ChemComm
Communication
Table 1 Biological evaluation of the ligands on Bcl-xL/Bak and Mcl-1/Bid
displacement assays
Bcl-xL/Bak binding
Mcl-1/Bid binding
affinitya Ki (nM)
affinitya Ki (nM)
b
b
Entry
Compound
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1
8300 Æ 1200
511 Æ 79
5200 Æ 1200
494 Æ 63
106 Æ 10
252 Æ 38
460 Æ 62
465 Æ 21
1022 Æ 48
622 Æ 35
559 Æ 76
17
2a
2b
2c
2d
2e
2f
153 Æ 5
1044 Æ 48
423 000
1079 Æ 91
1829 Æ 30
1909 Æ 43
1013 Æ 236
2g
a
Binding affinities were measured by fluorescence polarization25 after
b
competition between the ligand and a fluorescein-labeled peptide. Ki is
the concentration of the ligand corresponding to 50% of the binding of the
labelled reference compound, corrected for experimental conditions.26
derivative 2a exhibits an excellent affinity for Bcl-xL and Mcl-1
(entry 3) of the order of 100 nM, so fifty times more active
than 1. These very good results show that an elongation of the
molecule on the side chain could improve the affinity, and the
nitrogen atom of the pyridyl substituent seems to be very
important for the interaction with the binding sites of Bcl-xL
and Mcl-1. Compound 2c, with three aromatic rings on this
side chain, shows selectivity for Mcl-1 with an affinity of 460 nM
(entry 5).
To get insight into the molecular determinants of the
interaction between these compounds and their protein
targets, molecular docking of compound 2a was carried out
with a conformer of Bcl-xL that is appropriate for the inter-
action with the meiogynin A family, generated previously27
using a ligand-driven conformer selection from molecular
dynamics simulations. The global positioning of the ligand in
the binding site is similar to those observed for meiogynin A,27
showing hydrophobic interactions with most of the residues
from the binding site, and additional hydrogen bond inter-
actions of the biaryl ether oxygen and the pyridyl nitrogen with
the side chains of residues Arg100 and Tyr195, respectively
(Fig. 2A). These interactions might explain, in part, the inter-
esting inhibitory activity determined for compound 2a. Com-
pound 17 exhibits a similar binding mode (Fig. 2B), although
no hydrogen bond is established with the protein, and this
probably contributes to the decreased inhibitory activity deter-
mined for 17 compared to 2a. In agreement with the biological
data, compound 2c could not be positioned in the binding site
as it was evidenced by carrying out the docking simulations
with constraints (Fig. 2C).
Fig. 2 Docking complexes of compounds 2a (A), 17 (B) and 2c (C) with a
selected conformer of Bcl-xL.
Mcl-1 pan inhibitors 2a was elaborated, as well as a selective
Mcl-1 inhibitor 2c. In this way, the affinity for Bcl-xL and Mcl-1
could be modulated by a simple modification on the side chain
of the molecule. Further biological evaluations are underway.
The authors thank the French Agence Nationale pour la
Recherche (ANR2010-JCJC-702-1) for financial support.
Notes and references
´
1 (a) J. Rosen, J. Gottfries, S. Muresan, A. Backlund and T. I. Oprea,
J. Med. Chem., 2009, 52, 1953–1962; (b) J. Gu, Y. Gui, L. Chen,
G. Yuan, H.-Z. Lu and X. Xu, PLoS One, 2013, 8, 1–10.
2 D. J. Newman and G. M. Cragg, J. Nat. Prod., 2012, 75, 311–335.
3 (a) M. Davids and A. G. Letai, J. Clin. Oncol., 2012, 30, 3127–3135;
(b) G. Lessene, P. E. Czabotar and P. M. Colman, Nat. Rev. Drug
Discovery, 2008, 7, 989–1000; (c) C. Billard, Mol. Cancer Ther., 2013,
12, 1691–1700.
4 N. Bajwa, C. Liao and Z. Nikolovska-Coleska, Expert Opin. Ther. Pat.,
2012, 22, 37–55.
5 M. F. V. Delft, A. H. Wei, K. D. Mason, C. J. Vandenberg, L. Chen,
P. E. Czabotar, S. N. Willis, C. L. Scott, C. L. Day, S. Cory, J. M.
Adams, A. W. Roberts and D. C. S. Huang, Cancer Cell, 2006, 10, 389–399.
6 (a) P. S. Jeng and E. H. Cheng, Nat. Chem. Biol., 2013, 9, 351–352;
(b) A. S. Hazmi and R. M. Mohammad, J. Cell. Physiol., 2009, 218,
13–21.
7 J. Wei, S. Kitada, J. L. Stebbins, W. Placzek, D. Zhai, B. Wu, M. F. Rega,
Z. Zhang, J. Cellitti, L. Yang, R. Dahl, J. C. Reed and M. Pellecchia,
J. Med. Chem., 2010, 53, 8000–8011 and references cited.
8 C. A. Goard and A. D. Schimmer, Core Evidence, 2013, 8, 15–26 and
references cited.
9 T. Song, X. Li, X. Chang, X. Liang, Y. Zhao, G. Wu, S. Xie, P. Su,
Z. Wu, Y. Feng and Z. Zhang, Bioorg. Med. Chem., 2013, 21, 11–20
and references cited.
10 Y. Tanaka, K. Aikawa, G. Nishida, M. Homma, S. Sogabe, S. Igaki,
Y. Hayano, T. Sameshima, Y. Miyahisa, T. Kawamoto, M. Tawada,
Y. Imai, M. Inazuka, N. Cho, Y. Imaeda and T. Ishikawa, J. Med.
Chem., 2013, 56, 9635–9645.
These studies make obvious that compound 2c cannot adopt
the same binding mode as 2a or 17 because of a very important
steric clash between the protein surface (mainly the side chains
of Arg100 and Tyr195) and the 4-amido substituent.
In conclusion, an efficient asymmetric synthesis of various
meiogynin A analogues has been developed based on a multiple
11 M. Dow, M. Fisher, T. James, F. Marchetti and A. Nelson,
Org. Biomol. Chem., 2012, 10, 17–28.
fragment strategy. Their precursor 17 was prepared on a multi- 12 M. Litaudon, H. Bousserouel, K. Awang, O. Nosjean, M.-T. Martin,
´
M. E. Tran Huu Dau, H. A. Hadi, J. A. Boutin, T. Sevenet and
gram scale via a key Diels–Alder cycloaddition reaction with
an excellent yield of 44% in nine steps and with a very good e.r.
Through this approach, one of the most potent Bcl-xL and
´
F. Gueritte, J. Nat. Prod., 2009, 72, 480–483.
´ ´
´
´
13 D. F. Fotsop, F. Roussi, A. Leverrier, A. Breteche and F. Gueritte,
J. Org. Chem., 2010, 75, 7412–7415.
This journal is ©The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014
Chem. Commun., 2014, 50, 8593--8596 | 8595