Full Paper
Table 1. Optimization of CÀH bond allenylation of amide1a.[a]
Table 2. Influence of the amide 1 substitution pattern.[a]
Entry [Ru]
Additive Solvent
Yield [%]
Entry
1
Yield of 3 [%]
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
RuCl3·(H2O)n
[Cp*RuCl2]n
[RuCl2(benzene)]2
[RuBr2(p-cymene)]2
[RuCl2(p-cymene)]2
[RuCl2(p-cymene)]2
[Ru(OAc)2(p-cymene)]
[Ru(OAc)2(p-cymene)]
[Ru(OAc)2(p-cymene)]
[RuCl(OAc)(p-cymene)]
NaOAc
NaOAc
NaOAc
NaOAc
NaOAc
NaOAc
–
NaOAc
KCl
–
MeOH
MeOH
MeOH
MeOH
MeOH
MeOH
MeOH
MeOH
MeOH
MeOH
MeOH
MeOH
MeOH/H2O (20:1) 75
DCE
PhMe
MeOH
MeOH
–
26
58
52
75
77[b]
24
41
46
–
1
2
3
4
5
6
R1 =Me (1a)
R1 =Et (1b)
R1 =iPr (1c)
R1 =tBu (1d)
R1 =Bn (1 f)
R1 =Ph (1e)
3aa: 75
3aa: 71
3aa: 8[b]
–
3aa: 18[b]
3aa: 5[b]
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
[RuCl(OAc)(p-cymene)] NaOAc
65
3[c]
[RuCl2(p-cymene)]2
[RuCl2(p-cymene)]2
[RuCl2(p-cymene)]2
[RuCl2(p-cymene)]2
[RuCl2(p-cymene)]2
–
–
NaOAc
NaOAc
NaOAc
NaOAc
NaOAc
34
5[c]
7
8
–
56[d]
–
[a] Reaction conditions: 1a (0.50 mmol), 2a (0.53 mmol), [Ru] (10 mol%),
additive (30 mol%), solvent (3.0 mL), 228C, 18 h, under N2, yields of isolat-
ed products. [b] With 0.75 mmol of allene 2a. [c] Conversion determined
by 1H NMR spectroscopy with CH2Br2 as the internal standard. [d] At 08C.
–
[a] Reaction conditions:
1
(0.50 mmol), 2a (0.53 mmol), [RuCl2(p-
cymene)]2 (5.0 mol%), NaOAc (30 mol%), MeOH (3.0 mL), 228C, 18 h,
under N2, yields of isolated products. [b] Conversion determined by
1H NMR spectroscopy with CH2Br2 as the internal standard.
(Table 1 and Tables SI1 and SI2, Supporting Information).[18]
Among a set of representative ruthenium complexes, [RuCl2(p-
cymene)]2 catalyzed the reaction to deliver the desired product
3aa in the highest yield (Table 1, entries 1–5). The well-defined
ruthenium(II) biscarboxylate complex [Ru(OAc)2(p-cymene)][19]
delivered a moderate yield of product 3aa, even when NaOAc
or KCl[20] were used as additives (entries 7–9). [RuCl(OAc)(p-
cymene)][21] did not furnish the desired product 3aa, but the
catalytic activity could be restored through the addition of
NaOAc (entries 10 and 11). After testing a variety of cocatalytic
additives and solvents, we found that acetates and protic sol-
vents proved to be superior, and optimal results were obtained
with NaOAc and MeOH (entries 12–15). The reaction proceed-
ed smoothly under exceedingly mild reaction conditions of
228C;[22] in fact, the catalyst was also operative at 08C
(entry 16). In the absence of a ruthenium complex, the sub-
strates 1a and 2a did not react (entry 17).
Subsequently, we examined the influence of the substituents
on the N-alkoxyl moiety (Table 2). N-Methoxy- and N-ethoxy-
substituted amides 1a and 1b reacted with comparable con-
version (Table 2, entries 1 and 2). Amides with a more hindered
benzyl or iso-propyl group reacted sluggishly (entries 3 and 5),
and substrates with phenyl or tert-butyl groups did not partici-
pate in the CÀH activation reaction (entries 4 and 6), probably
due to unfavourable steric interactions. Similarly, no conversion
was observed with the tertiary Weinreb benzamide (1g,
entry 7), which suggests that the coordination by an anionic
amide is essential. The amides that bear other potential leaving
groups, such as acetyl (entry 8), pivaloyl, tert-butyloxycarbonyl,
or benzoyl substituents, were found to be ineffective.
Substrate scope
To evaluate the versatility of the ruthenium(II)-catalyzed pro-
cess, the optimized reaction conditions were applied to vari-
ously substituted N-methoxybenzamides 1i–t (Scheme 2). Ac-
cordingly, high yields of the desired allenylated products 3ia–
na were obtained with electron-rich substituents, whereas
electron-deficient aromatic compounds 1 proved to be more
challenging. Amides with meta-methyl, meta-trifluoromethyl,
or meta-chloro substituents (1o–q) furnished a single isomer
through the functionalization at the less sterically encumbered
CÀH bond. The disubstituted amide 1r and the naphthoic
amide 1s also underwent the CÀH functionalization process
with excellent site-selectivity. Notably, the hindered di-meta-
substituted aromatic compound 1t delivered the desired prod-
uct 3ta with high catalytic efficacy.
Subsequently, differently decorated allenes 2b–i were sub-
jected to the optimized reaction conditions (Scheme 3). Under
the mild reaction conditions, a variety of silylated gem-disubsti-
tuted allenes reacted to give products 3ab–ai, despite the
bulk of the silyl groups. We observed that the reactivity of the
allenes was strongly influenced by the substituents on the
Chem. Eur. J. 2015, 21, 16246 – 16251
16247
ꢀ 2015 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim