N. Raman et al. / Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy 125 (2014) 404–413
409
1409–1419 cmꢁ1, respectively for all the metal complexes. These
results reveal that the organic ligand is involved in the coordina-
tion through the carboxyl group. Conclusive evidence of the bond-
ing is also shown by the observation that new bands in the spectra
of all metal complexes appearing in the low frequency regions at
indicate the non-coupled mononuclear complexes of diluted d8
system with s = 1 spin state of octahedral geometry [16,17]. Mono-
meric nature of nickel complexes is further proved by their micro
analytical data. The electronic absorption spectra of the diamag-
netic [Zn(L1)2], [Zn(L2)2] and [Zn(L3)2] show that the bands at
29,411, 35,842, 29,498, 35,460, 29,325 and 35,971 cmꢁ1 are
assigned to intraligand charge transfer transitions [18].
500–584 cmꢁ1 and 420–449 cmꢁ1 characteristic to
t(MAO) and
t(MAN) stretching vibrations respectively, that are not observed
in the spectra of free ligands.
EPR spectra
1H NMR spectra
EPR studies of paramagnetic transition metal(II) complexes
yield information about the distribution of the unpaired electrons
and hence about the nature of the bonding between the metal
ion and its ligands. The X-band EPR spectra of all copper(II) com-
plexes were recorded in DMSO at liquid nitrogen temperature
and at room temperature. The spin Hamiltonian parameters of
the complexes have been calculated and summarized in Table 2.
The EPR spectra of the copper(II) complexes at room temperature
show one intense absorption band in the high field and is isotropic
due to the tumbling motion of the molecules [19]. However, these
complexes at liquid nitrogen temperature show three well-
resolved peaks with low intensities in the low field region
(Fig. S2) and one intense peak in the high field region. From this
spectral data, it is found that A|| 150 for [Cu(L1)2], 150 for
[Cu(L2)2] and 160 for [Cu(L3)2] > A\105 for [Cu(L1)2], 90
for [Cu(L2)2] and 85 for [Cu(L3)2], g|| (2.3407, 2.3051 and 2.3147
for [Cu(L1)2], [Cu(L2)2] and [Cu(L3)2]) > g\ (2.0601, 2.0472 and
2.0591 for [[Cu(L1)2], [Cu(L1)2] and [Cu(L3)2]) > 2.0027, In all the
three, g|| and g\ values are greater than 2.04, consistent with cop-
per(II) in axial symmetry with all the principal axes aligned paral-
lel. These g values indicate an elongated tetragonally distorted
octahedral stereochemistry [20]. From the values of g factors, it
is determined the geometric parameter G, representing a measure
of exchange interaction between Cu(II) centres in polycrystalline
compound, using the formula [21]
The 1H NMR spectra of the Schiff bases (L1), (L2) and (L3) and
their zinc complexes were recorded at room temperature in CDCl3.
The 1H NMR spectra of ligand (L1) and its [Zn(L1)2]Cl2 are given in
Figs. S1a and S1b (Supplementary file). 1H NMR spectrum of the
Schiff base ligand shows peaks at 6.6–7.4 d which are attributed
to phenyl multiplet of Schiff base ligand (obtained from the con-
densation of 4-aminoantipyrine and furfuraldehyde). The ligand
also shows the following signals: CACH3 2.3–2.4 d(s), NACH3
3.1–3.3 d(s); CH@N 9.3 d(s) and 6.62, 6.94 and 7.83 d for furfurylid-
ene moiety. The azomethine proton ACH@N signals in the spectra
of the zinc complexes are shifted to down field (9.6 d) compared to
the free ligands, suggesting deshielding of azomethine group due
to the coordination with metal ion. There is no appreciable change
in all other signals of the complexes. The peak at 11 d is attributed
to the ACOOH of amino acid (glycine/alanine/valine) moiety pres-
ent in Schiff bases. The absence of this peak noted for the zinc(II)
complexes confirms the loss of the COOH proton of amino acid
moiety due to complexation.
