H. Singh et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. xxx (2014) xxx–xxx
5
NF-9 (with p-bromo phenyl, IC50 = 8.93
l
M). NF-4 was almost 36
mode of inhibition of NF-2, NF-4 and NF-12 is mixed-type but it
seems that they have a strong competitive component.
folds and NF-2 was 5 folds more active than NF-3. Similar pattern
was observed for NF-9 and NF-7 which was around 3.5 folds and 2
folds more active than NF-8. Overall the preference order for posi-
tioning of the substituents follows the order: para > ortho > meta. It
was also observed that the nature of substituents at p-position
influenced the activity as substituents with a stronger ÀI (Induc-
tive) effect such as fluoro, nitro and bromo remarkably favoring
the inhibitory potential in comparison to the substituents with
stronger +R (Resonance) (OCH3) and hyper conjugation effect
(CH3) (Compare NF-2, 4, 12 with NF-14, 15). The remarkable inhib-
itory potential of NF-4 possessing fluoro substituted (para) phenyl
ring could be attributed to the presence of fluorophilic environ-
ments in the cavity of enzyme. In general, F substituents on ligands
prefer to orient toward electropositive regions of receptor sites21
and this has led to the increased use of this element to enhance
the binding affinity to the target protein.22 Moreover the ability
of fluorine to get involved in hydrogen bonding/dipolar interac-
tions have also been evidenced through number of reports.22,23
Thus fluorine effect could be the probable reason for the significant
inhibition of xanthine oxidase by NF-4.
Table 2 represents the inhibitory potential of NF-2, 4, 9, 12 (dis-
playing IC50 values <10 lM) at five different concentration.
Figure 2 represents the % age inhibition of potent naphthoflav-
ones against xanthine oxidase.
Figure 3 represents the plot of V versus [I] for the most potent
inhibitor, that is, NF-4.
Enzyme kinetic study was also studied for the potent com-
pounds. The Lineweaver–Burk plot (Fig. 4) revealed that com-
pounds NF-2, NF-4, NF-12 were mixed-type XO inhibitors. The
pattern of graph shows that it is a form of mixed inhibition sce-
nario. The Km, Vmax and slope are all affected by the inhibitor.
The inhibitors have increased the Km and slope (Km/Vmax) while
decreasing the Vmax. Moreover carefully observing the Figure 4, it
was found that intersecting lines on the graph converge to the left
of the y-axis and above the x-axis which indicates that the value of
In order to understand the binding conformation of NF-4 (most
potent XO inhibitor), it was docked using the GOLD software.25 into
the salicylic acid binding site of XO.26
To validate the docking procedure, the salicylic acid was
extracted from the original X-ray structure of XO (1FIQ)26 and
docked using GOLD. The highest scoring conformation was
selected and compared with original X-ray structure conformation.
The docked conformation of salicylic acid was found to be the sim-
ilar with the original X-ray structure. The root mean square devia-
tion (RMSD) between the best scored conformation from docking
and X-ray structure was found to be 0.21 Å.
The best fit conformation of NF-4 was selected on the basis of
Chemplp scoring function and visual inspection. The Figure 5
shows the binding conformation of the NF-4 at the binding site
of XO. The binding site residues and overall binding mode was
found to be similar to those observed with salicylic acid26 and fab-
uxostat.27 The NF-4 gets stabilized by various electrostatic and
hydrophobic interactions. In docking pose, the naphthyl ring (ring
A and B) of NF-4 was found sandwiched between Phe914 and
Phe1009. The Phe914 and Phe1009 are involved in ‘face-to-face’
and ‘face-to-edge’ pai–pai stacking interactions, respectively with
NF-4. This arrangement of energetically favorable arene/arene
interactions28 is also present in the co-crystal structure of XO with
salicylate23 and fabuxostat.27 Its conservation argues for an impor-
tant role in stabilizing the binding positions of aromatic inhibitors
and also represent one of the key features of substrate recognition
(Fig. 5).7 Two crucial H-bond interactions were observed between
NF-4 and binding residues of XO. Here, first H-bond was formed
between hydroxyl group of Ser876 and carbonyl group of ring C
(d = 1.91 Å; h = 145.9°). Also, the fluorine atom at ring D is involved
in H-bond interaction with side chain N–H of Asn768 (d = 2.24 Å;
h = 101.1°). This can be suggested that these H-bonds may contrib-
ute significantly towards the binding free energy between NF-4
and XO. The ring D of NF-4 face towards the side chain of
Leu648 and showed the hydrophobic interaction (Fig. 5).
a
(a constant that defines the degree to which inhibitor binding
affects the affinity of the enzyme for substrate) is greater than
1.24 This confirms that the inhibitor preferentially binds to the free
enzyme and not the enzyme substrate complex. Therefore, the
The present study employs molecular hybridization technique
for the design of naphthoflavones as hybrids of naphthopyrans
and flavones (two previously reported classes of xanthine oxidase
Figure 5. Binding interactions of NF-4 with the amino acid residues.