A. Latrofa et al. / Il Farmaco 60 (2005) 291–297
295
2H, CH2), 3.0 (t, 2H, CH2), 3.30 (s, 2H, CH2), 3.60 (s, 2H,
2.2. Antimicrobial assays
CH2), 4.22 (m, 2H, CH2), 7.0–7.40 (m, 7H, CHAr), 7.50–
7.60 (m, 2H, CHAr); m/z 378 (M+, 26), 287 (M+ –CH2C6H5,
base).
Compounds 5 and 8 were tested to evaluate their antimi-
crobial activity against a variety of gram-positive (B. subtilis
6633, E. faecalis 29212, S. aureus 6538p, S. aureus 25923)
and gram-negative bacteria (E. coli 25922, A. calcoaceticus
a1, A. calcoaceticus a2, P. aeruginosa 27853, K. oxytoca
49131), as well as against the yeasts (C. tropicalis 750, C. albi-
cans 14053, C. albicans 10231, S. cerevisiae 2366, C. lau-
rentii 18803).
The MICs (µg/ml) of compounds 5 and 8 were determined
by both microdilution broth method (MBM) and agar dilu-
tion method (ADM), the latter being a useful standardized
reliable susceptibility testing that may be used as a reference
for the evaluation of insoluble compounds of a series. Muel-
ler Hinton Broth (MHB) and Mueller Hinton Agar (MHA)
were used for the testing methods for bacteria, andYeast Malt
Broth (YMB) and Yeast Malt Agar (YMA) for yeast strains,
respectively.
For bacteria and yeast strains, the inocula were prepared
as follows: colonies derived from fresh mature strain on MHA
for bacteria or potato dextrose agar (PDA) for yeast plates
were suspended in saline solutions (0.85%) and suspensions
were adjusted approximately to 108 cfu/ml (0.5 Mac Far-
land) [16] for bacteria and 106 cfu/ml for yeast strain, as deter-
mined by viable count.
In the ADM, a series of twofold dilution in dimethyl sul-
foxide (DMSO) for the bacteria, or ethanol for yeasts, of each
tested product were prepared in MHA plates for bacteria, or
YMA plates for yeasts. Final product concentrations in the
Petri dish ranged 100–1.56 µg/ml. After drying for 30 min,
plates were spot inoculated by pipetting the desired test micro-
organism (40 µl for bacteria and 10 µl for yeasts) from the
prepared inoculum onto the plates [17]. The MICs were
recorded as the lowest concentration of antimicrobial agent
that inhibited visible growth for the two types of micro-
organisms after incubation for 24 h at 37 °C for bacteria and
48 h at 30 °C for yeasts.
2.1.3.5. 4-(Cyclo-octyl)-2-propionyl-2H-1,4-benzothiazin-
3(4H)-one (9a). Yield: 25%, oil;Anal (C, H, N) C19H25NO2S.
IR (cm–1) 1670, 1730 (C=O); 1H NMR (CDCl3) d (ppm): 1.0
(t, 3H, CH3), 1.40–2.80 (m, 16H, CH2), 4.22 (s, 1H, CH),
4.40–4.80 (m, 1H, CH), 6.90–7.40 (m, 4H, CHAr); m/z 331
(M+, 12), 165 (base).
2.1.3.6. 4-(Cycloheptyl)-2-propionyl-2H-1,4-benzothiazin-
3(4H)-one (9b). Yield: 20%, oil;Anal (C, H, N) C18H23NO2S.
IR (cm–1) 1670, 1720 (C=O); 1H NMR (CDCl3) d (ppm): 1.0
(t, 3H, CH3), 1.40–2.80 (m, 14H, CH2), 4.22 (s, 1H, CH),
4,30–4.60 (m, 1H, CH) 6.90–7.40 (m, 4H, CHAr); m/z 317
(M+, 22), 165 (base).