Magnetic moments and electronic spectra
The free Schiff base ligands (L1/L2/L3) exhibit two intense
bands in 29,240 & 37,075 (L1), 29,411 & 35,335 (L2) and 29,450
& 35,575 cmꢁ1 (L3) which are due to
p–
p⁄ and n–p⁄ transitions
respectively. In all metal complexes, the absorption bands are ob-
G ¼ gk ꢁ 2:0027=g? ꢁ 2:0027
served in the regions 35,842–37,453 and 29,375–29,761 cmꢁ1
which are due to p–
p⁄ and n–p⁄ transitions. These transitions ex-
If G < 4, it is considered the existence of some exchange interaction
between Cu(II) centres and if G > 4, the exchange interaction is neg-
ligible. The present copper complexes have G values greater than 4
indicating exchange interaction is either absent or very little in the
solid complexes. The empirical ratio of g||/A|| is frequently used to
evaluate distortion in copper(II) complexes. If this ratio is close to
100, it indicates roughly a square-planar structure around the cop-
per(II) ion and the values from 170 to 250 are indicative of distorted
tetrahedral geometry. If the ratio is in between 110 and 170, it indi-
cates nearly an octahedral environment around copper(II) ion with
small distortion [22]. For the present copper complexes, the g||/A||
values are 156, 153 and 144 cmꢁ1 which indicate that all the three
complexes have distorted octahedral geometry.
hibit blue or red shift due to the coordination of the ligand with
metal ions. The electronic spectra of [Cu(L1)2], [Cu(L2)2] and
[Cu(L3)2] complexes exhibit one broad band at 11,050, 11,049
and 12,254 cmꢁ1 respectively with low intensity hump which is
assigned to 2Eg ? 2T2g transition. The above data reveal that the
Cu(II) complexes adopt distorted octahedral geometry around the
central metal ion. The observed magnetic moments of the com-
plexes (1.87, 1.85 and 1.86 BM respectively) at room temperature
indicate the non-coupled mononuclear complexes of magnetically
diluted d9 system with s = 1/2 spin state of distorted octahedral
geometry [15]. The monomeric nature of the complexes is further
supported by micro analytical and mass spectral data. The elec-
tronic spectra of [Co(L1)2], [Co(L2)2] and [Co(L3)2] complexes show
three broad bands in the regions 11,025, 14,903, 29,280, 12,150,
13,774, 29,325 and 11,049, 12,500, 29,761 cmꢁ1 respectively
The covalency parameters a2 (covalent in-plane
and b2 (covalent in-plane
-bonding) have been calculated using
the following equations. If
2 = 1.0, it indicates complete ionic
character whereas
2 = 0.5 denotes 100% covalent bonding, with
r-bonding)
p
a
4
4
4
which are assigned to T1g(F) ? 4T2g(F), T1g(F) ? 4A2g(F) and T1g
(F) ? 4T2g(P). These data reveal that complexes have octahedral
geometry. The observed magnetic moments of cobalt(II) complexes
(4.94, 4.83 and 4.91 BM) at room temperature indicate the mono-
meric nature of the complexes. It is further supported by micro
analytical data. The electronic spectra of [Ni(L1)2], [Ni(L2)2] and
[Ni(L3)2] complexes show three bands of low intensity in the visi-
ble region around 11,695, 12,820 and 24,937 cmꢁ1, 11,049, 12,468
and 29,411 cmꢁ1 and 11,061, 12,642, and 29,498 cmꢁ1 which are
a
assumption of negligible small values of the overlap integral.
a2 ¼ ðA =0:036Þ þ ðg ꢁ 2:0027Þ þ 3=7ðg? ꢁ 2:0027Þ þ 0:04
k
k
b2 ¼ ðgk ꢁ 2:0027ÞE=ðꢁ8ka2
Þ
c2 ¼ ðg? ꢁ 2:0027ÞE=ðꢁ2ka2
Þ
assigned to A2g(F) ? 3T2g(F), A2g(F) ? 3T1g(F) and A2g(F) ? 3T1g
(P) transitions respectively suggesting an octahedral geometry
around Ni(II) ion. The observed magnetic moments of Ni(II) com-
plexes (3.08, 3.16 and 3.07 BM respectively) at room temperature
where k ¼ ꢁ828 cmꢁ1 for free copper ion and E is electronic transi-
3
3
3
tion energy. From Table 1, the observed b2 (0.7732) and 2 (0.5214)
c
values for [Cu(L1)2], b2 (0.6730) and
c
2 (0.3923) values for [Cu(L2)2]
and for [Cu(L3)2] b2(0.7804) and c2 (0.5682) indicate that there is