The Journal of Organic Chemistry
NOTE
hindrance resulting from ortho-substitution for enhanced differ-
entiation of enantiomers. The halo-substituted benzaldehydes
also provided the corresponding aldol adducts 18d,e,f,h in very
high to excellent chemical yields. The reaction of 2-chloroben-
zaldehyde (17e) was slower than that of 4-chlorobenzaldehyde
(17f); however, in both cases good to excellent enantioselec-
tivities were obtained for both syn- and anti-isomers. The
4-bromo- and 4-fluorobenzaldehydes also afforded correspond-
ing aldol adducts 18d, 18h with high enantioselectivity of anti-
products, but moderate enantioselectivity was obtained for syn-
products. In the case of electron-donating substituent, i.e. a
4-methoxy group, the reaction was completed in 72 h to provide
80% of aldol product 18i and syn- and anti-products were
obtained with 20% and 98% enantioselectivity, respectively.
The reaction between acetone and 4-nitrobenzaldehyde was
also carried out in the presence of catalyst 1a. However, the
asymmetric induction was not impressive. The reaction was
performed at 0 and -20 °C to produce the aldol product in
35% ee (18 h, 93%) and 66% ee (48 h, 85%), respectively.
In conclusion, for the first time, a bifunctional sugar-based
primary amine was employed independently as an efficient and
potential organocatalyst for the asymmetric transformation. We
observed that the sugar catalyst 1a bearing a free hydroxyl group
vicinal to primary amine functionality was the optimal catalyst for
our study and it provides the best results possibly through the
hydrogen bonding between the proton on the hydroxyl moiety
and the carbonyl group of the aldehyde. This situation could be
analogous to the functional group array of proline, especially in
light of the reduced pKa of carbohydrate hydroxyls relative to
simple secondary alcohols. We have also studied the anomeric
effect of sugar-based molecules 2a and 2b, 4a, and 4b on the rate
of reaction as well as on the optical induction of the aldol adduct
and found that R-anomers catalyze the reaction faster than the β-
anomers. As these derivatives have been shown to be promising
organocatalysts for direct asymmetric aldol reactions it provides
us an opportunity to explore their catalytic activity for other
asymmetric transformations in due course.
’ AUTHOR INFORMATION
Corresponding Author
*E-mail: rkpedfcy@iitr.ernet.in.
’ ACKNOWLEDGMENT
We are grateful to DST, New Delhi for financial support
(research grant No. SR/S1/OC-15/2005). J.A. thanks UGC for
the award of a research fellowship.
’ REFERENCES
(1) Kunz, H.; Ruck, K. Angew. Chem., Intl. Ed. Engl. 1993,
32, 336–358.
(2) (a) Yu, T.; Wang, Z.-X.; Shi, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996,
118, 9806–9807. (b) Hurzeler, M.; Bernet, B.; Vasella, A. Helv. Chim.
Acta 1992, 75, 557–558. (c) Park, H.; Ranjanbabu, T. V. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2002, 124, 734–735.
(3) (a) Emmerson, D. P. G.; Hems, W. P.; Davis, B. G. Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry 2005, 16, 213–221. (b) Ribeiro, C. M. R.; Santos, E. de S.;
Jardim, A. H. de O.; Maia, M. P.; Silva, F. C. da; Moreira, A. P. D.;
Ferreira, V. F. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2002, 13, 1703–1706. (c) Bauer,
T.; Tarasiuk, J.; Paꢀsniczek, K. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2002, 13, 77–82.
(4) Selke, R.; Ohff, M.; Riepe, A. Tetrahedron 1996,
52, 15079–15102.
(5) Masumoto, S.; Usuda, H.; Suzuki, M.; Kanai, M.; Shibasaki, M.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 5634–5635.
(6) (a) Cho, B. T.; Chun, Y. S.; Yang, W. K. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry
2000, 11, 2149–2157. (b) Emmerson, D. P. G.; Villard, R.; Mugnaini, C.;
Batsanov, A.; Howard, J. A. K.; Hems, W. P.; Tooze, R. P.; Davis, B. G.
Org. Biomol. Chem. 2003, 1, 3826–3838.
(7) Agarwal, J.; Peddinti, R. K. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2010,
21, 1906–1909.
(8) Becker, C.; Hoben, C.; Kunz, H. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2007,
349, 417–424.
(9) (a) Liu, K; Cui, H.-F.; Nie, J.; Dong, K.-Y.; Li, X.-J.; Ma, J.-A. Org.
Lett. 2007, 9, 923–925. (b) Wang, C. G.; Zhou, Z. H.; Tang, C. C. Org.
Lett. 2008, 10, 1707–1710. (c) Gao, P.; Wang, C. G.; Wu, Y.; Zhou,
Z. H.; Tang, C. C. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 4563–4566. (d) Lu, A.; Gao,
P.; Wu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, Z.; Tang, C. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2009,
7, 3141–3147. (e) Wang, Y.; Yang, H.; Yu, J.; Miao, Z.; Chen, R. Adv.
Synth. Catal. 2009, 351, 3057–3062.
’ EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
General Procedure for the Aldol Reaction. To the solution of
organocatalyst 1a (0.04 mM, 20 mol %) in cyclohexanone (0.3 mL) was
added aryl aldehyde (0.2 mM) and the resulting reaction mixture was
stirred for a certain time (as mentioned in Table 3) at -20 °C. The
progress of the reaction was monitored by TLC. After completion of the
reaction, crude product was submitted to 1H NMR (500 MHz)
spectroscopy to obtain a diastereomeric ratio of syn- and anti-products.
Then the reaction mixture was subjected to silica gel chromatography to
afford the corresponding products 18a-k in pure form. The HPLC
analysis of the aldol products was performed on a chiral stationary phase
with hexane-isopropanol as the eluting solvent.
(10) Singh, N.; Pandey, J.; Tripathy, R. P. Catal. Commun. 2008,
9, 743–746.
(11) For reviews on primary amine-catalyzed reactions, see: (a)
Peng, F.; Shao, Z. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 2008, 285, 1–13. (b) Xu, L.-W.;
Luo, J.; Lu, Y. Chem. Commun. 2009, 1807–1821.
(12) Bornaghi, L. F.; Poulsen, S.-A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005,
46, 3485–3488.
(13) Henry, C.; Joly, J.-P.; Chapleur, Y. J. Carbohydr. Chem. 1999,
18, 689–695.
(14) Aly, M. R. E.; Schmidt, R. R. Eur. J. Org. Chem.
2005, 4382–4392.
’ ASSOCIATED CONTENT
’ NOTE ADDED AFTER ASAP PUBLICATION
S
This paper was published to the Web on March 21, 2011,
with errors in the abstract graphic and scheme 1. These errors
were fixed when the paper was published to the Web on
March 29, 2011.
Supporting Information. Experimental procedures,
b
characterization data of new compounds, HPLC data table and
chromatograms for aldol products, and copies of 1H (500 MHz)
and 13C (125 MHz) NMR spectra of all compounds; and 500
MHz 1H-1H COSY and 125 MHz HETCOR spectra of 4a and
4b. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at
3505
dx.doi.org/10.1021/jo1023156 |J. Org. Chem. 2011, 76, 3502–3505