A. S. Pankova, M. A. Kuznetsov / Tetrahedron Letters 55 (2014) 2499–2503
2501
cycloadducts. Moreover, they were the only products in reactions
with the least active dipolarophile – dimethyl fumarate (8) (Table 1,
entries 4 and 8). Compounds 12a,b are orange solids, which were
poorly soluble in common organic solvents, and they usually
precipitated from benzene during the course of the reaction.
As mentioned above, all our attempts to isolate aziridine 4c
were unsuccessful and therefore we decided to add dipolarophiles
to the filtered reaction mixture immediately after oxidative amin-
oaziridination of 2-(4-methylbenzylidene)-1H-indene-1,3(2H)-
dione (3c). As a result, with N-phenylmaleimide (5) (2 equiv) after
1.5 days at room temperature, a precipitate formed which after
purification was identified as adduct 9c (Table 1). For other dipol-
arophiles 6–8, TLC monitoring of the reaction mixtures showed
disappearance of the spot that we tentatively assigned to the initial
aziridine 4c and formation of one new compound (orange spot
with Rf = 0.25 (SiO2, CH2Cl2)). However, our attempts to isolate this
product by crystallization or column chromatography failed. It
does not appear to be a cycloaddition product or an oxazole, since
such instability would not be expected by replacement of NO2 or Cl
substituents in stable analogues by a methyl group. We speculate
that decomposition of the three-membered ring occurs. The aziri-
dine fragment in compounds 4a–c is a part of a spirosystem where
two substituents on one carbon atom are strongly bonded with
each other. The ‘spiroactivation’ effect that appeared, for example,
in apparently much easier ring cleavage of spiro-1,1-diacylcyclo-
propanes than that of their monocyclic analogues,31,32 may have
an analogous influence on the stability of aziridines 4a–c as well.
Cleavage of the C–N bond followed by destruction of the whole
cycle may begin to dominate over concerted C–C cleavage in the
sequence 4a ? b ? c that may cause a decrease in yield, and even
disappearance of cycloaddition products (Table 1, entry 10).
The pyrrolidine protons in adducts 9a–c and 11 form simple
ABX systems, but it is well known that the values of their vicinal
coupling constants do not serve as unequivocal evidence of their
spatial relations.33 Therefore we used 2D 1H NOESY to confirm
the trans-orientation of the former aziridine proton and the pro-
tons of dipolarophile in the pyrrolidine ring of these compounds
(Table 1), which corresponds to the less sterically strained config-
uration of these products. In the 1H NMR spectra of compounds
10a,b the signals of the ring protons were observed as singlets at
6.97 and 6.86 ppm, respectively, which is consistent with the
structure of a 3-pyrroline, but not a 2-pyrroline.
atom of the 1,3-dipole; this is a known process for 2-acyl-substi-
tuted N-phthalimidoaziridines.4,34 The decrease in dipolarophile
activity in the sequence 5 ? 8 disfavors 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition
and gives oxazoles preferentially (Table 1). This is in agreement
with the fact that the activation barrier for the cycloaddition de-
pends on both the ylide and dipolarophile structures. In the pres-
ence of less active ylide ‘traps’, various intramolecular processes
come into play and their rates depend primarily on the aziridine
substituents.35 Among them, 1,5-electrocyclization is obviously
favorable because the required s-cis-orientation of an acyl substitu-
ent and terminal ylide carbon atom is inherent to ylides 13
(Scheme 2).
Less electron-withdrawing groups at the para-position in aziri-
dines 4a–c not only lead to milder reaction conditions for the
cycloaddition (75 °C for NO2 group, 55 °C—Cl, 25 °C—CH3), but also
to increased instability of the aziridine ring (aziridine 4c, Table 1,
entry 10). A similar dependence was also observed for 2,3-disubsti-
tuted N-phthalimidoaziridines36 so it proves in general that push–
pull aziridines with substituents of opposite electronic character
on neighboring carbon atoms form azomethine ylides easier than
those possessing only electron-withdrawing groups. While this
phenomenon has already been explored to increase the reactivity
of donor-acceptor substituted cyclopropane rings toward cycload-
dition,37,38 to the best of our knowledge, this is the first demonstra-
tion of analogous effects in aziridine scaffolds (compare6,7).
Since more stable spiroaziridines were obtained with electron-
withdrawing substituents, for practical reasons, we decided to fo-
cus on these when extending the substrate scope. Thus, we pre-
pared four additional N-phthalimidoaziridines 15a–d possessing
diverse electron-withdrawing groups on the aryl ring, including a
3-pyridyl moiety (Scheme 3). The starting arylideneindendiones
14a–d were synthesized in 69–73% yields from salt 2 in the same
manner as for the aforementioned substrates (Scheme 1), with
the exception of 3-pyridyl-substituted compound 14d where basic
conditions were more suitable (see the Experimental section for
details). Oxidative addition of N-aminophthalimide readily gave
target aziridines 15a–d.
NPhth
O
O
O
O
PhthNNH2, Pb(OAc)4, K2CO3
CH2Cl2, 0 oC, 0.5 h
N
Thus, the structures of all adducts 9–11 are in accordance with a
concerted mechanism of 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition of azomethine
ylides 13, generated thermally from aziridines 4a–c, to the dipol-
arophile (Scheme 2). These results are in agreement with our pre-
vious findings on the chemistry of N-phthalimidoaziridines.4,6,7
Oxazoles 12a,b originate from 1,5-dipolar electrocyclization of
the intermediate azomethine ylide 13 facilitated by the unavoid-
able proximity of any of the two keto groups to the terminal carbon
Ar
Ar
14a-d
15a, 81%,
b
, 80%,
Ar = 4-MeO2CC6H4 (a), 4-NCC6H4 (b),
4-F3CC6H4 (c), 3-pyridyl (d)
c
, 89%,
d, 71%
Scheme 3. Preparation of aziridines 15a–d.
EWG
NPhth
O
O
N
O
NPhth
Ar
Ar
EWG
N
EWG
EWG
NPhth
O
O
O
O
O
O
NPhth
Ar
Δ
N
N
9-11
12
Ar
O
N
O
NPhth
Ar
N
4a-c
- PhthNH
O
Ar
13
Scheme 2. Plausible mechanisms for the formation of adducts 9–11 and oxazoles 12.