1102
T. Fujii et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 55 (2014) 1100–1103
steric repulsion between two large groups (enolate and ethyloxy-
LiO
OPh
carbonylmethyl) is minimum in TS2E. Other two possible transi-
tion state models, TS3E and TS4E are energetically unfavorable
because the unstable chelate is formed in TS3E and the steric
repulsion between two large groups (enolate and ethyloxycarbon-
ylmethyl) is relatively large in both models The models in Figure 4
also explain the trans-stereoselectivity of the reaction.
OPh
OEt
RO
RO
RO
O
O
Li
CO2Et
TS1E
TS2E
As the reaction conditions for the stereoselective formation of
compound 11 were optimized, the stereoselective formation of
compound 10 was then examined. We envisioned that when the
substrate with a Z-enoate is used for the reaction, TS2E in Figure 4
would be energetically unfavorable owing to the A(1,3)-strain.
Consequently, compound 9Z (Scheme 4) was prepared to exam-
ine the Michael reduction/intramolecular Michael reaction cas-
cade. The HWE reaction of Ando’s phosphonate 1511 with
aldehyde 14, which was obtained by the DIBAL-H reduction of
compound 7 (Scheme 3), stereoselectively afforded 8Z, which suc-
cessfully underwent the Pd-catalyzed carbonylation to afford 9Z.
Having prepared 9Z, we examined the Michael reduction/intra-
molecular Michael reaction cascade of 9Z (Table 2). No desired
products were formed in toluene, CH2Cl2, Et2O at À78 °C, and the
product derived from the first Michael reduction was obtained (en-
tries 1–4). The reaction in THF afforded compound 10 as the sole
product but the yield was low (entry 5). The reaction in a mixed
solvent (THF/DMF = 1:2) reduced the yield (22%, entry 6), but the
same reaction at 0 °C afforded compound 10 in 61% yield without
forming other isomers (entry 7). The reaction in DMF did not im-
prove the yield (24%, entry 8). Finally, the reaction in THF using
10.0 equiv of HMPA as an additive afforded compound 10 in 78%
yield as the sole isomer (entry 9). The reaction of 9Z with K-Select-
ride was also attempted (entries 10–12), but the yield was low
even though compound 10 was formed as the sole product.
The reaction of compound 9Z should proceed via the six-mem-
bered transition state, which has the equatorial methyl and TIPS-
oxy groups. Among four possible transition state models of
LiO
OPh
OPh
OLi
CO2Et
RO
CO2Et
TS3E
TS4E
Figure 4.
THF resulted in a low stereoselectivity (entry 7), but, interestingly,
the reaction in a mixed solvent (THF/DMF = 1:2) afforded 11 as the
sole product (entry 8). In all the reactions in Table 1, only trans-iso-
mers were formed. The results in Table 1 indicate that reactions of
9E in the relatively low-polar solvent (entries 1–5) afford com-
pound 10 as the major product, and reactions in the polar solvent
(entries 6–8) afford compound 11 as the major product.
Chamberlin reported that enolates which were generated by the
Michael reduction of
trapped as their Z-silyl enol ethers;10 hence, the enolate formed by
the Michael reduction of -methylene esters with L-Selectride
a-methylene ketones with L-Selectride were
a
could have an E-configuration. Considering the stereoselective
enolate formation by the Michael reduction, the stereoselectivity
of the intramolecular Michael reaction could be explained by the
proposed transition state models in Figure 4. Thus, in the less-polar
solvent, the enolate generated by the initial Michael reduction
could form a chelate with another
a,b-unsaturated ester to stabi-
lize TS1E. This would be an energetically favored, fused system
composed of a chair six-membered ring and a boat-chair eight-
membered ring to afford compound 10. On the other hand, the
reaction in the polar solvent could proceed via a non-chelated
TS2E owing to the solvation to afford compound 11 because the
Table 2
CO2Ph
CO2Et
L-Selectride
(1.2 equiv)
TIPSO
9Z
conditions, 2h
15
Triton B,
I
CO2Ph
CO2Et
CO2Ph
CO2Et
THF, 0 °C, 20 min
+
TIPSO
O
93% (8E/8Z = 1/10)
TIPSO
TIPSO
14
10
11
I
I
Entry
Solvent
Temp (°C)
Yielda (%)
Ratio
+
CO2Et
10
11
10:11
TIPSO
TIPSO
1b
2b
3b
4b
5
6
7
8
9
Toluene
CH2Cl2
Et2O
À78
À78
À78
À78
À78
À78
0
0
0
0
0
45
22
61
24
78
38
48
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
—
—
—
—
1:0
1:0
1:0
1:0
1:0
1:0
1:0
1:0
CO2Et
8E
8Z
Et2Oc
THF
Pd(PPh3)4, CO
TEA, PhOH
CO2Ph
THF/DMF = 1:2
THF/DMF = 1:2
DMF
8Z
THF, 50 oC
8 h, 68%
TIPSO
OEt
0
CO2Et
THFd
THF
À78
À78
À78
À78
10e
11e
12e
9Z
THF/DMF = 1:2
THF
O
P
O
a
b
c
o-MeC6H4O
o-MeC6H4O
Isolated yield.
LiClO4 (2.0 equiv) was added.
HMPA (2.0 equiv) was added.
HMPA (10.0 equiv) was added.
K-Selectride was used.
15
Scheme 4.
d
e