Angewandte
Chemie
regioselectivity, despite having oxidation potentials in the
vicinity of + 2.0 V vs. SCE (entries 5 and 6). As a result of its
volatility, 3.0 equivalents of 2-methyl-2-butene were
employed in the reaction.
In accord with our previous work in this area, we propose
that the mechanism of this transformation begins with
excitation of the mesityl acridinium catalyst 1 by l = 450 nm
light, with subsequent single-electron oxidation of the alkene
by 1* (Scheme 1). Reversible addition of triflylamide to the
Figure 3. Scope of the intermolecular anti-Markovnikov hydroamina-
tion reactions with heterocyclic amines. All reactions irradiated with
a 15 W 450 nm LED flood lamp. All yields are those of the isolated
products (average of two trials). Values within parentheses indicate the
ratio of N1 substitution to N2 substitution. [a] Used 3.0 equiv imid-
azole.
Scheme 1. Proposed mechanism for the intermolecular anti-Markovni-
kov alkene hydroamination reaction. HAT=hydrogen-atom transfer.
solubility with various solvent combinations were unsuccess-
ful (50% yield; entry 3). 1,1-Disubstituted styrenes did not
react productively with triflylamide but were reactive toward
1,2,3-triazole (entries 5 and 6). For 1,2,3-triazole, substitution
at N1 was led to the major regioisomer as expected, because
of the statistical advantage and increased electron density of
N1/N3 over N2.[13] This reaction class should be of potential
interest to the biomedical community as tool for lead-drug
candidate discovery.
less-substituted position of 2 results in the formation of
tertiary radical 3, which reacts with a hydrogen-atom donor,
presumably thiophenol, to furnish the final adduct 4. How
thiophenol is generated is less clear. One potential mecha-
À
nism involves homolysis of the S S bond, either directly by
light, or by energy transfer from 1*, thus giving rise to the thiyl
radical 5. This oxidizing radical could reset the acridinium
catalyst by oxidation of the long-lived acridine radical 6. This
process seems feasible given the thiyl radical/thiophenoxide
redox couple (Ep/2 =+ 0.16 V vs. SCE)[9] and the acridinium
redox potential (E1/2ox = À0.49 V vs. SCE),[10] thus ensuring
that the redox event would be exergonic by nearly 15 kcal
molÀ1. Subsequent protonation generates the putative hydro-
gen-atom-transfer reagent, thiophenol. In previous control
experiments, if thiophenol was employed as the cocatalyst,
varying quantities of phenyl disulfide were observed in the
crude reaction mixture, thus implicating the disulfide/thio-
phenol equilibrium.
Finally, we were able to employ heterocyclic amines as
nucleophiles in this setting, thus providing access to poten-
tially valuable nitrogen heterocycles (Figure 3).[11] We
observed good reactivity between methoxy-substituted sty-
renes and pyrazole, indazole, and 1,2,3-triazole. Indazole gave
a single N2 regioisomeric product, congruent with prior
observations of indazole alkylation selectivity under nonbasic
conditions (entry 2).[12] The addition of poorly soluble imid-
azole gave a slightly lower yield and attempts to improve its
In conclusion, we have demonstrated an anti-Markovni-
kov intermolecular hydroamination reaction of alkenes and
amines employing a novel organic photoredox catalyst
system. The broad reaction scope extends to trisubstituted
aliphatic alkenes and a- and b-substituted styrenes with
a variety of functional groups such as halides, esters, alcohols,
and protected amines. The amine coupling partner can be
triflamide or heterocyclic amines. Though extended reaction
times are required, this method expands the limited arena of
anti-Markovnikov hydroamination for the direct addition of
sulfonamides to alkenes. We are actively probing the mech-
anism of this and associated transformations as to the exact
nature of the redox cycle and involvement of phenyl disulfide
in the reaction mechanism.
Experimental Section
A magnetic stir bar, N-Me-mesityl acridinium catalyst (1, 1.0 mol%),
phenyldisulfide (10 mol%), and the amine (1.5 equiv) were added to
a flame-dried 2 dram vial. The reaction vessel was purged with
nitrogen, then 2,6-lutidine (25 mol%), the alkene (1.0 equiv), and
dichloromethane (sparged for 15 min, [0.5m]) were added. The vial
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 1 – 5
ꢀ 2014 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
3
These are not the final page numbers!