J. Malmquist et al.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of [3’-3H]-4-(2’-chloro-6’-hydroxyphenyl)-2-thioxo-3,4-dihydro-1H-indeno[1,2-d]pyrimidin-5(2H)-one (1).
0.48 mmol) in a 72% yield as an oil which solidified upon standing.
1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) d ppm 2.07 (s, 6 H), 2.33 (s, 3 H), 7.24 (d,
J = 8.83 Hz, 1 H), 7.96 (d, J = 8.83 Hz, 1 H), 8.00 (s, 1 H). 13C NMR
(126MHz, DMSO-d6) d ppm 20.3, 20.6, 86.1, 120.4, 125.2, 127.4, 133.3,
135.5, 149.4, 168.4, 169.0. GCMS (CI) m/z 319 (80%), 321 (100%), 323
(20%) ([M-OAc]ꢀ).
[5] [5-3H]-(2-acetoxy-6-chlorophenyl)methylene diacetate (4) (2-acetoxy-5-
bromo-6-chlorophenyl)methylene diacetate, 3, (12 mg, 32 mmol) was
mixed with palladium (10% on carbon) (1.4mg) in methanol (1mL).
The mixture was degassed and was connected to tritium (1084mbar)
at ambient temperature. After 1½ hour, the mixture was disconnected
from the tritium manifold, was filtered, and was evaporated with
methanol (1 mL) thrice. Compound 4 (7mg, 23 mmol) was obtained
in 72% yield and was used as is in the next step. GCMS (CI) m/z 241
(30%), 243 (100%), 245 (25%) ([M-OAc]ꢀ)
[6] [3-3H]-2-chloro-6-hydroxybenzaldehyde (5). A solution of [5-2H]-(2-
acetoxy-6-chlorophenyl)methylene diacetate, 4, (7 mg, 0.02 mmol)
and sodium hydroxide (10% aq., 0.074 mL, 0.19 mmol) in methanol
(1 mL) was heated at 65ꢁC under a nitrogen atmosphere. After 3 h,
the reaction was concentrated to dryness. Dichloromethane (2 mL)
was added and the mixture was acidified with hydrochloric acid
(2M, 0.116 mL, 0.23 mmol). Sodium sulfate was added. The dried
organic phase was filtered and concentrated to give 5 (2 mg,
0.01 mmol) in a 50% yield. The product was used as is in the next
step. GCMS (CI) m/z 157 (25%), 159 (100%), 161 (25%) (Mꢀ).
[7] C. Ramalingan, Y.-W. Kwak, Tetrahedron, 2008, 64, 5023–5031.
[8] [30-3H]-4-(20-chloro-60-hydroxyphenyl)-2-thioxo-3,4-dihydro-1H-indeno
[1,2-d]pyrimidin-5(2H)-one (1). To a stirred mixture of [3-3H]-2-chloro-6-
hydroxybenzaldehyde, 5, (2mg, 0.01 mmol), 1H-indene-1,3(2H)-dione,
6, (2 mg, 0.01 mmol) and thiourea (2 mg, 0.03 mmol) in N,N-dimethylfor-
mamide (0.5 mL) and acetonitrile (1 mL) under a nitrogen atmosphere
was added silicon(IV) chloride (0.1 mL, 1 mmol). After stirring overnight
at ambient temperature, the mixture was concentrated. The residue
was dissolved in N,N-dimethylformamide (0.4 mL) and was filtered. Pur-
ification by HPLC on a Kromasil™ C8 column (5 m, 10ꢂ 250 mm) using
53% acetonitrile in 50 mM ammonium acetate in MilliQ water at 2 mL/
min gave compound 1 (630 MBq, 0.90 TBq/mmol) in a 7% yield and a
radiochemical purity of 99%. The product was stored in ethanol (abs.,
6.64 mL) at 95MBq/mL. 1H NMR (600MHz, 13.5 MBq, i.e., 75 mM in
200 mL methanol-d4 in a 3 mm NMR-tube) d ppm 6.19 (s, 1 H) 6.73 (d,
J= 7 Hz, 1 H) 7.07 (t, J= 8 Hz, 1 H) 7.29–7.36 (m, 2 H) 7.38 (t, J=7 Hz, 1 H)
Figure 1. NMR spectra showing (A) 1H spectrum of unlabeled reference to 1; (B) 1
H
spectrum of 13.5 MBq 1; (C) 3H spectrum of 13.5 MBq 1; and (D) 3H spectrum with 1H
decoupling of 13.5 MBq 1. A total of 13.5 MBq 1 corresponds to 75 mM in 200 mL deut-
erated methanol in a 3 mm NMR tube, and this low amount of material is quite suffi-
cient to obtain spectra with sufficient signal-to-noise ratios. The 3 mm NMR tube was
flame sealed and placed in a standard 5 mm NMR tube to enable the use of a standard
spinner and add extra protection from breaking the 3 mm NMR tube.
