HN
N
2c
1c
4
–40
N
H
N
1d
2d

HETEROCYCLES, Vol. 86, No. 1, 2012
473
5d
N
H
–40 to rt
21
1
90
33
18b
43b
0
7
N
2e
1e
1f
6e
–20
Me
N
N Me
H
Me
2f
a ref 2.
b Absolute configuration was not determined.
c
Absolute configuration was determined by the specific rotation after conversion of 2d to 2b by
deallylation–methylation.
d The reaction was carried out at –40 °C for 3 h, at –20 °C for 3 h and then at room temperature for 15 h.
e Dimer 15 (28%) was also obtained, and 1f (19%) was recovered.
NHMe
N
Me
15
The absolute configuration of 2d was unambiguously determined by correlating with (S)-2b13 of the
established configuration (Scheme 3). The sense of enantiofacial selectivity of N-allyl aminoalkene 1d is
identical with that of N-methyl aminoalkene 1b.
N
NH
N CHO
N Me
RhCl(PPh3)3
HCO2Et
BH3•THF
S
MeCN/H2O
reflux, 2 h
40%
rt, 0.5 h
93%
THF
reflux, 15 min
98%
2d
83% ee
16
17
(S)-2b
 25
[ ] D +75.5
(c 1.05, CHCl3)
Scheme 3. Correlation of 2d with 2b.
Reaction pathway of intramolecular hydroamination
The plausible reaction pathway was shown in Scheme 4. The aminoalkene 1b was deprotonated by n-BuLi
and/or LDA to give the corresponding lithium amide 18, to which chiral bisoxazoline 3 coordinated.
Aminolithiation of 18 gave cyclized product 19, and subsequent protonation by i-Pr2NH 20 and/or 1b
furnished hydroamination product 2b, and i-Pr2NLi 21 or 16. In the case that 19 was protonated with
i-Pr2NH 20, catalytic cycle was accomplished by the deprotonation of 1b with LDA 21 to give 18 again.
The possible stereoinduction step is kinetically controlled aminolithiation step, 18 to 19, of which C–Li is
immediately converted to C–H by protonation with 20 and/or 1b.

474
HETEROCYCLES, Vol. 86, No. 1, 2012
*
Me
N
N
N
N Me
BuLi
3
Li
N
2b
1b
N
*
N
N
Li
N
N
Bu
H
i-Pr2N
20
H
i-Pr2N Li
*
21
18
19
1b
Scheme 4. Reaction pathway of intramolecular hydroamination.
Stereoinduction of intramolecular hydroamination
The cyclization would proceed through transition state A not through B to avoid the steric repulsion
between the bulky alkyl group of 3 (shown as R in A) and the aromatic ring of aminoalkene 1b as shown in
B to give (S)-product preferentially (Figure 2). The results of Table 1 supported this analysis; the aromatic
rings of 1b would contribute to the steric repulsion with the alkyl group of 3 in disfavored transition state B,
and thus the absence of aromatic ring in 1e reduces superiority of A over B to result in poorer
enantioselectivities (Table 1, entries 5 and 6). Moreover, the bulky N-protecting group of 1c caused another
steric repulsion against the alkyl group of 3 as shown in C, which also resulted in poor enantioselectivity
(Table 1, entry 3). A terminal phenyl group contributes to the selectivity of 5-exo/6-endo cyclization; in the
reaction of 1f, both 5-exo cyclization product 2f (33%) and 6-endo cyclization product 14f (7%) were
obtained, whereas 1b, 1d and 1e gave only 5-exo cyclization products. The absence of terminal phenyl
group reduces the steric hindrance at the terminal of the olefin, and consequently 6-endo cyclization
product 14f and dimer 15 were produced. Apparently, this chiral bisoxazoline–lithium amide catalyst
system is suitable for the asymmetric synthesis of 1-benzyltetrahydroisoquinolines and
1-benzylisoindolines.
R
R
R
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
N
N
N
N
N
Li
N
Li
N
Li
N
R
R
R
Me
OMe
(S)
Me
(R)
major
minor
A
B
C
Figure 2. Plausible stereoinduction model for a chiral bisoxazoline–lithium amide-catalyzed asymmetric
intramolecular hydroamination.
Asymmetric total synthesis of (S)-laudanosine
The asymmetric hydroamination was applicable for the total synthesis of opium alkaloid (S)-laudanosine
(29).14 Commercially available 6-bromoveratrylaldehyde 22 and 3,4-dimethoxystyrene 23 were coupled by

HETEROCYCLES, Vol. 86, No. 1, 2012
475
the Heck reaction to give stilbene 24 in 80% yield (Scheme 5). Henry reaction gave nitroalkene 25, whose
LiAlH4 reduction gave primary amine 26. Formylation followed by LiAlH4 reduction gave secondary
N-methylamine 28, a cyclization precursor of (S)-laudanosine 29. The hydroamination reaction of 28 was
carried out at –30 °C due to its low solubility at temperature lower than –30 °C to give desired
(S)-laudanosine 29 in 96% yield with 76% ee. Optically pure (S)-29 was obtained by recrystallization from
hexane/ethyl acetate in 64% yield. Thus, catalytic asymmetric synthesis of optically pure (S)-laudanosine
29 was accomplished in 33% overall yield.
MeO
MeO
NO2
MeO
MeO
CHO
MeNO2
NH4OAc
Pd(OAc)2.
K3PO4
MeO
MeO
CHO
Br
+
OMe
OMe
OMe
OMe
100 °C, 1 h
96%
DMA
140 °C, 1 h
80%
OMe
OMe
23
22
24
25
MeO
MeO
MeO
MeO
MeO
HCO2H
Ac2O
LiAlH4
LiAlH4
NH2
NHCHO
NHMe
MeO
rt, 2 h
88%
THF
rt, 6 h
86%
THF
rt, 48 h
92%
OMe
OMe
OMe
OMe
OMe
OMe
26
27
28
3a 0.5 eq
n-BuLi 0.45 eq
i-Pr2NH 0.3 eq
MeO
MeO
recrystallization
AcOEt/Hexane
NMe
(S)-29
>99% ee
toluene
64%
OMe
OMe
–30 °C, 26 h
96%, 76% ee
(S)-laudanosine (29)
Scheme 5. Asymmetric total synthesis of (S)-laudanosine.
CONCLUSION
In conclusion, the substituents of aminoalkenes significantly affected the efficiency of the chiral
bisoxazoline–lithium amide-catalyzed asymmetric hydroamination. This catalytic system was suitable for
the preparation of chiral 1-benzyltetrahydroisoquinolines and 1-benzylisoindolines. Asymmetric total
synthesis of (S)-laudanosine was achieved in 6 steps using catalytic asymmetric hydroamination as a key
step.
