S.-P. Zhu et al. / Chinese Chemical Letters 25 (2014) 229–233
231
Br
H
N
R
H
N
N
N
N
a
b
+
10
11
12
13a-j
13a R = H
13f R = 2-Cl
13g R = 3-Cl
13h R = 4-CH
13b R = 4-F
13c R = 3-F
13d R = 2-F
13e R = 4-Cl
C
CH
3
H
13i R = 4-OCH
3
N
N
13j R = 2,4-2Cl
c
N
N
10
14
N
e
N
Br
CH N
2
3
d
17
15
16
Scheme 2. Synthetic route of compounds 11–17. Reagents and conditions: (a) 1,3-dibromopropane, KOH, DMSO, r.t., 3 h, 32.4%–43.7%; (b) benzyl amine, K2CO3, DMF, 80 8C,
4 h, 16.4%–67.6%; (c) 3-bromoprop-1-yne, KOH, r.t., 4 h, 82.4%; (d) sodium azide, DMSO, r.t., 12 h, 100%; (e) VcNa, CuSO4, DMSO/H2O, r.t., 24 h, 89.6%.
(m, 13H, Ar-H), 4.46 (t, 2H, J = 6.9 Hz, NCH2CH2CH2NH), 3.65 (s, 2H,
phenyl-CH2), 3.29 (br, 2H, NCH2CH2CH2NH), 1.91–1.95 (m, 2H,
NCH2CH2CH2NH); MS (ESI) m/z: 315 (M+1).
3-(9H-Carbazol-9-yl)-N-(4-methoxybenzyl)propan-1-amine
(13i): 1H NMR (500 Hz, CDCl3):
6.84–8.15 (m, 12H, Ar-H), 4.45 (t,
2H, J = 6.9 Hz, NCH2CH2CH2NH), 3.72 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.56 (s, 2H,
phenyl-CH2), 2.48 (t, 2H, J = 6.9 Hz, NCH2CH2CH2NH), 1.89–1.92
(m, 2H, NCH2CH2CH2NH); MS (ESI) m/z: 345 (M+1).
d
3-(9H-Carbazol-9-yl)-N-(4-fluorobenzyl)propan-1-amine (13b):
1H NMR (500 Hz, CDCl3):
d 7.09–8.15 (m, 12H, Ar-H), 4.45 (t,
2H, J = 6.9 Hz, NCH2CH2CH2NH), 3.61 (s, 2H, phenyl-CH2), 2.48 (t,
2H, J = 6.5 Hz, NCH2CH2CH2NH), 2.26 (br, 1H, NH), 1.88–1.94 (m,
2H, NCH2CH2CH2NH); MS (ESI) m/z: 333 (M+1).
3-(9H-Carbazol-9-yl)-N-(2,4-dichlorobenzyl)propan-1-amine
(13j): 1H NMR (500 Hz, CDCl3):
d 7.71–8.71 (m, 11H, Ar-H), 5.02 (t,
2H, J = 6.6 Hz, NCH2CH2CH2NH), 4.26 (s, 2H, phenyl-CH2), 3.06 (br,
2H, NCH2CH2CH2NH), 2.46–2.51 (m, 2H, NCH2CH2CH2NH); MS
(ESI) m/z: 384 (M+1).
3-(9H-Carbazol-9-yl)-N-(3-fluorobenzyl)propan-1-amine (13c):
1H NMR (500 Hz, CDCl3):
d 7.13–8.15 (m, 12H, Ar-H), 4.46 (t,
2H, J = 6.9 Hz, NCH2CH2CH2NH), 3.65 (s, 2H, phenyl-CH2), 2.49 (br,
2H, NCH2CH2CH2NH), 2.30 (br, 1H, NH), 1.90–1.93 (m, 2H,
NCH2CH2CH2NH); MS (ESI) m/z: 333 (M+1).
2.3. Synthesis of 9-((1-benzyl-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)methyl)-9H-
carbazole (17)
3-(9H-Carbazol-9-yl)-N-(2-fluorobenzyl)propan-1-amine (13d):
1H NMR (500 Hz, CDCl3):
2H, J = 6.9 Hz, NCH2CH2CH2NH), 3.68 (s, 2H, phenyl-CH2), 2.51 (br,
2H, NCH2CH2CH2NH), 2.26 (br, 1H, NH), 1.89–1.95 (m, 2H,
NCH2CH2CH2NH); MS (ESI) m/z: 333 (M+1).
