44
R. Buchtík et al. / Journal of Molecular Structure 1060 (2014) 42–48
refined on F2 using the full-matrix least-squares procedure (SHELXL-
97) [31]. Non-hydrogen atoms were refined anisotropically and
hydrogen atoms were located in difference Fourier maps and refined
by using the riding model, with CAH = 0.95, 0.98 and 0.99 Å,
NAH = 0.88 and 0.93 Å, and with Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq (CH, CH2, NH)
and Uiso(H) = 1.5Ueq (CH3). The crystal data and structure refine-
ments are given in Table 1. The molecular graphics as well as addi-
tional structural calculations were drawn using DIAMOND [32].
tetrazolium bromide] on human Caucasian osteosarcoma cells
(HOS; ECACC No. 87070202) and human Caucasian breast adeno-
carcinoma cells (MCF7; ECACC No. 86012803). Human cancer cell
lines were purchased from the European Collection of Cell Cultures
(ECACC). The cells were cultured according to the manufacturer’s
instructions and maintained at 37 °C and 5% CO2 in a humidified
incubator (100% humidity).
The cancer cell lines were treated with the tested compounds
for 24 h, using multi-well culture plates of 96 wells. The tested
compound (Et3NH)[Zn(qui)Cl2] and cisplatin were applied to the
2.2. Synthesis
cells at the concentrations of 0.01, 0.1, 1.0, 5.0, 25.0 and 50.0 lM.
In parallel, the cells were treated with vehicle (DMF; 0.1% v/v)
and Triton X-100 (1% v/v) to assess the minimal (i.e. positive con-
trol) and maximal (i.e. negative control) cell damage, respectively.
Cells were incubated with MTT for 3–4 h, after removal of the med-
ium and washing the cells with the phosphate buffer solution, for-
mazan dye was dissolved in DMF containing 1% of ammonia. The
MTT assay absorbance was measured spectrophotometrically at
540 nm (TECAN, Schoeller Instruments LLC). The data were ex-
pressed as the percentage of viability, when 100% and 0% represent
the treatments with DMF, and Triton X-100, respectively. The data
regarding the cancer cell lines were obtained from three indepen-
The starting ligand Hqui (2 mmol; 474 mg) was dissolved in
50 mL of hot ethanol and then Et3N (2 mmol; 275 lL) was slowly
added. To this mixture, a 10 mL of ethanolic solution of ZnCl2
(2 mmol; 270 mg) was added and refluxed for 1 h. After cooling
down, the solution was filtered and left to stand at ambient tem-
perature. Within two days, golden-yellow crystals of product
started to form. The crystals were filtered off and dried at 40 °C un-
der an infrared lamp. Yield: 628 mg (66%). Anal. Calcd for C21H26-
N2Cl2O2Zn (M = 474.7 g molꢁ1) (%): C, 53.1; H, 5.5; N, 5.9. Found:
C, 53.5; H, 5.8; N, 5.5.
ESI–MS: m/z 236 ([qui]ꢁ, 100%), 334 ([Zn(qui)ClAH]ꢁ, 18%), 372
([Zn(qui)Cl2]ꢁ, 3%), 535 ([Zn(qui)2AH]ꢁ, 3%).
dent cell passages. The obtained IC50 SD (lM) values together
with their standard deviations were calculated from viability
curves.
1H NMR (DMF-d7, TMS, d ppm) J (Hz): 1.28, 9H, t, (7.2), CH3;
3.24, 6H, q, (7.0), CH2; 7.29, 1H, t, (7.6), HC5; 7.42, 1H, t, (7.4)
HC13; 7.51, 3H, m, HC6,12,14; 7.93, 1H, d, (8.6) HC7; 8.24, 3H, d,
(8.2), HC4,11,15; 11.98, 1H, br, HN1.
3. Results and discussion
13C NMR (d7-DMF, TMS, d ppm): 8.9 (3CCH3), 46.7 (3CCH2), 118.8
(C7), 119.5 (C3), 122.0 (C5), 124.2 (C4), 128.1 (C12, 14), 128.5 (C6),
129.1 (C13), 129.3 (C11, 15), 131.4 (C9), 134.5 (C10), 135.9 (C1),
149.7 (C8), 172.9 (C2).