EXPERIMENTAL
1H NMR (500 MHz) and 13C NMR (125 MHz) were measured in CDCl3. Chemical shift values were
1
expressed in ppm relative to an internal reference of tetramethylsilane (0 ppm) in H NMR and CDCl3
(77.0 ppm) in 13C NMR. 13C peak multiplicity assignments were made based on DEPT data. IR

476
HETEROCYCLES, Vol. 86, No. 1, 2012
spectroscopy of oil and solid samples were measured as neat liquid films and KBr pellets, respectively.
Coupling constants were shown in Herz. Abbreviations are as follows: s, singlet; d, doublet; t, triplet; m,
multiplet; br, broad. The wave-numbers of maximum absorption peaks of IR spectroscopy were presented
in cm–1. Column chromatography was performed using silica gel as a stationary phase.
1-((E)-2-Nitrovinyl)-2-styrylbenzene (5)7: According to literature procedure,6 a solution of 45 (624 mg,
3 mmol) and NH4OAc (231 mg, 3 mmol) in dry MeNO2 (5.7 mL) was stirred at 100 °C for 1 h. After
concentration, the residue was partitioned between AcOEt and water. The aqueous layer was extracted
with AcOEt, and the combined organic extracts were washed with water and brine, dried over Na2SO4
and concentrated. Column chromatography (benzene/hexane 1/4-1/3) gave 5 (560 mg, 74%) as a bright
red oil.
(E)-2-(2-Styrylphenyl)ethanamine (6)7: To a suspension of LiAlH4 (7.75 g, 204 mmol) in dry Et2O (100
mL) was added 5 (10.25 g, 40.8 mmol) in dry Et2O (250 mL) at 0 °C and the mixture was stirred for 1 h.
The reaction was quenched with water (7.8 mL), 10% NaOH (7.8 mL) and water (20 mL). After filtration,
the filtrate was dried over K2CO3 and concentrated. Column chromatography (hexane/EtOAc 3/1, then
EtOH) gave 6 (6.32 g, 69 %) as a pale yellow oil.
N-(4-Methoxybenzyl)-2-(styrylphenyl)ethanamine (1c): A suspension of 6 (1.41 g, 6.32 mmol) and
p-anisaldehyde (856 mg, 6.32 mmol) in water (10 mL) was stirred vigorously at rt for 3 h. To the mixture
was added CHCl3 (20 mL) and it was stirred for 1 h at the same temperature. The mixture was extracted
with CHCl3, and the combined organic extracts were washed with brine and dried over K2CO3.
Concentration gave 2.4 g of imine as a pale yellow oil. To a suspension of LiAlH4 (932 mg, 25.3 mmol)
in dry Et2O (5 mL) was added imine (2.4 g) in dry Et2O (4 mL) at 0 °C. The mixture was stirred for 1 h at
0 °C, and quenched with water (0.15 mL), 10% NaOH (0.15 mL) and water (0.45 mL) and then filtered
through a Celite pad. The filtrate was dried over K2CO3 and concentrated. Column chromatography
(AcOEt/hexane 1/5) gave 1c (1.87 g, 86%) as a pale yellow oil. 1H NMR: 1.50 (1H, br s), 2.89 (2H, t, J =
7.3), 2.99 (2H, t, J = 7.3), 3.75 (2H, s), 3.76 (3H, s), 6.80 (2H, d, J = 8.6), 6.99 (1H, d, J = 15.9),
13
7.18-7.40 (9H, m), 7.50 (2H, d, J = 8.6), 7.61 (1H, m). C NMR: 34.0, 50.0, 53.2, 55.2, 113.8, 126.0,
126.2, 126.65, 126.74, 127.68, 127.72, 128.7, 129.2, 130.1, 130.5, 136.4, 137.7, 137.9. IR: 3024, 2932,
2831, 1612, 1512. EIMS m/z: 343 (M+). Anal. Calcd for C24H25NO: C, 83.93; H, 7.34; N, 4.08. Found: C,
84.19; H, 7.46; N, 4.03.
(E)-N-(2-Styrylbenzyl)prop-2-en-1-amine (1d): To a solution of 4 (10.0 g, 48 mmol) in MeOH (100 mL)
was added dropwise allylamine (5.4 mL, 72 mmol) at rt and the mixture was stirred for 1 h. Then the
solution was cooled to 0 °C. To the solution was added portionwise NaBH4 (1.83 g, 48 mmol) over 5 min.
The mixture was stirred for 1 h and then concentrated. After addition of water (200 mL), the whole was

HETEROCYCLES, Vol. 86, No. 1, 2012
477
extracted with ether (200+100+100 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with brine and dried
over K2CO3. Concentration and column chromatography (hexane/EtOAc 5/1-1/2) gave 1d (11.4 g, 95%) as
a colorless oil. 1H NMR: 1.34 (1H, br s), 3.33 (2H, d, J = 6.0), 3.91 (2H, s), 5.13 (1H, dd, J = 10.2, 1.5),
5.23 (1H, dd, J = 17.0, 1.5), 5.96 (1H, m), 7.04 (1H, d, J = 16.0), 7.20-7.40 (6H, m), 7.48 (1H, d, J = 16.0),
7.53 (2H, d, J = 7.7), 7.62-7.65 (1H, m). 13C NMR: 50.9 (CH2), 52.0 (CH2), 116.2 (CH2), 125.9 (CH), 126.0
(CH), 126.7 (CH), 127.5 (CH), 127.6 (CH), 127.7 (CH), 128.7 (CH), 129.5, (CH), 130.7 (CH), 136.6 (C),
136.9 (CH), 137.6 (C), 137.7 (C). IR: 3325, 3063, 3024, 2816, 1597, 1496, 1450. EIMS m/z: 249 (M+).
Anal. Calcd for C18H19N: C, 86.70; H, 7.68; N, 5.62. Found: C, 86.77; H, 7.69; N, 5.61.
