2894 Lakshmi et al.
Asian J. Chem.
toluene at 100 °C for 24 h. The starting material was completely
consumed and giving the required product 6,12-dimethyl-6-
phenyl-5,6-dihydroindolo[1,2-c]quinazoline (3a) in 78 % yield
(Entry 1, Table-1). The scope of this transformation was further
explored by treating 1 with different terminal alkynes such as
but-3-ynylbenzene (2b) and oct-1-yne (2c), the expected
products 3b and 3c obtained in 71 and 76 % respectively
(Entries 2 and 3, Table-1). Next, the substituents amino and
hydroxyl groups present on the aromatic alkynes are also well
tolerated under the present reaction conditions. Thus when 3-
ethynylaniline (2d) and 3-ethynylphenol (2e) were treated with
1 gave the corresponding products 3d and 3e with 62 and 68 %
respectively (Entries 4 and 5, Table-1). Later sterically hindered
ethynylcyclohexane (2f) on treated with 1 gave 3f in 76 %
yield (Entry 6, Table-1). Unfortunately, the presence of electron
withdrawing group present on the aromatic alkyne, i.e., 1-
ethynyl-4-nitrobenzene (2g) was found to be inert under
present reaction conditions (Entry 7, Table-1). Finally when 1
treated with hex-1-yne (2h) gave 3h with 75 % yield (Entry 8,
Table-1).
Yield
(%)
Entry
Compd. 2
Compd. 3
6
76
7
100
8
75
TABLE-1
SYNTHESIS OF FUSED INDOLO[1,2-c]QUINAZOLINES
Yield
(%)
Entry
Compd. 2
Compd. 3
Conclusion
We developed Au(I)-catalyzed cascade reactions for the
synthesis of new fused indolo[1,2-c]quinazolines from 2-(3-
methyl-1H-indol-2-yl)aniline and alkynes in the presence of
2 mol % Ph3PAuOTf catalyst in toluene at 100 °C for 24 h.
1
80
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The author is thankful to CSIR for Senior Research
Fellowship.
2
71
REFERENCES
1. (a) L. Zhou, D.S. Bohle, H.-F. Jiang and C.-J. Li, Synlett, 937 (2009);
(b) X.-Y. Liu and C.-M. Che, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 48, 2367 (2009);
(c) K. Gräbe, B. Zwafelink and S. Doye, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 5565
(2009); (d) K. Alex, A. Tillack, N. Schwarz and M. Beller, Org. Lett.,
10, 2377 (2008); (e) K. Alex, A. Tillack, N. Schwarz and M. Beller,
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 47, 2304 (2008); (f) X.-Y. Liu, P. Ding, J.-S.
Huang and C.-M. Che, Org. Lett., 9, 2645 (2007); (g) L. Ackermann
and A. Althammer, Synlett, 3125 (2006); (h) C. Cao, Y. Li, Y. Shi and
A.L. Odom, Chem. Commun., 2002 (2004); (i) B. Ramanathan, A.J.
Keith, D. Armstrong and A.L. Odom, Org. Lett., 6, 2957 (2004); (j) H.
Siebeneicher, I. Bytschkov and S. Doye, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 42, 3042
(2003); (k) C. Cao, Y. Shi and A.L. Odom, Org. Lett., 4, 2853 (2002).
2. (a) A.N. Cayley, K.A. Gallagher, C. Ménard-Moyon, J.P. Schmidt, L.J.
Diorazio and R.J.K. Taylor, Synthesis, 3846 (2008); (b) C. Zhang, C.K.
De, R. Mal and D. Seidel, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 130, 416 (2008); (c)
K.M. Shakhidoyatov, Z.U. Samarov, N.I. Mukarramov, M.G.
Levkovich, N.D. Abdullaev, B. Tashkhodzhaev, Y. Barakat and B.A.
Urakov, Chem. Nat. Compd., 43, 441 (2006); (d) W.R. Bowman, M.R.J.
Elsegood, T. Stein and G.W. Weaver, Org. Biomol. Chem., 5, 103 (2007);
(e) M. Decker, F. Krauth and J. Lehmann, Bioorg. Med. Chem., 14,
1966 (2006); (f) D.R. Ijzendoorn, P.N.M. Botman and R.H. Blaauw,
Org. Lett., 8, 239 (2006); (g) S. Rault, S. Jolivet-Fouchet, F. Fabis, P.
Bovy and P. Ochsenbein, Heterocycles, 51, 1257 (1999); (h) S. Jolivet-
Fouchet, F. Fabis, P. Bovy, P. Ochsenbein and S. Rault, Tetrahedron
Lett., 39, 819 (1998); (i) M. Yamato and Y. Takeuchi, Chem. Pharm.
Bull. (Tokyo), 30, 1036 (1982); (j) For general reviews, see: S.B. Mhaske
and N.P. Argade, Tetrahedron, 62, 9787 (2006); (k) L. Orfi, F. Waczek,
3
76
4
62
5
68