8228 J . Org. Chem., Vol. 63, No. 23, 1998
Anderson et al.
8-Qu in olin ecar bon itr ile (9). 8-Quinolinyltrifluoromethane-
sulfonate (0.50 g, 1.8 mmol), CuI (0.034 g, 0.18 mmol), NaCN
(0.18 g, 3.6 mmol), and Pd(PPh3)4(0.10 g, 0.087 mmol) were
charged to a round-bottom flask. Acetonitrile (5 mL) was
added, and the mixture was heated to reflux for 1 h. Reaction
workup was accomplished employing the standard method.
The product was purified by silica gel chromatography (30%
ethyl acetate in hexanes) to give 0.24 g of the desired product
(87%). Mp 87.5-88.3 °C; TLC Rf ) 0.3 (30% ethyl acetate in
hexanes); IR (CHCl3) 2232 cm-1; 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 8.94 (dd,
1H, J ) 1.2, 4.2 Hz), 8.15 (dd, 1H, J ) 1.0, 8.5 Hz), 8.0-7.96
(m, 2H), 7.52-7.42 (m, 2H); 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 152.0, 146.9,
136.2, 135.1, 132.6, 127.6, 125.5, 122.4, 116.9, 112.5; mass
spectrum, m/z (FIA, M + 1) 155. Anal. Calcd for C10H6N2:
C, 77.91; H, 3.92; N, 18.17. Found: C, 77.94; H, 4.08; N, 18.06.
8-Cyan o-4,10b-dim eth yl-1,2,3,4,4a,5,6,10b-octah ydr oben -
zo[f]qu in olin -3-on e (10). The aryl bromide31 (1.07 g, 3.47
mmol), CuI (0.07 g, 0.4 mmol), NaCN (0.36 g, 7.3 mmol), and
Pd(PPh3)4 (0.21 g, 0.18 mmol) were charged to a round-bottom
flask. Propionitrile (5 mL) was added, and the mixture was
heated to reflux for 2h. Reaction workup was accomplished
employing the standard method. The product was purified by
silica gel chromatography (ethyl acetate) to give 0.73 g of the
desired product (83%). Mp 146-147.4 °C; TLC Rf ) 0.38 (ethyl
acetate); IR (CHCl3) 2231, 1630 cm-1; 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 7.33-
7.28 (m, 3H), 3.40 (dd, 1H, J ) 3, 13 Hz), 2.95-2.88 (m, 5H),
2.53-2.48 (m, 2H), 2.29-2.22 (m, 2H), 1.81-1.71 (m, 2H), 1.04
(s, 3H); 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 170.4, 149.4, 135.3, 132.7, 129.7,
126.0, 118.8, 110.2, 61.1, 37.8, 32.0, 29.5, 29.1, 27.9, 21.9; mass
spectrum, m/z (FIA, M + 1) 255. Anal. Calcd for C16H18N2 O:
C, 75.56; H, 7.13; N 11.01. Found: C, 75.89; H, 7.21; N, 10.97.
(Z)-6-[2-Cya n o-1-(3-flu or op h en yl)eth en yl]-1-[(1-m eth -
yleth yl)su lfon yl]-1H-ben zim id a zol-2-a m in e (13). The cor-
responding vinyl bromide32 (2.00 g, 46 mmole), CuI (0.16 g,
0.84 mmol), KCN (0.60 g, 9.2 mmol), and Pd(PPh3)4 (0.52 g,
0.45 mmol) were charged into the reaction flask. Acetonitrile
(40 mL) was added, and the resulting mixture was heated to
50 °C for 90 min. The reaction mixture was cooled to room
temperature. The mixture was filtered through a plug of silica
gel, and the solid cake was washed with ethyl acetate followed
by a wash with methylene chloride until the eluting solution
was colorless. The filtrate was concentrated to a solid. The
solid was stirred in ethyl acetate and washed with water
followed by a wash with brine. The organic phase was dried
over anhydrous Na2SO4 and filtered. The filtrate was con-
centrated to 1.5 g of an amorphous white solid (85% yield). 1H
NMR (DMSO) δ 7.9 (s, 1H), 7.7-7.0 (m, 6H), 5.9 (s, 2H), 5.5
(s, 1H), 3.8 (m, 1H), 1.4 (d, 6H); IR (CHCl3) 2215, 1640, 1608
cm-1, MS m/z (FID) 384. Anal. Calcd for C19H17N4O2SF: C,
59.36; H, 4.46; N, 14.57. Found: C 59.41; H 4.57; N 14.03.
the proposed mechanism albeit the reactions were mark-
edly slower when compared to the more optimal Pd-
(PPh3)4/CuI catalyst system.
