.
Angewandte
Communications
5% yield as indicated by 1H NMR spectroscopy. Further
experimentation revealed that replacement of the phosphine-
bound cyclohexyl groups with phenyl (L2) or tert-butyl (L3)
resulted in catalysts which were less effective. Increasing the
steric bulk of the ligandꢀs biaryl backbone did not lead to
further improvement (entries 5 and 6). Employing bidentate
phosphine ligands such as dppp (L6) also furnished the C1-
cyanation product, albeit in lower yields, while the use of
binap (L7) provided less than 5% product under otherwise
identical reaction conditions. Among various bidentate phos-
phine ligands examined, DPPBz (L8) gave the best results,
thus providing 3a in 95% yield along with less than 5% of
3c.[12] Other commonly used electrophilic cyanating agents
such as TsCN were ineffective for the current transformation
(entry 11).
We next explored the substrate scope with respect to the
vinylarene component (Scheme 2). A variety of 2-vinylnaph-
thalenes bearing electron-donating or electron-withdrawing
functional groups were converted into the C1-cyanated
product in good yields (4b–h). C3 cyanation was not observed
for any of the cases examined. Sterically hindered substrates
could be successfully transformed with this method (4i and
4j), and 1-vinylnaphthalenes also represented excellent sub-
strates (4k and 4l). Further, a heterocyclic vinylarene (4m) as
well as those bearing pendent heterocyclic motifs (4n–p) were
compatible. By using the L8-based catalyst, 2-(prop-1-en-2-
yl)naphthalene and 2-(prop-1-en-1-yl)naphthalene also
reacted to provide the cyanation products, albeit in lower
yields (see the Supporting Information). Finally, styrene can
also be cyanated in a similar fashion (73%) using the L8-
based catalyst, although other simple aromatic substrates
such as 4-methoxystyrene afforded lower yields of the desired
product (30–40%).
To demonstrate the synthetic versatility of the products
derived from this method, several derivatization reactions
were performed (Scheme 3). Oxidation of the boronate
afforded the alcohol 5a,[13] while the BCl3-mediated amina-
Scheme 2. Substrate scope of vinylarenes. Reaction conditions: vinyl-
arene (0.20–1.0 mmol), 2 (1.2 equiv), B2Pin2 (1.1–1.2 equiv), LiOtBu
(1.5 equiv), CuCl (20 mol%), L1 (22 mol%), 1,4-dioxane (0.30m),
808C or L8 (22 mol%), THF (0.40m), 608C, 12 h. Yields reported are
that of the isolated material. Yields within parentheses were deter-
mined by 1H NMR analysis of the crude reaction mixture using 1,1,2,2-
tetrachloroethane as an internal standard. Yield of isolated product
were lower than yields determined by 1H NMR spectroscopy because
of product decomposition on silica gel. Boc=tert-butoxycarbonyl,
MOM=methoxymethyl, TMS=trimethylsilyl.
to use the benzylcopper intermediate B, generated from
hydrocupration[7] or borocupration[9] of the styrenes A, in
a subsequent electrophilic functionalization process. In an
attempt to develop a cyanoborylation reaction, we unexpect-
À
edly found that the ortho C H functionalized product 3a was
generated in 90% yield upon treatment of 2-vinylnaphtha-
lene (1) with the electrophilic cyanating agent NCTS (2)[10] in
the presence of a copper catalyst derived from CyJohnPhos[11]
(L1; Table 1, entries 1 and 2). Notably, cyanation at the less
sterically congested C3-position (3b) was not observed and
the benzylic cyanation product 3c was obtained in less than
Scheme 3. Derivatization of borylation/cyanation products. Reaction
conditions: a) NaOH/H2O2, RT, 2 h, 85%. b) BCl3, CH2Cl2, RT, 4 h,
then BnN3, 08C, 16 h, 63%. c) ArCl, 5 mol% RuPhos Precat, 5 mol%
RuPhos, K3PO4, toluene/H2O, 808C, 12 h, 60%. d) Conc. HCl/MeOH,
608C, 12 h, 95%. e) NiCl2·6H2O, NaBH4, Boc2O, MeOH, 08C to RT,
1 h, 65%. f) NaN3, ZnBr2, H2O/iPrOH, 1008C, 48 h, 92%.
2
ꢀ 2014 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 1 – 6
These are not the final page numbers!