References
[1] D. Jaquemar, T. Schenker, B. Trueb, J. Biol. Chem. 1999, 274,
7325–7333.
[2] M. Bandell, G. M. Story, S. W. Hwang, V. Viswanath, S. R. Eid, M. J. Petrus,
T. J. Earley, A. Patapoutian, Neuron, 2004, 41, 849–857.
[3] a) C. R. McNamara, J. Mandel-Brehm, D. M. Bautista, J. Siemens, K. L.
Deranian, M. Zhao, N. J. Hayward, J. A. Chong, D. Julius, M. M. Moran,
C. M. Fanger, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2007, 104, 13525–13530. b) M.
Moran, C. Fanger, J. A. Chong, C. McNamara, X. Zhen, J. Mandel-Brehm,
PCT Int. Appl. WO 2007073505 A2, 2007. c) R. S. Perner, S. Didomenico, J.
Chen, A. Vasudevan, US Pat. Appl. US 20090176883 A1, 2009. d)
S. McGaraughty, K. L. Chu, R. J. Perner, S. DiDomenico, M. E. Kort,
P. R. Kym Mol. Pain, 2010, 6, 14. e) M. Muthuppalniappan, A. Thomas, S.
Kumar, S. Margal, N. Khairatkar-Joshi, I. Mukhopadhyay, S. Gullapalli, US
Pat. Appl. US 20090325987 A1, 2009. f) B. Kremeyer, F. Lopera, J. J. Fox,
A. Momin, F. Rugiero, S. Marsh, C. G. Woods, N. G. Jones, K. J. Paterson,
F. R. Fricker, A. Villegas, N. Acosta, N. G. Pineda-Trujillo, J. D. Ramírez, J.
Zea, M. W. Burley, G. Bedoya, D. L. H. Bennett, J. N. Wood, A. Ruiz-
Linarez Neuron. 2010, 66, 671–680.
3
7.53 (d, J= 7 Hz, 1 H). H NMR (640 MHz, 13.5 MBq, i.e., 75 mM in 200mL
in a 3 mm NMR-tube) d ppm 6.91 (d, J=8 Hz, 1 T). LCMS (ES+) m/z 343.1
(24%), 345 (100%), 346 (17%), 347 (37.7%) ([M + H]+).
[9] This work was part of the presentation Imaging agents for CX3CR1,
MPO and TRPA1 with a pinch of sulfur presented at the International
Symposium on the Synthesis and Application of Isotopes and Isoto-
pically Labelled Compounds 2012 in Heidelberg, Germany, which
also included: a) J. Malmquist, P. Ström, J. Lab. Comp. Radiopharm.,
2012, 55, 387–392. b) J. Malmquist, A. Bernlind, M. Johansson, A.
Juréus, M. Nilsson, J. Lab. Comp. Radiopharm., 2012, 55, 393–399.
[4] 2-acetoxy-5-bromo-6-chlorophenyl)methylene diacetate (3). 5-bromo- 6-
chloro-2-hydroxybenzaldehyde, 2, (157mg, 0.67 mmol) was mixed
with acetic anhydride (1.5mL, 16mmol) and sulfuric acid (5mL, [10] A lock signal could not be obtained with 29 mM (5 MBq) in 25 mL
0.09mmol) and the mixture was stirred at ambient temperature for
2 min. The mixture was heated to reflux for 2 min, then cooled in an
ice/water bath and was diluted with water (5mL). A precipitate was
formed which was dissolved in chloroform (5mL). The organic phase
was dried over sodium sulfate and was filtered and the resulting solu-
tion was concentrated. The residue was chromatographed on silica gel
(25 g) using ethyl acetate as eluent to obtain compound 3 (181 mg,
deuterated methanol in a 1 mm NMR tube in the NMR at the time
the experiment was performed. Subsequently, a hardware malfunc-
tion was discovered in the equipment; therefore, the 5 MBq might
have succeeded otherwise.
[11] For experimental details see: J. Malmquist, A. Bernlind, J. Sandell, P.
Ström, M. Waldman, J. Lab. Comp. Radiopharm. 2012, 55, 80–83.
Tritium-gas was handled in a tritium manifold from RC Tritec AG, Teufen.
J. Label Compd. Radiopharm 2013, 56 536–537
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.