Although these experiments establish the proposed
mechanism to have predictive value, other possibilities
remain viable. For example, Lewis acids are known to
accelerate the nickel-catalyzed diene hydrocyanation
reaction.26 If operative in the present case, a Lewis acid
effect is not general nor does it correlate with the acidity
of the addends. For example, copper (I) iodide is a more
effective adjutant than copper(II) triflate. Moreover, the
presence of other Lewis acids such as MgBr2 does not
afford appreciable acceleration of the Pd(0)-catalyzed
conversion of 3a to 4 (5% conv, 3 h, THF).
Con clu sion
A novel cocatalyzed cyanation reaction involving Pd-
(0) catalysts has been developed that provides efficient
and reproducible access to aryl nitriles. The process,
studied in greatest detail for a CuI/Pd(PPh3)4 catalyst
system, appears to be mechanistically distinct from the
copper effect involved in the palladium-catalyzed cross-
coupling reaction.18 The new process allows efficient con-
version of aryl and vinyl halides as well as aryl triflates
to the corresponding nitrile derivatives utilizing potas-
sium or sodium cyanide. Palladium-catalyzed cyanation
reactions were demonstrated to be uniformly sluggish or
to stall completely in the absence of the cocatalyst.
Several different copper sources and zinc(II) iodide were
shown to accelerate the palladium(0)-catalyzed reaction.
The copper cocatalyst extended the effectiveness of both
Pd(PPh3)4 and [Pd2(dba)3]‚CHCl3-DPPF mediated pro-
cesses. This convenient and reliable protocol eliminates
the harsh reaction conditions and excessive metal waste
which are characteristic of previous existing methods.
Exp er im en ta l Section
All solvents were deoxygenated by a subsurface N2 purge
for 30-45 min immediately prior to use. High-pressure liquid
chromatography (HPLC) was performed using a Zorbax RX-
C8 column (4.6 mm i.d. × 25 cm) with diode array UV
detection. Similar absorption coefficients (>95%) were estab-
lished for the starting material and product at the monitored
wavelength. Gas chromatography (GC) was performed using
a Fisher Scientific DB-1 capillary column (30 m; film thickness
0.25 mm). Products were compared to authentic samples ob-
tained commercially for compounds 4, 6a -c, 11, and 12. Spec-
tral data for 727 and 828 were compared with reported values.
Pd(PPh3)4 was prepared as previously described.29
Commercially available CuI (Aldrich, 99.999%) was typically
purified;30 however, experiments in which the reagent was
used directly provided similar results. All other catalysts were
purchased and used without further purification. NaCN
(Mallinckrodt, 99.40%) and KCN (Fisher, g98%) were finely
ground and stored in a vacuum oven (100-150 °C) prior to
use.
Ack n ow led gm en t. The authors thank Dr. Leland
Weigel and Mr. David Varie for helpful discussions and
the supply of selected substrates employed in this study.
Mr. J oseph Pawlak is also gratefully acknowledged for
helpful discussions.
J O9808674
(25) The adduct of KCN with B(Ph)3 is well-known, see Brehm, E.;
Haag, A.; Hesse, G. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1970, 737, 80.
(26) Kreutzer, K. A.; Tam, W. WO 9611182 A1.
(27) Randall, W. C.; Streeter, K. B.; Cresson, E. L.; Schwam, H.;
Michelson, S. R.; Anderson, P. S.; Cragoe, E. J ., J r.; Williams, H. W.
R.; Eichler, E.; Rooney, C. S. J . Med. Chem. 1979, 22, 608.
(28) Liu, Y.; Hong, Y..; Svensson, B. E.; Cortizo, L.; Lewander, T.;
Hacksell, U. J . Med. Chem. 1993, 36, 4221.
Rep r esen ta tive P r oced u r e. The substrate (3.94 mmol),
KCN (0.51 g, 7.88 mmol), Pd(PPh3)4 (0.228 g, 0.197 mmol), and
CuI (0.394 mmol) were placed in a flask which was flushed
with N2. Solvent (5 mL) was added via syringe. The resulting
mixture was heated to reflux under N2 with vigorous agitation
by a magnetic stirrer and sampled at 15 min intervals. The
mixture was cooled to room temperature, diluted with ethyl
acetate (30 mL), and then filtered through Celite. The filtrate
was washed with water and brine, dried over anhydrous
MgSO4, and concentrated by rotary evaporation. Purification
was accomplished by silica gel chromatography.
(29) Coulson, D. R. Inorg. Synth. 1972, 15,121.
(30) Kauffman, G. B.; Teter, L. A. Inorg. Synth. 1963, 7, 9.
(31) (a) Audia, J . E.; Neubauer, B. L. US 95-408745 950321; E. P.
733365 A2 960925. (b) Wiegel, L. O. Chiral 97, Boston, MA. May 13,
1997.
(32) Werner, J . A.; Dunlap, S. E.; Frank, S. A.; Dunigan, J . M.; Copp,
J . D.; Ginah, F. O. Presented at the 215th ACS National Meeting,
ORGN 239, Dallas, TX, March 29, 1998.