3.1. General characterization
The (Et3NH) [Zn(qui)Cl2] compound was obtained in the form of
pale golden-yellow crystals, while its purity, composition and
structure were based on the results following mainly from elemen-
tal analysis, mass spectrometry, NMR data and X-ray analysis. The
molar conductivity value of the studied complex dissolved in nitro-
methane equals 78.5 S cm2 molꢁ1, which fits in the 75–95 S cm2 -
molꢁ1 range that is characteristic for the 1:1 electrolyte for this
type of solvent [33].
FT IR (m
ATR/cmꢁ1): 242w, 268s, 274s, 288vs, 291vs, 310s, 330w,
378m, 391w, 450s, 472s, 492w, 549m, 646m, 660m, 693m, 715m,
729m, 764s, 800m, 834w, 910w, 926w, 999m, 1034m, 1126m,
1153m, 1213s, 1264s, 1365vs, 1388s, 1447vs, 1464vs, 1486vs,
1519s, 1561s, 1579m, 1628s, 2497s, 2629s, 2828br, 2978vs,
3004vs, 3056vs, 3140vs, 3170vs, 3201vs, 3228vs, 3500br.
2.3. In vitro cytotoxicity
3.2. X-ray crystallography
In vitro cytotoxicity of (Et3NH) [Zn(qui)Cl2] was determined by
an MTT assay [MTT = 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl-
The studied compound (Et3NH) [Zn(qui)Cl2] consists of the tet-
rahedral complex anions [ZnII(qui)Cl2]ꢁ and triethylammonium
(Et3NH+) cations (Fig. 1). The complex crystallizes as yellow planar
crystals in the P21/c space group (Table 1). The complex anions
consist of one the qui ligand coordinated to the Zn(II) atom in a
chelate manner through the keto (OK) and phenolate (OP) oxygen
atoms, and two chlorido ligands thus forming the {ZnO2Cl2} chro-
mophore with the tetracoordinated central Zn(II) atom (Fig. 1). The
ZnO bond lengths are of a similar length with a bit shorter ZnAOK
bond (1.9860(14) Å) in comparison to ZnOP (1.9961(14) Å). Two
chloride anions act as terminal ligands, with d(ZnCl) = 2.2509(6)
and 2.2266(6) Å. These chromophore bond lengths are comparable
to those reported previously for similar systems (Table 2).
The chromophore angles are strongly affected by the chelating
nature of the qui ligand, which induces the formation of a very nar-
row OKAZnAOP angle (85.12(6)°, Table 2). The remaining OZnCl
and ClZnCl angles are in the range of 108.7–117.6°, and such an
angular distortion of the coordination polyhedron is typical for
the tetrahedral complexes with chelating O,Oligands. As an exam-
ple, the bite angles of complexes [Zn(eaa)Cl2] and [Zn(aed)Cl2] can
be mentioned, in which the OAZnAO angles adopt values of
87.52(7)°, and 88.4(2)°, respectively (eaa = N,N0-ethylene-acety-
lacetonimine, aed = (2-hydroxy-4-methoxy acetophenone)ethy-
lenediamine) [37,38].
Table 1
Crystal data and structure refinement for (Et3NH) [Zn(qui)Cl2].
Formula
C21H26Cl2N2O2Zn
474.70
Yellow
Formula weight (g molꢁ1
Crystal color
Temperature (K)
Wavelength (Å)
Crystal system
Space group
a (Å)
)
150(2)
0.71073
Monoclinic
P21/c
12.0722(5)
9.7792(4)
18.7384(8)
90
b (Å)
c (Å)
a
(°)
b (°)
101.685(4)
90
2166.34(16)
4, 1.593
1.399
c
(°)
V (Å3)
Z, qcalc /g cmꢁ3
l
(mmꢁ1
)
F(000)
Final R indices
[I > 2 (I)]
984
R1 = 0.0264
wR2 = 0.0539
R1 = 0.0402
wR2 = 0.0558
0.903
r
R indices (all data)
GoF on F2
CCDC Ref. no
959886