(E)-N-Allyl-5-phenylpent-4-en-1-amine (1e)9,10: Under argon atmosphere, to a solution of benzaldehyde
(5.1 mL, 50 mmol) in THF (72 mL) was added vinylmagnesium chloride (1.48 M, 41 mL, 60 mmol) at
0 °C. The solution was stirred for 1 h, diluted with Et2O (100 mL), and then quenched with satd NH4Cl
(30 mL). The mixture was extracted with Et2O (50 + 50 mL) and the combined organic extracts were
concentrated to give 7 (7.83 g) as pale yellow oil. To a solution of 7 in xylene (125 mL) were added
HC(OEt)3 (34 mL, 250 mmol) and EtCO2H (0.5 g, 5 mmol) under argon atmosphere. The solution was
heated at reflux for 2.5 h, and then diluted with AcOEt (400 mL). The whole was washed with satd
NaHCO3 (100 mL), water (100 mL) and brine (100 mL), and then dried over Na2SO4. Concentration gave
8 (13.0 g) as a pale yellow oil. To a solution of 8 in dioxane (95 mL), MeOH (16 mL) and water (50 mL)
was added KOH (8.4 g, 150 mmol). The whole was stirred for 1 h at rt and then concentrated to remove
MeOH. The residue was diluted with Et2O (300 mL) and extracted with satd. aq. NaHCO3 (300 + 100 +
100 mL). The combined aqueous layers were acidified with 10% HCl and extracted with Et2O (500 + 200
+ 100 mL). The combined organic extracts were concentrated to give 9 (5.9 g) as a white solid. To a
solution of 9 in THF (125 mL) were added Et3N (5.0 mL, 44 mmol), ClCO2Et (4.5 mL, 44 mmol) and
allylamine (5 mL, 67 mmol) at 0 °C under argon atmosphere. The mixture was stirred for 10 min at 0 °C
and for 20 h at rt, and then quenched with satd. aq. NaHCO3 (50 mL). The whole was extracted with
AcOEt (100 + 100 + 100 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with water (100 mL) and brine
(100 mL), dried over Na2SO4, and concentrated to give 10 (7.9 g) as an orange oil. To a suspension of
LiAlH4 (6.4 g, 168 mmol) in Et2O (100 mL) was added a solution of 10 in Et2O (20 mL) and THF (130
mL) at 0 °C under argon atmosphere. The reaction was stirred for 20 h at rt, and was quenched with water
(6.4 mL), 10% NaOH (6.4 mL) and water (19.2 mL). After filtration, the filtrate was dried over K2CO3
and concentrated. Column chromatography (acetone/hexane 1/1) gave 1e (5.3 g, 5 steps 50%) as a pale
yellow oil. 1H NMR: 1.21 (1H, br s), 1.68 (2H, tt, J = 7.3, 7.3), 2.26 (2H, dt, J = 7.3, 7.3), 2.67 (2H, t, J =
7.3), 3.26 (2H, d, J = 5.8), 5.08 (1H, d, J = 10.4), 5.17 (1H, d, J = 17.1), 5.91 (1H, m), 6.22 (1H, dt, J =
13
15.9, 7.3), 6.40 (1H, d, J = 15.9), 7.19 (1H, m), 7.27–7.35 (4H, m). C NMR: 29.7 (CH2), 30.7 (CH2),
48.9 (CH2), 52.5 (CH2), 115.7 (CH2), 125.9 (CH), 126.9 (CH), 128.5 (CH), 130.1 (CH), 130.4 (CH),

478
HETEROCYCLES, Vol. 86, No. 1, 2012
137.0 (CH), 137.8 (C). IR: 3364, 2924, 1450. Anal. Calcd for C14H19N: C, 83.53; H, 9.51; N, 6.96.
Found: C, 83.43; H, 9.81; N, 6.78.
1-Bromo-2-vinylbenzene (12)11a: Under argon atmosphere, to a suspension of MePPh3Br (134 g, 375
mmol) in dry THF (335 mL) was added n-BuLi (1.6 N in hexane, 234 mL, 375 mmol) at 0 °C. The
mixture was stirred for 2 h. A solution of 2-bromobenzaldehyde 11 (62.0 g, 335 mmol) in dry THF (335
mL) was added at 0 °C. The whole was stirred for 19 h at rt and quenched with brine and extracted with
benzene. The organic layers were washed with brine, dried over Na2SO4 and concentrated. Hexane (1.7
L) was added to the residue and the mixture was stirred for 1 h at 50 °C and filtered off Ph3P=O. The
filtrate was concentrated and then distilled (57 °C, 4 mmHg) to give 12 (35 g 57%) as a colorless oil. 1H
NMR: 5.35 (1H, d, J = 11.0), 5.69 (1H, d, J = 17.4), 7.05 (1H, dd, J = 17.4, 11.0), 7.09 (1H, t, J = 7.7),
7.25 (1H, t, J = 7.7), 7.54 (2H, d, J = 7.7). IR: 3063, 2361, 1836, 1628, 1589, 1466, 1412. EIMS m/z: 184
(M+2), 182 (M+), 103 (M+ – Br).
2-Vinylbenzaldehyde (13)11a: Under argon atmosphere, to a solution of 12 (20.0 g, 109 mmol) in dry
THF (140 mL) was added n-BuLi (1.6 N in hexane, 69 mL, 110 mmol) at –78 °C. The mixture was
stirred for 0.5 h at the same temperature, and then treated with Me2NCHO (8.6 mL, 111 mmol) in dry
THF (40 mL). The mixture was stirred for 1 h at –78 °C and for 1 h at rt, and then quenched with brine at
0 °C and extracted with CHCl3. The organic layer was washed with brine, dried over Na2SO4 and
1
concentrated. Distillation (58 °C, 0.3 mmHg) gave 13 (9.8 g, 68%) as a pale yellow oil. H NMR: 5.51
(1H, d, J = 11.0), 5.70 (1H, d, J = 17.4), 7.40-7.47 (1H, m), 7.54 (1H, dd, J = 11.0, 17.4), 7.56-7.61 (2H,
m), 7.83 (1H, d, J = 7.4), 10.29 (1H, s). 13C NMR: 119.7, 127.7, 128.2, 131.5, 133.1, 133.6, 134.1, 140.8,
192.7. IR: 3062, 2846, 2738, 1697, 1596, 1566, 1481, 1411, 1296, 1203. EIMS m/z: 132 (M+), 103 (M+ –
CHO).
