J. Achkar et al. / Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 19 (2008) 1049–1051
1051
1
3. (a) Kim, B. M.; Sharpless, K. B. Tetrahedron Lett. 1990, 31,
3003–3006; (b) Pini, D.; Petri, A.; Salvadori, P. Tetrahedron
1994, 50, 11321–11328; (c) Salvadori, P.; Pini, D.; Petri, A. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 6929–6930; (d) Song, C. E.; Yang,
J. W.; Ha, H. J.; Lee, S. G. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1996, 7,
645–648; (e) Nandanan, E.; Sudalai, A.; Ravindranathan, T.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 2577–2580; (f) Lohray, B. B.;
Nandanan, E.; Bhushan, V. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 6559–
6562; (g) Fan, Q. H.; Li, Y. M.; Chan, A. S. C. Chem. Rev.
2002, 102, 3385–3466; (h) Bolm, C.; Gerlach, A. Eur. J. Org.
Chem. 1998, 21–27; (i) Han, H.; Janda, K. D. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1997, 38, 1527–1530; (j) Kuang, Y. Q.; Zhang, S. Y.;
Wei, L. L. Synth. Commun. 2003, 33, 3545–3550.
provide 7 as a white solid in 84% yield. H NMR (300 MHz,
CDCl3) 8.68–8.58 (m, 2H), 8.36–8.25 (m, 2H), 8.02–7.88 (m,
4H), 7.58 (br s, 2H), 7.42 (m, 2H), 7.39–7.31 (m, 2H), 7.12–
6.98 (m, 2H), 3.94 (s, 3H), 3.91 (s, 3H), 3.67 (s, 3H), 3.54–2.93
(m, 6H), 2.79–1.20 (m, 26H), 0.82 (t, J = 7.9 Hz, 3H). PDMS:
calcd [M] = 896.5; obsd [M+1] = 897.7.
9. Preparation of 8 from 6: TentaGel-S-NH2 (300 lmol/g, 0.47 g,
142 lmol), O-benzotriazol-1-yl-N,N,N0,N0-tetramethyluroni-
um hexafluorophosphate (HBTU, 0.16 g, 425 lmol), 1-
hydroxybenzotriazole
hydrate
(HOBtꢂH2O,
0.02 g,
100 lmol), diisopropylethylamine (0.11 g, 850 lmol) and 6
(0.25 g, 283 lmol, 0.1 M final concentration) were shaken at
20 °C for 30 h in anhydrous CH2Cl2 and N,N-dimethylform-
amide (1/1 v/v, 3 mL). The progress of the reaction was
followed using the Kaiser test.6 The resin beads were then
filtered and washed sequentially with DMF, CH2Cl2, DMF,
CH2Cl2 and diethylether (3 ꢁ 15 mL each). After drying the
beads under vacuum, the unreacted free amines (inaccessible
sites, <1%) were capped as follows: 3 min room temperature
treatment with 0.75 vol of 6.5% (w/v) 4-dimethylaminopyr-
idine in THF and 0.25 vol of 40% (v/v) acetic anhydride in
2,6-lutidine, followed by extensive washes of the resin with
THF, DMF, CH2Cl2 and MeOH. Preparation of 8 from 7:
4. Amberg, W.; Bennani, Y. L.; Chadha, R. K.; Crispino, G. A.;
Davis, W. D.; Hartung, J.; Jeong, K. S.; Ogino, Y.; Shibata,
T.; Sharpless, K. B. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 844–849.
5. Inagaki, M.; Hiratake, J.; Yamamoto, Y.; Oda, J. Bull. Chem.
Soc. Jpn. 1987, 60, 4121–4126.
6. Sarin, V. K.; Kent, S. B. H.; Tam, J. P.; Merrifield, R. B.
Anal. Biochem. 1981, 117, 147–157.
7. Spectral data of compounds 4,4 53i and 63i are in agreement
with the literature.
8. Preparation of 7 from 5: Compound 5 (0.23 g, 0.29 mmol),
methyl-3-mercaptopropionate (0.35 g, 2.93 mmol) and 2,20-
azobisisobutyronitrile (AIBN, 0.024 g, 0.15 mmol) were dried
under high vacuum and then refluxed in benzene (30 mL) for
24 h. Additional AIBN (0.021 g, 0.13 mmol) was then added
and refluxing was maintained for 12 more hours. Note that the
starting material and product have the same Rf by TLC (10%
MeOH/CH2Cl2), so the reaction must be pushed to comple-
tion. The solvent and excess methyl-3-mercaptopropionate
were removed under high vacuum and the solid was purified
by flash chromatography (SiO2, 0–5% MeOH/CH2Cl2) to
TentaGel-S-NH2 (300 lmol/g, 11 mg, 3.3 lmol) and
7
(13 mg, 14.5 lmol) were shaken at 100 °C for 48 h in
anhydrous DMF (enough to cover the resin with solvent).
The progress of the reaction was monitored using the Kaiser
test.6 The resin beads were then filtered and washed sequen-
tially with DMF, CH2Cl2, DMF, CH2Cl2 and diethylether
(3 ꢁ 3 mL each). After drying the beads under vacuum, the
unreacted free amines were capped as described previously.
10. Ogino, Y.; Chen, H.; Kwong, H. L.; Sharpless, K. B.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32, 3965–3968.