Wolfe and co-workers reported the Pd(0)-catalyzed ami-
noarylation of amino-tethered alkenes with aryl bromides.7
Michael and co-workers reported a novel example in which
a Pd(II)-catalyzed aminoarylation of alkenes was utilized
via CÀH activation of arenes.8 In recent years, our research
group has developed a series of Pd(II)-catalyzed intramole-
cular aminoalkylation of alkenes by applying a Heck-type
termination of the aminopalladation process with an in-
tramolecularly tethered alkene moiety.9 As part of our
continuous interest in developing new tandem cyclization
reactions under Pd(II)-catalyzed oxidative conditions, here-
in we report a highly efficient Pd(II)-catalyzed intramole-
cular 1,2-aminoalkylation of N-4,6-dienyl β-keto amides for
the synthesis of pyrrolizidines.
CÀC bond formations) have not been explored. Based on
this 1,3-diene-involving catalytic mode, we hypothesized
that, under Pd(II) catalytic conditions, in the presence of a
tethered diene, a β-keto amide would act as a 2-fold
nucleophile responsible for both CÀN and CÀC bond
formation to undergo an overall intramolecular 1,2-ami-
noalkylation via a sequence of aminopalladation/Pd(II)
π-allyl species formation/2nd nucleophilic addition (Figure 1).
Table 1. Optimization of Reaction Conditionsa
yieldb
entry
cat.
additive
solvent
(%)
1
2
3
4
5c
6
7
8
9
Pd(OAc)2
À
DMSO
DMSO
24
Pd(OAc)2 Cu(OTf)2
Pd(OAc)2 Cu(OTf)2
Pd(OAc)2 Cu(OTf)2
Pd(OAc)2 Cu(OTf)2
Pd(TFA)2 Cu(OTf)2
35
47
DMSO/PhMe (1/4)
Figure 1. Proposed intramolecular 1,2-aminoalkylation.
DMSO/PhMe (5% v/v) 56
PhMe <5
DMSO/PhMe (5% v/v) 78(76)d
It has been reported that, under Pd(II) catalytic condi-
tions, 1,3-dienes could undergo different types of oxidative
nucleophilic difunctionalization.10 In the presence of the
adjacent alkene moiety, the Pd(II)-alkyl intermediate gen-
erated by the initial nucleopalladation could be rapidly
converted into a more electrophilic π-allyl species, there-
fore allowing a second nucleophilic attack to establish an
Pd(TFA)2 Cu(OAc)2 DMSO/PhMe (5% v/v) <5
Pd(TFA)2
À
DMSO/PhMe (5% v/v) 34
DMSO/PhMe (5% v/v) <5
À
Cu(OTf)2
a All reactions were carried out on a 0.3 mmol scale. b Yield deter-
mined by 1H NMR using nitrobenzene as internal standard. c With
20 mol % (0.06 mmol) DMSO. d Isolated yield shown in the parentheses.
overall tandem sequence.2f,10 Following Backvall’s pioneer-
€
The Pd(II) catalyst in DMSO has been proven as an
efficient catalyst system for both oxidative amination
reactions12 and the alkylation of Pd(II) π-allyl species;13
therefore it would be a good catalytic system for the initial
investigation of our hypothesized intramolecular 1,2-ami-
noalkylation. As the starting point, (E)-N-(2,2-diphenyl-
hepta-4,6-dienyl)-3-oxobutanamide 1a was synthesized
and subjected to 10 mol % of Pd(OAc)2 in DMSO under
1 atm of O2. To our delight, the desired product 2a was
obtained as a single diastereomer in 24% yield (Table 1,
entry 1). Inspired by this result, further optimizations were
conducted toimprovethe efficiencyof this transformation.
To enhance the nucleophilic ability of the acidic methylene
moiety, different Lewis acids were tested,14 however, only
Cu(OTf)2 could slightly enhance the product yield
(Table 1, entry 2). Changing the solvent from DMSO to
a 1:4 mixture of DMSO in toluene enhanced the yield to
47% (Table 1, entry 3); an even higher yield was achieved
when5% v/v DMSOin toluene wasused (Table1, entry 4).
ing work on a series of Pd(II)-catalyzed 1,4-difunctionaliza-
tion of 1,3-dienes,11 intramolecular 1,4-diamination,10a 1,2-
diamination,10b and 1,2-dialkylation of 1,3-dienes10c,d have
been recently developed. However, intramolecular transfor-
mations involving different bond formations (i.e., CÀN and
(7) For a review and selected examples, see: (a) Schultz, D. M.; Wolfe,
J. P. Synthesis-Stuttgart 2012, 44, 351. (b) Ney, J. E.; Wolfe, J. P. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 3605. (c) Ney, J. E.; Wolfe, J. P. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2005, 127, 8644. (d) Mai, D. N.; Wolfe, J. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010,
132, 12157.
(8) Rosewall, C. F.; Sibbald, P. A.; Liskin, D. V.; Michael, F. E.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 9488.
(9) (a) Yip, K.-T.; Yang, M.; Law, K.-L.; Zhu, N.-Y.; Yang, D.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 3130. (b) He, W.; Yip, K.-T.; Zhu, N.-Y.;
Yang, D. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 5626. (c) Yip, K. T.; Zhu, N. Y.; Yang, D.
Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 1911. (d) Yip, K.-T.; Yang, D. Org. Lett. 2011, 13,
2134. (e) Yip, K.-T.; Yang, D. Chem.ÀAsian. J. 2011, 6, 2166.
€
(10) (a) Andersson, P. G.; Backvall, J. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992,
114, 8696. (b) Bar, G. L. J.; Lloyd-Jones, G. C.; Booker-Milburn, K. I.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 7308. (c) Houlden, C. E.; Bailey, C. D.;
ꢀ
Ford, J. G.; Gagne, M. R.; Lloyd-Jones, G. C.; Booker-Milburn, K. I.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 10066. (d) Coscia, R. W.; Lambert, T. H.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 2496. (e) Widenhoefer, R. A. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 6950. (f) Liao, L.; Jana, R.; Urkalan, K. B.;
Sigman, M. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 5784. (g) McCammant,
M. S.; Liao, L.; Sigman, M. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 4167.
(12) (a) van Benthem, R. A. T. M.; Hiemstra, H.; Longarela, G. R.;
€
Speckamp, W. N. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 9281. (b) Ronn, M.;
€
Backvall, J.-E.; Andersson, P. G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 7749. (c)
€
(11) For selected examples, see: (a) Backvall, J. E.; Bystroem, S. E.;
€
Larock, R. C.; Hightower, T. R.; Hasvold, L. A.; Peterson, K. P. J. Org.
Chem. 1996, 61, 3584. (d) Liu, G. S.; Stahl, S. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007,
129, 6328.
(13) Young, A. J.; White, M. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 14090.
(14) For details, see Supporting Information.
Nordberg, R. E. J. Org. Chem. 1984, 49, 4619. (b) Backvall, J. E.;
Nystroem, J. E.; Nordberg, R. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 3676. (c)
€
Backvall, J. E.; Andersson, P. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 3683. (d)
€
Backvall, J. E.; Andersson, P. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 6374. (e)
€
Castano, A. M.; Backvall, J.-E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 560.
B
Org. Lett., Vol. XX, No. XX, XXXX