ˇ
´
4339
A. Knezevic et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 55 (2014) 4338–4341
Table 1
Testing different conditions for the synthesis of compound 1
Scheme 1. Retrosynthetic pathway toward 1.
Solvent
Base
T (°C)
t (h)
Conversiona (%)
described for similar compounds.7 However, as in numerous other
cases, amide bond formation turned out to represent a significant
challenge.11
The preparation of 1-phenyl-allylamine (4) from cinnamyl
alcohol (3) includes an Overman reaction, which has been
well-described in the literature.12 The hydroxyl group was intro-
duced to Boc protected 1-phenyl-allylamine (6) via hydrobora-
tion–oxidation using 9-BBN as the hydroboration reagent
(Scheme 2).
The hydroxyl group in 7 was replaced with an azide using
diphenylphosphoryl azide (DPPA) as the azide source.13 The
reaction was performed in dry toluene with 1,8-diazabicycloun-
dec-7-ene (DBU) as the base. The first step of the reaction, which
was performed at room temperature, was the formation of the
diphenylphosphate, which can easily be isolated, and the azide salt
of DBU. By raising the temperature, nucleophilic substitution of the
diphenylphosphate group with azide occurs. The resulting
Boc-protected 3-azido-1-phenyl-propylamine (8) was difficult to
purify from excess DPPA, so the crude residue was deprotected
with trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) in dichloromethane to afford pure
3-azido-1-phenylpropylamine (5).
The remaining step for the synthesis of 1 was assumed to follow
the same path as the synthesis of structurally similar reported
compounds RS41A and RS194B.7,14 The previously described con-
densation of ethyl glyoxylate with hydroxylamine provided ethyl
glyoxylate oxime (9).15 The formation of an amide between ethyl
glyoxylate oxime and an amine was reported in EtOH at 50 °C.
However, in our case, reaction at 50 °C, as well as in boiling EtOH,
did not produce the desired product. Addition of Et3N as a base
provided a somewhat poor conversion. The search for a solvent
and base that would result in a satisfactory conversion of the reac-
tants into the desired product was unsuccessful.
EtOH
EtOH
—
Et3N
Et3N
Reflux
Reflux
100
80
80
80
100
110
100
24
72
24
24
24
24
48
48
48
2
0
26
0
0
0
0
0
8
0
1,4-Dioxane
1,4-Dioxane
1,4-Dioxane
1,4-Dioxane
Diglyme
Diglyme
DMSO
THF
—
—
DIPEA
1,2,4-Triazole/DBU
DMAP
DIPEA
DIPEA
DIPEA
KOt-Bu
—
rt
0
17
18
MW-110
MW-95
0.5
0.5
DIPEA
a
Conversion of the product was determined using HPLC with UV detection at
220 nm.
our reaction. CAL-B is a very selective biocatalyst in enzymatic res-
olution of primary amines, as well as an excellent tool for amide
bond formation.18 However, the test enzymatic reaction of amine
5 and ester 9 using CAL-B did not proceed as desired. The target
product was obtained, but in very low yield. We first assumed that
these poor results were the consequence of the somewhat ambig-
uous placement of ester 9 in the active site of the enzyme due to its
oxime group. In fact, oximes are used as nucleophiles in enzyme-
catalyzed oximolysis for the preparation of oxime esters.19
Although these activated oxime esters are known to react with
amines to give amides,20 the success of amide formation depends
on the structures of the amines and oxime esters.21
Therefore, to exclude the possibility of other side reactions, the
oxime group was protected using a 2-methoxyethoxymethyl ether
(MEM) protecting group (Scheme 3), starting from ethyl glyoxylate
(12). Next, the reaction of the obtained ester 10 with amine 5 was
examined. As was the case with unprotected oxime 9, the desired
product was obtained in low yield using the classic [EtOH,
N,N-diisopropylethylamine (DIPEA), reflux for 48 h, 16% yield], as
well as the enzymatic approach (Table 2). However, some solid
was isolated which was insoluble in methyl tert-butyl ether
(MTBE) and diisopropyl ether (DIPE), but was very soluble in
dichloromethane. NMR and MS analysis of the solid showed that
this substance (13, see Scheme 4) was actually the salt of amine
5 and hydrolyzed ester 10.
Microwave-assisted reactions, which are known to be very fast
and straightforward, also proved unsuccessful.16,17 MW irradiation
of 5 and 9, with or without an additional base, for 30 min under
solvent-free conditions did not demonstrate enhanced conversion
compared to reactions in boiling EtOH. Longer reaction times did
not increase the conversion, however new peaks appeared in the
HPLC chromatogram indicating the formation of by-products. The
results of several attempts to carry out this reaction are presented
in Table 1.
Considering the results listed in Table 2, it was clear that hydro-
lysis of ester 10 catalyzed by the enzyme was faster than the
expected amide bond formation reaction. It is generally known
that during enzyme-catalyzed aminolysis, even traces of water
cause hydrolysis of the acyl donor, which is why such reactions
must be performed in dry solvents.18,23 DIPE is a solvent which
probably contains a sufficient amount of water to prevent amide
formation. Hence, salt 13 was isolated in almost quantitative yield
(96%), indicating that under these reaction conditions complete
Bearing in mind our previous experience with Candida
antarctica lipase B (CAL-B),10 we decided to test this enzyme for
Scheme 2. Synthesis of 3-azido-1-phenylpropylamine (5).
Scheme 3. Synthesis of the MEM-protected oxime 10.