N-Methyl-1-(2-vinylphenyl)methanamine (1f)11c,d: A 40% aqueous solution of MeNH2 (20.8 mL, 240
mmol) was added to a solution of 13 (10.6 g, 80 mmol) in MeOH (180 mL). After stirring at rt for 4 h,
NaBH4 (3.04 g, 80 mmol) was added at 0 °C. The mixture was stirred for 1 h at rt and quenched with
brine and concentrated. The resulting aqueous residue was extracted with CHCl3. The organic layer was
washed with brine, dried over K2CO3 and concentrated. Distillation (62 °C, 0.4 mmHg) gave 1f (12.7 g,
68%) as a colorless oil. 1H NMR: 1.42 (1H, br s), 2.47 (3H, s), 3.79 (2H, s), 5.33 (1H, dd, J = 1.2, 11.0),
13
5.69 (1H, dd, J = 1.2, 17.4), 7.06 (1H, dd, J = 11.0, 17.4), 7.15-7.35 (3H, m), 7.52 (1H, d, J = 6.7). C
NMR: 36.2 (CH3), 53.7 (CH2), 115.9 (CH2), 125.8 (CH), 127.4 (CH), 127.7 (CH), 129.7 (CH), 134.2
(CH), 136.9 (C), 137.2 (C). IR: 3325, 3063, 3024, 2932, 2847, 2793, 1628, 1481, 1442. EIMS m/z: 147
(M+), 132 (M+ – CH3).
General procedure of asymmetric hydroamination. 2-Allyl-1-benzylisoindoline (2d) (Table 1, entry
4): To a solution of 3c (0.53 g, 2.0 mmol) and i-Pr2NH (0.64 mL, 4.5 mmol) in toluene (40 mL) was

HETEROCYCLES, Vol. 86, No. 1, 2012
479
added n-BuLi (1.57 M in hexane, 0.72 mL, 1 mmol) over 1 min at –78 °C under argon atmosphere. After
stirring for 10 min, 1d (1.24 g, 5.0 mmol) in toluene (10 mL) was added over 10 min. The brown solution
was stirred for 2 h at –40 °C, and then quenched with satd NH4Cl (10 mL) and 10% K2CO3 (10 mL). The
separated aqueous layer was extracted with Et2O (50 + 25 + 25 mL). The combined organic layers were
washed with brine (30 mL), dried over K2CO3, and concentrated. Column chromatography
(AcOEt/hexane 1/12) gave 2d8 (1.22 g, 98%) as a pale yellow oil of [α]25D + 44.4 (c 1.08, CHCl3). Ee was
determined by HPLC analysis to be 83% (Daicel Chiralpak AS-H×2, hexane/i-PrOH/Et3N 200/1/0.1, 1
mL/min, 254 nm, major 8.4 min and minor 8.9 min).
2-(4-Methoxybenzyl)-1-benzyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinoline (2c): a colorless oil. []25D +0.48 (c 1.04,
CHCl3). 11% ee (HPLC, Daicel Chiralcel OJ-H, hexane/i-PrOH 100/1, 1.0 mL/min, 254 nm, minor 25.6
1
min and major 35.4 min). H NMR: 2.52-2.56 (1H, m), 2.83-2.89 (2H, m), 2.94-3.00 (1H, m), 3.09-3.13
(1H, m), 3.30-3.36 (1H, m), 3.65 (1H, d, J = 13.2), 3.70 (1H, d, J = 13.2), 3.79 (3H, s), 3.87 (1H, m), 6.74
(2H, d, J = 8.6), 6.83-6.84 (1H, m), 7.00 (2H, d, J = 8.6), 7.06-7.15 (5H, m), 7.19-7.26 (3H, m). 13C NMR:
24.4, 42.4, 42.8, 55.2, 57.2, 62.4, 113.5, 125.5, 125.8, 126.1, 127.9, 128.3, 129.0, 129.8, 131.5, 134.7, 138.2,
140.3, 158.5. IR: 3024, 2932, 2831, 1612, 1512. FABMS m/z: 344 (M+H+). Anal. Calcd for C24H25NO: C,
83.93; H, 7.34; N, 4.08. Found: C, 84.15; H, 7.41; N, 3.98.
1-Allyl-2-benzylpyrrolidine (2e): a colorless oil. [α]25 −13.6 (c 1.15, CHCl3). 18% ee (HPLC, Daicel
D
Chiralcel OJ-H, hexane/i-PrOH 100/1, 0.5 mL/min, 254 nm, major 4.9 min and minor 4.4 min). 1H NMR:
1.54 (1H, m), 1.64 (1H, m), 1.67-1.78 (2H, m), 2.21 (1H, m), 2.45 (1H, dd, J = 13.1, 9.5), 2.56 (1H, m),
2.89 (1H, dd, J = 13.2, 7.6), 3.05 (1H, dd, J = 13.1, 4.0), 3.12 (1H, m), 3.55 (1H, dd, J = 13.2, 5.5), 5.12
13
(1H, d, J = 10.1), 5.22 (1H, dd, J = 17.1, 1.2), 5.96 (1H, m), 7.15-7.20 (3H, m), 7.25-7.29 (2H, m). C
NMR: 21.5 (CH2), 30.2 (CH2), 40.6 (CH2), 53.8 (CH2), 57.1 (CH2), 65.2 (CH), 116.6 (CH2), 125.7 (CH),
128.0 (CH), 129.0 (CH), 135.9 (CH), 140.0 (C). IR: 2963, 2793, 1643, 1450, 1157, 1119, 995, 918, 748.
EIMS: 201 (M+). Anal. Calcd for C14H19N: C, 83.53; H, 9.51; N, 6.96. Found: C, 83.81; H, 9.63; N, 6.93.
1,2-Dimethylisoindoline (2f)15 a colorless oil. [α]25 +19.0 (c 0.66, CHCl3). 43% ee (HPLC, Daicel
D
1
Chiralcel AD-H, hexane/i-PrOH 100/1, 0.5 mL/min, 254 nm, major 11.2 min and minor 12.6 min). H
NMR: 1.43 (3H, d, J = 6.1), 2.57 (3H, s), 3.64 (2H, m), 4.24 (1H, d, J = 11.6), 7.09-7.14 (1H, m),
13
7.17-7.25 (3H, m). C NMR: 18.0 (CH3), 39.8 (CH3), 60.5 (CH2), 65.3 (CH), 121.6 (CH), 122.0 (CH),
126.8 (CH x 2), 139.4 (C), 144.9 (C). IR: 3387, 3040, 2770, 1697, 1458. EIMS m/z: 147 (M+), 132 (M+ –
CH3).
2-Methyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinoline (14f)16: a colorless oil. 1H NMR: 2.46 (3H, s), 2.68 (2H, t, J =
6.2), 2.93 (2H, t, J = 6.2), 3.58 (2H, s), 7.00-7.03 (1H, m), 7.09-7.16 (3H, m). 13C NMR: 29.1 (CH2), 46.1
(CH3), 52.8 (CH2), 57.9 (CH2), 125.6 (CH), 126.0 (CH), 126.4 (CH), 128.6 (CH), 133.8 (C), 134.7 (C).