3-(9H-Carbazol-9-yl)-N-(4-chlorobenzyl)propan-1-amine (13e):
1H NMR (500 Hz, CDCl3):
2H, J = 6.9 Hz, NCH2CH2CH2NH), 3.62 (s, 2H, phenyl-CH2), 2.49 (br,
2H, NCH2CH2CH2NH), 1.90–1.93 (m, 2H, NCH2CH2CH2NH); MS
(ESI) m/z: 349 (M+1).
d
7.11–8.15 (m, 12H, Ar-H), 4.46 (t,
A suspension of (bromomethyl)benzene (0.86 g, 5.0 mmol,
5 equiv.) and NaN3 (0.36 g, 5.5 mmol, 5.5 equiv.) in DMSO (25 mL)
was allowed to stir overnight. Then, intermediate 14 (0.20 g,
1.0 mmol, 1 equiv.), an aqueous solution of sodium ascorbate
(0.01 mol/L, 10 mL, 0.1 equiv) and a copper sulfate solution
(0.005 mol/L, 2 mL, 0.01 equiv) were added under a nitrogen
atmosphere and was allowed to stir at ambient temperature for
24 h. The reaction mixture was diluted with water (20 mL) and
extracted with EtOAc (20 mL Â 3). The combined organic layer was
washed with brine (30 mL), dried over anhydrous MgSO4, filtered,
and concentrated in vacuo. The residue was purified by silica gel
column chromatography (hexane/EtOAc, 4:1, v/v) to give the
targeted compound 17 as a white solid (0.60 g, 89.6% yield). 1H-
d 7.17–8.15 (m, 12H, Ar-H), 4.45 (t,
3-(9H-Carbazol-9-yl)-N-(2-chlorobenzyl)propan-1-amine (13f):
1H NMR (500 Hz, CDCl3):
d
7.17–8.15 (m, 12H, Ar-H), 4.46 (t,
2H, J = 6.9 Hz, NCH2CH2CH2NH), 3.74 (s, 2H, phenyl-CH2), 2.54 (t,
2H, J = 7.2 Hz, NCH2CH2CH2NH), 1.90–1.93 (m, 2H,
NCH2CH2CH2NH); MS (ESI) m/z: 349 (M+1).
3-(9H-Carbazol-9-yl)-N-(3-chlorobenzyl)propan-1-amine (13g):
1H NMR (500 Hz, CDCl3):
7.17–8.15 (m, 12H, Ar-H), 4.47 (t,
NMR (500 Hz, CDCl3):
d 7.18–8.15 (m, 14H, Ar-H), 5.66 (s, 2H,
phenyl-CH2), 5.49 (s, 2H, carbazole-CH2). MS (ESI) m/z: 339 (M+1).
d
2H, J = 6.9 Hz, NCH2CH2CH2NH), 3.65 (s, 2H, phenyl-CH2), 2.49 (br,
2H, NCH2CH2CH2NH), 1.89–1.95 (m, 2H, NCH2CH2CH2NH); MS
(ESI) m/z: 349 (M+1).
2.4. In vitro antifungal activity assays
The in vitro antifungal activity was measured by means of the
MIC using the serial dilution method in 96-well microtest plates.
Test fungal strains were obtained from the ATCC or were clinical
isolates. The MIC determination was performed according to the
National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS)
recommendations using RPMI 1640 (Sigma) buffered with MOPS
3-(9H-Carbazol-9-yl)-N-(4-methylbenzyl)propan-1-amine (13h):
1H NMR (500 Hz, CDCl3):
d 7.08–8.15 (m, 12H, Ar-H), 4.45 (t, 2H,
J = 6.9 Hz, NCH2CH2CH2NH), 3.58 (s, 2H, phenyl-CH2), 2.48 (br, 2H,
NCH2CH2CH2NH), 2.27 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.89–1.92 (m, 2H,
NCH2CH2CH2NH); MS (ESI) m/z: 329 (M+1).