Communication
Dalton Transactions
preparation of 2 (Fig. S2†), which disappeared during the reac-
tion, may be indicative of in situ formation of the potassium
salt 3. Compound 3 can then smoothly react with the present
chloroborane 1 resulting in the formation of 2. To support this
presumption, the reaction of isolated 3 with one molar equi-
valent of 1 was performed and, indeed, it provided a mixture
of rac-RR/SS-2 and meso-2 in nearly quantitative yield as judged
by NMR spectroscopy. This means that 3 may serve as a com-
peting reagent to potassium metal during the formation of 2
(Scheme 1). In the light of these facts, we are not able to dis-
tinguish between these two mechanisms (I or II) at the
moment, but it seems probable that 2 is formed by both of
them simultaneously. It is noteworthy that analogous C–C
coupling reactions have been recently observed for α-iminopyr-
idyl substituted Ge, Al, Ga, and Zn complexes and lanthanide
(Yb, Sm) derivatives of redox active ligands.15 Compound 3
also readily reacts with simple electrophiles such as MeI or
Me3SiCl; in this case formation of substituted 1H-2,1-benzaza-
boroles 4 and 5 (Scheme 2) was observed. Compounds 4 and 5
Fig. 3 View of the polymeric structure of 3 (30% thermal ellipsoids;
hydrogen atoms omitted; symmetry operators: a = 1 − x, −1/2 + y, 1 − z
b = 1 − x, 1/2 + y, 1 − z). Selected bond lengths (Å): K(1)–O(1) 2.668(2),
K(1)–B(1) 3.192(2), K(1)–N(1) 3.1541(18), K(1)–C(1) 3.028(2), K(1)–C(2)
2.882(2), K(1)–C(7) 2.965(2), K(1)–B(1b) 3.479(2), K(1)–N(1b) 3.3388(17),
K(1)–C(1b) 3.123(2), K(1)–C(2b) 2.838(2), K(1)–C(7b) 2.992(2), B(1)–N(1)
1.460(3), C(1)–B(1) 1.517(3), C(1)–C(2) 1.455(3), C(2)–C(7) 1.381(3), C(7)–
N(1) 1.418(3).
1
were characterized by elemental analysis and H, 11B, 13C, 15N
and 29Si NMR spectroscopy (see details in the ESI†).
In summary, compound 3, a potassium salt of the first
structurally characterized BN analogue of the indenyl anion,
has been prepared by unusual two step reduction of the start-
ing chloroborane 1 involving both C–C bond coupling and
subsequent C–C bond cleavage reactions. This approach
seems to be applicable to the preparation of related main
group element aromatic systems. Furthermore, 3 is able to
react not only with simple electrophiles leading to quantitative
formation of benzazaboroles 4 and 5, but also it converts with
chloroborane 1 into C–C coupled compound 2, thereby
opening up a new strategy for the preparation of such C–C
bridged heterocyclic systems. Finally, compound 3 represents
a promising starting material for the preparation of indenyl-
like metal complexes. All these possibilities are now being
examined in our labs.
of the five-membered C3BN ring of the 1H-2,1-benzazaborolyl
moiety and the potassium atom.
One of the C3BN rings coordinates to the K(1) ion in an
approximately η5-fashion. The bond lengths describing this
bonding interaction [K(1)–N(1) 3.1541(18), K(1)–C(1) 3.028(2),
K(1)–C(2) 2.882(2), K(1)–C(7) 2.965(2) and K(1)–B(1) 3.192(2) Å]
are similar to those observed for the only structurally charac-
terized alkali metal analogue, i.e. lithium 1,2-azaborolyl
reported by Schmid11 considering different radii of both alkali
metals. In contrast, the interaction between the K(1) atom and
the second C3BN ring may be considered as η2-type mediated
by C(2b) and C(7b) atoms [K(1)–C(2b) 2.838(2) and K(1)–C(7b)
2.992(2) Å]. The difference in coordination of both C3BN rings
is supported by distances between K(1) and centroids of the
respective C3BN rings being 2.787 (η5 ring) vs. 2.913 Å (η2
ring). The B(1)–N(1) bond length [1.460(3) Å] is slightly shorter
than the corresponding distance observed in the lithium 1,2-
azaborolyl [1.503(6) Å], while other bond distances within the
C3BN ring are comparable to this lithium compound.11
The Grant Agency of the Czech Republic (project no. P207/
12/0223) is acknowledged for financial support.
Notes and references
The mechanism of formation of 2 is also of particular inter-
est. Compound 2 may be formed by fast12 recombination of
two carbon centred radicals, formed by reduction of 1 with
potassium (Mechanism I in Scheme 1). It is worth noting that
analogous C–C reductive coupling has been recently reported
by Nozaki et al. during reduction of base-stabilized difluoro-
boranes.13 Furthermore, the same working group clearly
showed that even their stable N-coordinated heterocyclic
boron radical may be described by several resonance struc-
tures, but the carbon centred radical has the major contri-
bution to the structure.14 All these facts support Mechanism I
(Scheme 1). Despite these facts, the second mechanism (Mech-
anism II in Scheme 1) came into mind. The appearance of
intensive red colour at the interface between the potassium
mirror and the reaction mixture in the Schlenk tube during
1 For reviews see: (a) M. J. D. Bosdet and W. E. Piers,
Can. J. Chem., 2008, 86, 8 and references cited therein;
(b) A. J. Ashe III, Comprehensive Heterocyclic Chem. III, 2008,
ch. 4.17, vol. 4, p. 1190 and references cited therein.
2 For example see: (a) G. Schmid, Comments Inorg. Chem.,
1985, 4, 17 and references cited therein; (b) G. Schmidt,
Comprehensive Heterocyclic Chem. II, 1996, vol. 3, ch. 3.17,
p. 739; (c) G. Schmid and M. Schütz, J. Organomet. Chem.,
1995, 492, 185; (d) G. Schmid, O. Boltsch and R. Boese,
Organometallics, 1987, 6, 435.
3 For example see: (a) A. J. Ashe III, Organometallics, 2009,
28, 4236; (b) S. Y. Liu, M. M. C. Lo and G. C. Fu, Tetra-
hedron, 2006, 62, 11343; (c) S. Y. Liu, M. M. C. Lo and
G. C. Fu, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2002, 41, 174; (d) H. Yang,
9014 | Dalton Trans., 2014, 43, 9012–9015
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014