480
HETEROCYCLES, Vol. 86, No. 1, 2012
IR: 3364, 3024, 2924, 2777, 1705, 1589, 1458. EIMS m/z: 147 (M+).
1
N-Methyl-2-(2-((methylamino)methyl)phenyl)-N-(2-vinylbenzyl)ethanamine (15): a colorless oil. H
NMR: 1.58 (1H, br s), 2.30 (3H, s), 2.44 (3H, s), 2.60-2.64 (2H, m), 2.86-2.90 (2H, m), 3.57 (2H, s), 3.69
13
(2H, s), 5.25 (1H, m), 5.64 (1H, m), 7.09-7.53 (9H, m). C NMR: 30.2 (CH2), 36.2 (CH3), 42.0 (CH3),
53.2 (CH2), 58.9 (CH2), 60.0 (CH2), 115.1 (CH2), 125.6 (CH), 126.1 (CH), 127.1 (CH), 127.3 (CH),
128.3 (CH), 129.0 (CH), 129.8 (CH), 130.3 (CH), 134.7 (CH), 136.0 (C), 137.6 (C), 137.9 (C), 138.8 (C).
IR: 3325, 3063, 3017, 2939, 2839, 2785, 1628, 1450. HRMS-FAB m/z: [M+H]+ calcd for C20H27N2,
295.2169; found, 295.2177.
Determination of the absolute configuration of 2d.
(S)-1-Benzylisoindoline (16): Under argon atmosphere, to a solution of 2d (500 mg, 2.0 mmol, 83% ee)
in MeCN/water (4/1, 25 mL) was added RhCl(PPh3)3 (32 mg, 0.1 mmol). The mixture was heated at
reflux for 2 h and diluted with AcOEt. To the mixture was added water (20 mL), and the whole was
extracted with AcOEt (30+20+10 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with brine and dried
over K2CO3. Concentration and column chromatography (hexane/AcOEt/Et3N 10/2/1) gave 168 mg (40%
yield) of 1-benzylisoindoline 16 as a pale yellow oil. [α]25D −22.7 (c 1.00, CHCl3). 1H NMR: 1.94 (1H, br
s), 2.87 (1H, dd, J = 13.6, 8.4), 3.13 (1H, dd, J = 13.6, 5.2), 4.15 (1H, d, J = 13.7), 4.20 (1H, d, J = 13.7),
13
4.65 (1H, dd, J = 8.4, 5.2), 7.09 (1H, d, J = 6.7), 7.17-7.24 (6H, m), 7.28-7.31 (2H, m). C NMR: 42.7
(CH2), 51.3 (CH2), 64.6 (CH), 122.4 (CH), 122.5 (CH), 126.3 (CH), 126.5 (CH), 127.0 (CH), 128.4 (CH),
129.3 (CH), 139.0 (C), 141.6 (C), 144.0 (C). IR: 3063, 3024, 2916, 2839, 1597, 1458. EIMS m/z: 209
(M+). Anal. Calcd for C15H15N: C, 86.08; H, 7.22; N, 6.69. Found: C, 85.88; H, 7.46; N, 6.71.
(S)-1-Benzylisoindoline-2-carbaldehyde (17): A solution of 16 (100 mg, 0.48 mmol) in ethylformate
(7.7 mL, 48 mmol) was heated at reflux for 0.5 h. Concentration and column chromatography
(hexane/AcOEt 1/1) gave 105 mg (93% yield) of 17 as a red oil. [α]25 +6.53 (c 1.00, CHCl3). The
D
rotamers with 70:30 ratio were observed in 1H NMR. 1H NMR: Major Rotamer: 3.01 (1H, dd, J = 13.8,
6.7), 3.16 (1H, dd, J = 13.8, 5.2), 4.32 (1H, d, J = 15.6), 4.84 (1H, d, J = 15.6), 5.31 (1H, dd, J = 6.7, 5.2),
6.90 (1H, m), 7.04-7.32 (8H, m), 8.02 (1H, s); Minor Rotamer: 3.24 (1H, dd, J = 13.2, 2.8), 3.32 (1H, dd,
J = 13.2, 7.0), 4.13 (1H, d, J = 13.4), 4.64 (1H, d, J = 13.4), 5.58 (1H, m), 7.04-7.32 (9H, m), 8.41 (1H,
13
s). C NMR: 39.3 (CH2), 44.5 (CH2), 49.2 (CH2), 51.4 (CH2), 62.3 (CH), 64.3 (CH), 122.5 (CH), 123.0
(CH), 123.1 (CH), 123.5 (CH), 126.4 (CH), 127.0 (CH), 127.5 (CH), 127.7 (CH), 127.8 (CH), 127.9 (CH),
128.2 (CH), 128.6 (CH), 129.8 (CH), 130.0 (CH), 135.8 (C), 136.1 (C), 136.5 (C), 139.3 (C), 139.6 (C),
161.5 (CH), 161.7 (CH). IR: 1651. FABMS m/z: 238 [M+H]+. Anal. Calcd for C16H15NO: C, 80.98; H,
6.37; N, 5.90. Found: C, 80.90; H, 6.34; N, 5.95.
(S)-1-Benzyl-2-methylisoindoline (2b): Under argon atmosphere, to a solution of 17 (100 mg, 0.42
mmol) in THF (4.7 mL) was added BH3–THF solution (0.9 N in THF, 2.3 mL, 2.1 mmol) at room

HETEROCYCLES, Vol. 86, No. 1, 2012
481
temperature over 2 min. The mixture was heated at reflux for 15 min and added water (4.7 mL), and then
heated at reflux for 2.5 h. The whole was extracted with AcOEt (10 + 5+ 5 mL). The combined organic
layers were washed with brine and dried over K2CO3. Concentration and column chromatography
(hexane/AcOEt 1/1) gave 92 mg (98% yield) of (S)-2b13 as a colorless oil. [α]25 +75.5 (c 1.05, CHCl3).
D
1H NMR: 2.47 (3H, s), 3.04 (1H, dd, J = 14.1, 7.1), 3.12 (1H, dd, J = 14.1, 5.8), 3.67 (1H, d, J = 13.1),
13
4.01 (1H, dd, J = 7.1, 5.8), 4.28 (1H, d, J = 13.1), 6.88 (1H, d, J = 7.7), 7.09-7.33 (8H, m). C NMR:
41.2, 41.3, 60.9, 71.4, 122.1, 122.6, 126.2, 126.6, 126.9, 128.4, 129.6, 139.4, 139.7, 143.7. IR: 3026,
2925, 2771, 1601, 1454, 1354, 1151. FABMS m/z: 224 [M+H]+.
