NMR study of the enol forms of benzoylacetones 997
basis set was used. The nuclear shieldings were calcu-
lated using the gauge including atomic orbitals (GIAO)
approach.31,32
CONCLUSIONS
The type of potential for the enolic form of ˇ-diketones has
been reinvestigated and a two-potential well, tautomeric
system is the favoured one down to 181 K for BAs.
Mesomerically, electron-donating substituents like methoxy
and fluoro in para-position favours the B-tautomer (Scheme
2). And as a whole, the influence of substituents on
the position of the equilibrium is identical to that for
diaryltriazenes. On the basis of both deuterium isotope
effects on 13C chemical shifts, the long-range 13C–O1H
coupling constants–O1H chemical shifts correlations and
primary deuterium isotope effects on chemical shifts the
same pattern is also found for DBM. This is contrary to
the recent study by X ray in which it was suggested
that DBM shows a one-potential well.16 Lowering the
temperature increases the hydrogen bond strength as judged
both from isotope effects on chemical shifts and OH
chemical shifts. However, these changes are moderate.
In the solid at 20 K, an almost symmetrical structure
of BA was found.13 We suggest a reduction in twist
angle to be the driving force leading to more steric
Acknowledgements
The present study was supported by INTAS grant 96-1021, which
is gratefully acknowledged. Professor Hans Fritz is thanked
for providing the isotope effect data of dibenzoylmethanes
(Table 6).
REFERENCES
1. Chan SI, Lin L, Clutter D, Dea P. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
1970; 65: 816.
2. Bratan S, Strohbusch F. Chem. Ber. 1972; 105: 2284.
3. Shapet’ko NN, Bogachev YuS, Khatipov SA. Zh. Fiz. Khim. 1988;
62: 2632.
4. Baugham SL, Smith Z, Wilson WB, Duerst RW. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1984; 106: 2260.
5. Emsley J. Structure and Bonding, vol. 57. Springer-Verlag: Berlin,
1984; 147.
6. Emsley J, Freeman NJ, Bates PA, Hursthouse MB. J. Chem. Soc.,
Perkin Trans. 1 1988; 297.
7. Bolvig S, Hansen PE. Magn. Reson. Chem. 1996; 34: 467.
8. Borisov EV, Khlebnikova TS. Dokl. Acad. Nauk, BSSR 1987; 31:
359.
9. Gilli G, Belluci F, Ferretti V, Bertolasi V. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989;
111: 1023.
10. Bertolasi V, Gilli P, Ferretti V, Gilli G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991; 113:
4917.
compression25,26 and a shorter O O distance that ultimately
leads to a longer O–H distance and to a more symmetrical
structure.
Ð Ð Ð
11. Gilli G, Bertolasi V. In The Chemistry of Enols, Rappoport Z (ed).
John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1990; 713.
EXPERIMENTAL
12. Borisov EV, Zhang W, Bolvig S, Hansen PE. Magn. Reson. Chem.
1998; 36: S104.
13. Madsen GKH, Iversen BB, Larsen FK, Kapon M, Reisner GM,
Herbstein FH. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998; 120: 10 040.
14. Schiott B, Madsen GKH, Bruice TC. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998; 120:
12 117.
Compounds
The compounds were prepared according to Ref. 27. For
m-fluorobenzoylacetone: (mp 42–44 C); elemental analysis:
calculated: C-66.66%; H-5.00%; found: C-66.59%; I-4.97%.
°
15. Borisov EV. Russ. Chem. Bull. 2000; 49: 758.
16. Perrin CL, Nielson JB, Kim Y-J. Ber. Bunsen-Ges. Phys. Chem. 1998;
102: 403.
17. Perrin CL, Kim Y-J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998; 120: 12 641.
18. Perrin CL, Nielson JB. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 1997; 48: 511.
19. Gilli P, Bertolasi V, Pretto L, Ferretti V, Gilli G. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2004; 126: 3845.
20. Borisov EV, Peregudov AS, Postovoi SA, Fedin EI, Kravtsov DN.
Bull. Acad. Sci. USSR, Div. Chem. Sci. 1986; 449.
21. Bolvig S, Hansen PE. Curr. Org. Chem. 2000; 4: 19.
22. Hansen PE, Bolvig S. Magn. Reson. Chem. 1997; 35: 520.
23. Hansen PE. Magn. Reson. Chem. 1986; 24: 903.
24. Bolvig S, Hansen PE, Morimoto H, Wemmer D, Williams P.
Magn. Reson. Chem. 2000; 38: 525.
NMR
NMR spectra were recorded at 50.32 MHz on a Bruker
AC-P 200 spectrometer at temperatures between 268 and
181 K. Compounds were dissolved in CD2Cl2, THF-d8 in 1 M
concentration whenever possible.
The SELJRES experiments28 were performed using the
Bruker library program with the following acquisition
parameters spectral width 10.02 Hz ꢀF1ꢁ ð 12 195.12 Hz ꢀF2ꢁ,
NS D 64, NE D 32, data matrix 64 W ð 4K, relaxation
delay 15 s, selection pulse width 8.45 µs, CPD decoupling.
Processing parameters were data matrix 1 K ð 4 K, digital
resolution 0.01 Hz/point, filters were GM(ꢀ0.025; 0.01) F1
and sine (shifted ꢃ/2) F2.
The dispersion for the Me signal in acetylacetone at 207 K
(15%v/v) was 0.02 Hz (95%)(five independent experiments).
This data can be used as an estimation of the upper level of
accuracy of the experimental data. The temperatures were
calibrated using an MeOH sample (Tesla). The temperature
standard deviation was estimated as 0.5 K (all range of
temperatures).
25. Abildgaard J, Bolvig S, Hansen PE. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998; 120:
9063.
26. Filarowski A, Koll A, Glowiak T. Monatsch. Chem. 1999; 130:
1097.
27. Chen LS, Cummings SC. Inorg. Chem. 1978; 17: 2358.
28. Bax A, Freeman R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982; 104: 1099.
29. Frisch MJ, Trucks GW, Schlegel HB, Scuseria GE, Robb MA,
Cheeseman JR, Montgomery JA Jr, Vreven T, Kudin KN,
Burant JC, Millam JM, Iyengar SS, Tomasi J, Barone V,
Mennucci B, Cossi M, Scalmani G, Rega N, Petersson GA,
Nakatsuji H, Hada M, Ehara M, Toyota K, Fukuda R,
Hasegawa J, Ishida M, Nakajima T, Honda Y, Kitao O,
Nakai H, Klene M, Li X, Knox JE, Hratchian HP, Cross JB,
Bakken V, Adamo C, Jaramillo J, Gomperts R, Stratmann RE,
Yazyev O, Austin AJ, Cammi R, Pomelli C, Ochterski JW,
Ayala PY, Morokuma K, Voth GA, Salvador P, Dannenberg JJ,
Zakrzewski VG, Dapprich S, Daniels AD, Strain MC, Farkas O,
Malick DK, Rabuck AD, Raghavachari K, Foresman JB, Ortiz JV,
DFT calculations
The molecular geometries were optimised using the Gaus-
sian 03 suite of programs29 and B3LYP Density Func-
tional Theory (DFT) (Beckes exchange30 and a mix of
the built-in Gaussian-type basis sets). The 6-31G(d,p)
Copyright 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Magn. Reson. Chem. 2005; 43: 992–998