.
Angewandte
Communications
which was serendipitously discovered during attempts to
utilize the LiBHEt3-mediated Payne rearrangement of 5.[10] It
was very difficult to install the furan with the a configuration
at the C9-position of 4 because the furan moiety is located on
the endo-face of this concave skeleton, and nucleophilic
attack or electrophilic attack would preferentially occur on
the less sterically hindered exo-face.[6a,11] The epoxide 5 could
be accessed from the [3.2.1]bicyclic ketone 6 by functional-
the nucleophile (6a in Scheme 2).[16] Double methylation of
10 produced the desired diene intermediate 11 in 93% yield.
Selective allylic oxidation at C9 of 11 with an excess of
tBuO2H (TBHP) in the presence of a catalytic amount of
SeO2 afforded the corresponding allylic alcohol 12 as the sole
stereoisomer (Scheme 2).[17] The hydroxy-directed epoxida-
tion of 12 with VO(acac)2/TBHP furnished the expected
epoxide 13 as the only product.[18] The subsequent oxidation
of 13 with Dess–Martin periodinane (DMP) provided the
diketone 14 in 87% yield, and its structure was confirmed by
the X-ray crystallography analysis.[19] Importantly, the opti-
cally pure diketone 14 (> 99% ee) could be readily obtained
after one recrystallization, thus providing a basis for the
enantioselective syntheses of (À)-1 and (+)-2. Chemo- and
stereoselective addition of trimethylsilyl furan lithium to the
C9 carbonyl group of 14 delivered the desired epoxide 5 in
72% yield.[20,21]
À
group manipulations. Accordingly, the C2 C8 bond of 6 could
be assembled by a palladium-catalyzed oxidative cyclization
of the known chiral cyclohexenone 7,[12,13] which has been
prepared by a palladium-catalyzed enantioselective decar-
boxylative allylation of 8, elegantly developed by Stoltz and
co-workers.[14,15]
Our synthesis commenced with the preparation of the
chiral cyclohexenone 7 in 85% ee following Stoltzꢀs proce-
dure, thus constructing the all-carbon quaternary stereogenic
center (Scheme 2).[14a] Treatment of 7 with LDA and TBSCl
With 5 in hand, LiBHEt3-mediated Payne rearrangement
was initially tested (Scheme 3). Surprisingly, treatment of 5
Scheme 3. Unexpected LiBHEt3-induced fragmentation of 5.
with LiBHEt3 at 308C not only afforded the epoxide
migration product 15 in 35% yield, but also led to the
isolation of an unexpected ketone (4) in 45% yield, and it is
the key late-stage intermediate in our retrosynthetic design.
Further optimizing the reaction conditions showed that 4
could be obtained as the sole product in 84% yield by
increasing the reaction temperature to 608C. In contrast,
decreasing the reaction temperature to 08C only gave the
epoxide 15 in 90% yield. To the best of our knowledge, this
LiBHEt3-induced fragmentation of such a-hydroxy epoxide
to the ketone has not been reported previously.[22]
To have preliminary insight on such an unprecedented
fragmentation reaction, the epoxide 15, resulting from the
Payne rearrangement was subjected to the reaction condi-
tions (LiBHEt3 at 308C or 608C), but it did not react to give
the desired ketone 4. This result implied that the rearrange-
ment product 15 was not the exact precursor of the
fragmentation reaction. Based on the literature and the
above facts, a plausible mechanism for the fragmentation/
protonation cascade process is proposed in Scheme 4. Firstly,
the ketone moiety on C3 is reduced and the C9 hydroxy group
is deprotonated with LiBHEt3 to form the alkoxide anion A.
When the reaction is run at low temperature, the epoxide
Scheme 2. Synthesis of 5. LDA=lithium diisopropylamide, TBS=tert-
butyldimethylsilyl, DME=ethylene glycol dimethyl ether, DMP=Dess–
Martin periodinane, DMSO=dimethyl sulfoxide, HMPA=hexamethyl-
phosphoric triamide, THF=tetrahydrofuran, VO(acac)2 =vanadyl ace-
tylacetonate.
led to the corresponding TBS enol ether, which underwent
oxidative cyclization upon exposure to a catalytic amount of
Pd(OAc)2 under an atmosphere of O2 to give the desired
[3.2.1]bicyclic ketone 6 in 77% overall yield.[14] Conjugate
addition of a vinyl group to 6 afforded the ketone 10 with
a satisfactory diastereomeric ratio (d.r. = 10:1). The observed
high preference for re-face attack can be easily explained by
the steric hindrance between the allylic hydrogen atom and
ꢀ 2015 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 13599 –13603