Asymmetric total synthesis of (S)-laudanosine.
(E)-2-(3,4-Dimethoxystyryl)-4,5-dimethoxybenzaldehyde (24): Under argon atmosphere, to a
suspension of K3PO4 (50 g, 236 mmol), 22 (41.3 g, 169 mmol) and 23 (111 g, 674 mmol) in
N,N-dimethylacetamide (339 mL) was added Pd(OAc)2 (3.79 g, 16.9 mmol). The mixture was heated at
140 °C for 0.5 h. Additional Pd(OAc)2 (1.26 g, 5.63 mmol) was added and the mixture was stirred for 0.5
h at the same temperature. The mixture was poured onto ice water, filtered through a Celite pad and
extracted with CHCl3. The organic extracts were washed with water and brine, and dried over Na2SO4.
Concentration and column chromatography (AcOEt/hexane 10/1, then AcOEt) followed by
recrystallization from AcOEt/hexane gave 24 (49 g, 89%) as yellow needles of mp 158–159 °C. 1H NMR:
3.92, 3.96, 3.97, and 4.03 (each 3H, s), 6.89 (1H, d, J = 8.3), 6.91 (1H, d, J = 15.9), 7.09-7.11 (3H, m),
13
7.38 (1H, s), 7.75 (1H, d, J = 15.9), 10.33 (1H, s). C NMR: 55.86, 55.91, 56.0, and 56.1 (CH3 x 4),
108.7 (CH), 109.0 (CH), 111.1 (CH), 111.3 (CH), 119.2 (C), 120.3 (CH), 121.6 (CH), 126.4 (C), 130.0
(C), 133.2 (CH), 136.0 (C), 149.3 (C), 149.5 (C), 153.8 (C), 190.2 (CH). IR (nujor): 1663, 1597, 1512.
EIMS m/z: 328 (M+). Anal. Calcd for C19H20O5: C, 69.50; H, 6.14. Found: C, 69.69; H, 6.08.
4-(4,5-Dimethoxy-2-((E)-2-nitrovinyl)styryl)-1,2-dimethoxybenzene (25)17: A solution of 24 (656 mg,
2 mmol) and NH4OAc (154 mg, 2 mmol) in dry nitromethane (3.8 mL) was stirred at 100 °C for 2 h and
then concentrated. The residue was partitioned between AcOEt and water. The aqueous layer was
extracted with AcOEt, and the combined organic extracts were washed with water and brine, and dried
over Na2SO4. Concentration and column chromatography (AcOEt/hexane 2/1) followed by
recrystallization from AcOEt/hexane gave 25 (712 mg, 96%) as red needles of mp 180–181 °C. 1H NMR:
3.93, 3.95, 3.97, and 4.00 (each 3H, s), 6.86 (1H, d, J = 15.9), 6.90 (1H, d, J = 8.3), 6.96 (1H, s), 7.07 (1H,
d, J = 2.2), 7.08 (1H, s), 7.11 (1H, dd, J = 2.2, 8.3), 7.24 (1H, d, J = 15.9), 7.51 (1H, d, J = 13.2), 8.45
13
(1H, d, J = 13.2). C NMR: 55.90 (CH3), 55.91 (CH3), 56.0 (CH3 x 2), 109.1 (CH), 109.2 (CH), 109.4
(CH), 111.3 (CH), 120.2 (CH), 120.3 (C), 122.3 (CH), 129.8 (C), 133.1 (CH), 134.5 (C), 136.0 (CH),
136.7 (CH), 148.9 (C), 149.3 (C), 149.6 (C), 152.7 (C). IR: 3109, 1620, 1597, 1516. EIMS m/z: 371 (M+).
Anal. Calcd for C20H21NO6: C, 64.68; H, 5.70; N, 3.77. Found: C, 64.47; H, 5.78; N, 3.60.

482
HETEROCYCLES, Vol. 86, No. 1, 2012
(E)-2-(2-(3,4-Dimethoxystyryl)-4,5-dimethoxyphenyl)ethanamine (26): To a suspension of LiAlH4
(5.28 g, 139 mmol) in dry THF (150 mL) was added a solution of 25 (12.9 g, 34.8 mmol) in dry Et2O
(550 mL) under ice-water bath. After stirring at rt for 6 h, the excess of LiAlH4 was successively
quenched with water (5.3 mL), 10% NaOH (5.3 mL) and water (15.9 mL). After filtration, the filtrate was
dried over K2CO3. Concentration and column chromatography (AcOEt, then CHCl3/EtOH/25% aq. NH3
160/9/1) gave 26 (4.11 g, 86%) as a right brown oil. 1H NMR: 1.25 (2H, br s), 2.88 (2H, t, J = 6.7), 2.95
(2H, t, J = 6.7), 3.89, 3.90, 3.938, and 3.943 (each 3H, s), 6.70 (1H, s), 6.85 (1H, d, J = 15.9), 6.87 (1H, d,
J = 8.3), 7.03-7.09 (2H, m), 7.11 (1H, s), 7.17 (1H, d, J = 15.9). 13C NMR: 37.0 (CH2), 43.4 (CH2), 55.84
(CH3), 55.87 (CH3), 55.88 (CH3), 55.92 (CH3), 108.6 (CH), 109.3 (CH), 111.3 (CH), 113.1 (CH), 119.2
(CH), 124.2 (CH), 128.3 (CH), 128.8 (C), 130.2 (C), 130.9 (C), 147.7 (C), 148.5 (C), 148.8 (C), 149.1 (C).
IR: 3368, 3306, 1605, 1516. EIMS m/z: 343 (M+). Anal. Calcd for C20H25NO4: C, 69.95; H, 7.34; N, 4.08.
Found: C, 69.80; H, 7.44; N, 4.02.