2.1.3.7. 4-(Cycloheptyl)-2′H-spiro-[1,4-benzothiazin-2,1′-
cyclopentane]-2′,3(4H)-dione (9d). Yield: 35%, oil; Anal (C,
H, N) C19H23NO2S. IR (cm–1) 1650, 1730 (C=O); 1H NMR
(CDCl3) d (ppm): 1.3–3.0 (m, 18H, CH2), 4.20–4.70 (m, 1H,
CH), 6.80–7.50 (m, 4H, CHAr); m/z 329 (M+, 42), 177 (base).
2.1.3.8. 1′-Benzyl-4-butyl-3′H-spiro[1,4-benzothiazine-2,4′-
piperidin]-3,3′(4H)-dione (9g). Yield: 30%, m.p. 58–60 °C;
Anal (C, H, N) C23H26N2O2S. IR (cm–1) 1660, 1720 (C=O);
1H NMR (CDCl3) d (ppm): 0.90 (t, 3H, CH3), 1.20–2.10 (m,
6H, CH2), 2.70–3.10 (m, 4H, CH2), 3.50-3.70 (m, 2H, CH2),
3.90–4.10 (m, 2H, CH2), 6.90–7.40 (m, 9H, CHAr); m/z 394
(M+, 71), 91 (base).
2.1.4. Procedure for the synthesis of compound 8h
Benzyl bromide (12 mmol) was added under nitrogen to
2-methyl benzothiazole (10 mmol) with stirring at 60–70 °C
for 3 h. The mixture was then cooled, the precipitate filtered
off, and washed with ether to give 3-benzyl-2-methyl-
benzothiazolium bromide. To the suspension of 3-benzyl-2-
methylbenzothiazolium bromide (5 mmol) in pyridine (5 ml),
isobutyryl bromide (10 mmol) was added under nitrogen with
stirring for 30 min. Then, ice water and dilute HCl were added
to the reaction mixture and extracted with chloroform
(3 × 20 ml). The organic layer was washed with 10% aque-
ous sodium bicarbonate (3 × 30 ml) and with water
(3 × 30 ml), dried over sodium sulfate, filtered, and the sol-
vent evaporated to give a solid, which crystallized from
ligroine afforded compound 8h whose physical and spectral
data are reported below.
In the MBM, for bacteria, a series of twofold dilution of
each product were prepared in DMSO and put in 96-well
microdilution trays containing broth media. Each well was
inoculated with 20 µl of a final inoculum concentration that
approximately contained 2.5 × 106 cfu/ml. The trays were
incubated at 37 °C for 24 h for bacteria. For yeasts, 100 µl of
inoculum containing 103 cfu/ml was used, then incubated for
48 h at 30 °C. The MICs were determined as the lowest con-
centration of the agent resulting in no growth. To determine
the MIC, we compared the growth in every well visually with
that of the growth control well for bacteria, and for yeasts,
the visual comparison of growth (50% inhibition) with that
2.1.4.1. 1-(3-Benzyl-1,3-benzothiazol-2(3H)-ylidene)-3-
methylbutan-2-one (8h). Yield: 55%, m.p. 133–135 °C; Anal
1
(C, H, N) C19H19NOS. IR (cm–1) 1610 (C=O); H NMR
Appropriate controls involved cefepime for bacteria and
fluconazole as international reference standards [18] for
yeasts. Also DMSO and ethanol alone were tested for their
activities against bacteria and yeasts, and consequently quan-
tities of these two solvents under 5% for DMSO and 2% for
(CDCl3) d (ppm): 1.1 (d, 6H, CH3), 2.60 (hept, 1H, CH), 5.20
(s, 2H, CH2), 5.92 (s, 1H, =CH), 7.0–7.40 (m, 8H, CHAr),
7.48–7.60 (m, 1H, CHAr); m/z 309 (M+, 44), 266 (M+;
–(CH3)2CH, 83), 91 (CH2C6H5, base).