(E)-N-(2-(3,4-Dimethoxystyryl)-4,5-dimethoxyphenyl)formamide (27): A mixture of 26 (31 g, 90
mmol), HCO2H (100 mL, 2.7 mol) and Ac2O (86 mL, 0.9 mol) was stirred at rt for 2 h. The mixture was
diluted with water, basified with 10% NaOH and extracted with CHCl3. The organic extracts were
washed with brine and dried over Na2SO4. Concentration and column chromatography (AcOEt/CHCl3 1/1,
then CHCl3/EtOH/25% aq. NH3 80/9/1) followed by recrystallization from AcOEt/hexane gave 27 (29.4
1
g, 88%) as colorless needles of mp 131.5–132.5 °C. H NMR: 2.98 and 3.52 (each 2H, t, J = 7.1), 3.90,
3.91, 3.95, and 3.99 (each 3H, s), 5.64 (1H, br s), 6.68 (1H, s), 6.87 (1H, d, J = 15.9), 6.88 (1H, d, J = 8.3),
13
7.09 (1H, dd, J = 1.6, 8.3), 7.14 (1H, s), 7.16 (1H, d, J = 1.6), 7.27 (1H, d, J = 15.9), 8.16 (1H, s). C
NMR: 32.7 (CH2), 39.6 (CH2), 55.93 (CH3), 55.97 (CH3), 55.99 (CH3), 56.00 (CH3), 108.5 (CH), 109.0
(CH), 111.3 (CH), 113.0 (CH), 119.8 (CH), 123.6 (CH), 128.8 (CH), 128.9 (C), 129.2 (C), 130.7 (C),
148.1 (C), 148.7 (C), 149.0 (C), 149.3 (C), 161.3 (CH). IR: 3364, 1674, 1605, 1516. EIMS m/z: 371 (M+).
Anal. Calcd for C21H25NO5: C, 67.91; H, 6.78; N, 3.77. Found: C, 67.69; H, 6.81; N, 3.73
(E)-2-(2-(3,4-Dimethoxystyryl)-4,5-dimethoxyphenyl)-N-methylethanamine (28)18: To a 1.0 M THF
solution of LiAlH4 (17.8 mL, 17.8 mmol) was added 27 (1.65 g, 4.46 mmol) in dry THF (80 mL) under
ice-water bath. The mixture was stirred for 48 h at rt and then quenched with water (0.7 mL), 10% NaOH
(0.7 mL) and water (2.1 mL) at 0 °C. After filtration, the filtrate was dried over K2CO3 and concentrated.
Column chromatography (AcOEt/CHCl3 1/1, then CHCl3/ethanol/25% aq. NH3 80/9/1) followed by
1
recrystallization from AcOEt/hexane gave 28 (1.47 g, 92%) as colorless needles of mp 108–109 °C. H
NMR: 1.51 (1H, br s), 2.46 (3H, s), 2.82 (2H, t, J = 7.1), 2.93 (2H, t, J = 7.1), 3.90, 3.91, 3.94, and 3.95
(each 3H, s), 6.72 (1H, s), 6.86 (1H, d, J = 15.9), 6.87 (1H, d, J = 8.2), 7.05 (1H, d, J = 1.8), 7.08 (1H, dd,
J = 1.8, 8.2), 7.11 (1H, s), 7.20 (1H, d, J = 15.9). 13C NMR: 33.3, 36.3, 53.0, 55.80, 55.82, 55.85, 108.5,
109.1, 111.3, 113.0, 119.3, 124.0, 128.2, 128.6, 130.3, 130.9, 147.6, 148.5, 148.7, 149.1. IR: 3317, 1605,

HETEROCYCLES, Vol. 86, No. 1, 2012
483
1516. EIMS m/z: 357 (M+).
(S)-(+)-Laudanosine (29)19: Under argon atmosphere, to a solution of 3a (147 mg, 0.5 mmol) and
i-Pr2NH (0.04 mL) in toluene (5 mL) was added n-BuLi (1.6 N in hexane, 0.09 mL, 0.15 mmol) at –78 °C,
and the solution was stirred for 10 min. A solution of 28 (179 mg, 0.5 mmol) in toluene (10 mL) was
added over 2.5 h by a syringe pump at –30 °C. After addition of n-BuLi (1.6 N in hexane, 0.09 mL, 0.15
mmol), another solution of 28 (179 mg, 0.5 mmol) in toluene (10 mL) was added over 2.5 h. Additional
n-BuLi (1.6 N in hexane, 0.09 mL, 0.15 mmol) was added and then the solution was stirred for 21 h at the
same temperature.20 The reaction mixture was quenched with satd. aq. NH4Cl (5 mL) and basified with
10% aqueous K2CO3. The whole was extracted with AcOEt. The organic extracts were washed with brine
and dried over K2CO3. Concentration and column chromatography (AcOEt/hexane 1/1, then AcOEt) gave
29 (344 mg, 96%) as a pale yellow solid of mp 88–90 °C and [α]25 +35.9 (c 1.05, CHCl3) and 3a (146
D
mg) quantitatively. 76% ee (HPLC, Daicel Chiralcel OD-H, hexane/i-PrOH 7/3, 1.0 mL/min, 254 nm,
major 7.2 min and minor 17.9 min). Recrystallization of 29 (76% ee) from AcOEt/hexane afforded 29
(220 mg, 64%) of 99% ee as a white solid of mp 85–86 °C and [α]25 +57.3 (c 0.98, CHCl3).19 (Lit.19b:
D
mp 87–88 °C and [α]29D +54.4 (c 0.20, CHCl3). 1H NMR: 2.54 (3H, s), 2.58 (1H, m), 2.73-2.86 (3H, m),
3.12-3.20 (2H, m), 3.57 (3H, s), 3.69 (1H, m), 3.79 (3H, s), 3.84 (3H, s), 3.85 (3H, s), 6.07 (1H, s), 6.56
(1H, s), 6.60 (1H, d, J = 1.8), 6.64 (1H, dd, J = 1.8, 8.0), 6.77 (1H, d, J = 8.0). 13C NMR: 25.5 (CH2), 40.8
(CH2), 42.6 (CH3), 46.9 (CH2), 55.5 (CH3), 55.68 (CH3), 55.73 (CH3), 55.8 (CH3), 64.8 (CH), 111.0 (CH),
111.1 (CH), 111.2 (CH), 113.0 (CH), 121.8 (CH), 126.1 (C), 129.3 (C), 132.5 (C), 146.3 (C), 147.26 (C),
147.31 (C), 148.6 (C). IR: 2932, 2839, 2793, 1605, 1512. EIMS m/z: 357 (M+).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This research was partially supported by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (A) and Grant-in-Aid for
Young Scientists (B) from JSPS.
REFERENCES (AND NOTES)
1. T. E. Müller, K. C. Hultzsch, M. Yus, F. Foubelo, and M. Tada, Chem. Rev., 2008, 108, 3795.
2. T. Ogata, A. Ujihara, S. Tsuchida, T. Shimizu, A. Kaneshige, and K. Tomioka, Tetrahedron Lett.,
2007, 48, 6648.
3. For chiral lithium amide-catalyzed intramolecular asymmetric hydroamination: (a) P. H. Martinez, K.
C. Hultzsch, and F. Hampel, Chem. Commun., 2006, 2221; (b) J. Deschamp, C. Olier, E. Schulz, R.
Guillot, J. Hannedouche, and J. Collin, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2010, 352, 2171; (c) J. Deschamp, J.
Collin, J. Hannedouche, and E. Schulz, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2011, 3329.

484
HETEROCYCLES, Vol. 86, No. 1, 2012
4. Racemic intramolecular hydroamination for the synthesis of tetrahydroisoquinolines: W. A. L.
Otterlo, R. Pathak, C. B. Koning, and M. A. Fernandes, Tetrahedron Lett., 2004, 45, 9561.
5. (a) Q. Yao, E. P. Kinney, and Z. Yang, J. Org. Chem., 2003, 68, 7528; (b) M. Dhar and A.
Bhattacharjya, Indian. J. Chem., Sect. B, 2001, 40, 1140.
6. A. Poschalko, S. Welzig, M. Treu, S. Nerdinger, K. Mereiter, and U. Jordis, Tetrahedron, 2002, 58,
1513.
7. F. D. Lewis, D. M. Bassani, E. L. Burch, B. E. Cohen, J. A. Engleman, G. D. Reddy, S. Schneider, W.
Jaeger, P. Gedeck, and M. Gahr, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1995, 117, 660.
8. S. Tsuchida, A. Kaneshige, T. Ogata, H. Baba, Y. Yamamoto, and K. Tomioka, Org. Lett., 2008, 16,
3635.
9. A. Briot, C. Baehr, R. Brouillard, A. Wagner, and C. Mioskowski, J. Org. Chem., 2004, 69, 1374.
10. (a) J. Pietruszka and N. Schoene, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2004, 5011; (b) A. Joosten, E. Lambert, J.
Vasse, and J. Szymoniak, Org. Lett., 2010, 12, 5128.
11. (a) S. Hibino, E. Sugino, Y. Adachi, K. Nomi, K. Sato, and K. Fukumoto, Heterocycles, 1989, 28,
275; (b) W.-Y. Qi, T.-S. Zhu, and M.-H. Xu, Org. Lett., 2011, 13, 3410; (c) N. Philippe, F. Denivet,
J.-L. Vasse, J. S. O. Santos, V. Levacher, and G. Dupas, Tetrahedron, 2003, 59, 8049; (d) J. B. Edson,
I. Keresztes, E. B. Lobkovsky, and G. W. Coates, ChemCatChem, 2009, 1, 122.
12. In our previous report (ref. 8), aminolithiation–carbolithiation tandem double cyclization reaction of
1d was carried out by using 1.5 equiv of bulky t-BuTrNLi in THF at room temperature. However, no
double cyclization product was observed in the reaction conditions described in this paper, i.e.,
catalytic amount of LDA and 3 in toluene at low temperature. This is because the carbolithiation
would require higher temperature.
13. A. Ariffin, A. J. Blake, M. R. Ebden, W. S. Li, N. S. Simpkins, and D. N. A. Fox, J. Chem. Soc.,
Perkin Trans. 1, 1999, 2439.
14. For an asymmetric synthesis of laudanosine: (a) M. Chrzanowska and M. D. Rozwadowska, Chem.
Rev., 2004, 104, 3341; (b) N. Blank and T. Opatz, J. Org. Chem., 2011, 76, 9777; (c) A. L. Zein, L.
N. Dawe, and P. E. Georghiou, J. Nat. Prod., 2010, 73, 1427; (d) D. Mujahidin and S. Doye, Eur. J.
Org. Chem., 2005, 2689; (e) E. Anakabe, L. Carrillo, D. Badía, J. L. Vicario, and M. Villegas,
Synthesis, 2004, 1093; (f) R. Pedrosa, C. Andrés, and J. M. Iglesias, J. Org. Chem., 2001, 66, 243; (g)
D. L. Comins, P. M. Thakker, M. F. Baevsky, and M. M. Badawi, Tetrahedron, 1997, 53, 16327; (h)
Z. Czarnocki, J. B. Mieczkowski, and M. Ziólkowski, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 1996, 7, 2711; (i) M.
Kitamura, Y. Hsiao, T. Ohta, M. Tsukamoto, T. Ohta, H. Takaya, and R. Noyori, J. Org. Chem.,
1994, 59, 297; (j) D. L. Comins and M. M. Badawi, Tetrahedron Lett., 1991, 32, 2995; (k) L.
Gottlieb and A. I. Meyers, J. Org. Chem., 1990, 55, 5659; (l) R. E. Gawley and G. A. Smith,

HETEROCYCLES, Vol. 86, No. 1, 2012
485
Tetrahedron Lett., 1988, 29, 301; (m) A. I. Meyers, D. A. Dickman, and M. Boes, Tetrahedron, 1987,
43, 5095; (n) R. Noyori, M. Ohta, Y. Hsiao, M. Kitamura, T. Ohta, and H. Takaya, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
1986, 108, 7117; (o) M. P. Cava and A. Afzali, J. Org. Chem., 1975, 40, 1553; (p) S. Yamada, M.
Konda, and T. Shioiri, Tetrahedron Lett., 1972, 22, 2215.
15. M. R. Ebden and N. S. Simpkins, Tetrahedron, 1998, 54, 12923.
16. J. Almena, F. Foubelo, and M. Yus, Tetrahedron, 1996, 52, 8545.
17. A. Poschalko, S. Welzig, M. Treu, S. Nerdinger, K. Mereiter, and U. Jordis, Tetrahedron, 2002, 58,
1513.
18. J. B. Bremner and L. V. Thuc, Aust. J. Chem., 1980, 33, 379.
19. (a) G. M. Coppola, J. Heterocycl. Chem., 1991, 28, 1769; (b) S. Kanokmedhakul, K. Kanokmedhakul,
and R. Lekphrom, J. Nat. Prod., 2007, 70, 1536.
20. Due to poor solubility in toluene, 28 was added portionwise to avoid its precipitation. Portionwise
addition of n-BuLi was also required for complete consumption of 28, indicating that reactive
anionic species were gradually protonated during the reaction. Chiral ligand 3c was used in slight
excess with respect to n-BuLi, because reduced amount of chiral ligand often resulted in decreased
enantioselectivity: H. Doi, T. Sakai, M. Iguchi, K. Yamada, and K. Tomioka, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2003, 125, 2886.