2-Piperidone Type of Chiral Building Block
J . Org. Chem., Vol. 64, No. 13, 1999 4915
Sch em e 1
To verify the utility of the above 3-piperidinols as chiral
building blocks for alkaloid synthesis, we planned the
diastereodivergent synthesis of the 3-piperidinol alkaloids
(+)-prosafrinine,9 (-)-iso-6-cassine,10 (-)-prosophylline,11
and (-)-prosopinine.12
Herein, we wish to document the potential for a general
use of 1 in alkaloid synthesis via the above 3-piperidinol
building blocks (I-IV).
Relative stereochemistry of (-)-1 was verified with an
X-ray analysis.
With the enantiomeric pair of scalemic 1 in hand, we
next examined the determination of the absolute stere-
ochemistry of (-)-1 by its conversion to known piperidine
(-)-3.4 Protection of the hydroxyl in (-)-1 with MOMCl
afforded ether (-)-4, which was reduced with Super-
Hydride15 to yield alcohol (-)-5. Treatment of (-)-5 with
(PhS)2 and Ph3P in pyridine provided phenylthioether
(-)-6 which was desulfurized with Raney Ni (W-4) to give
piperidone (-)-7. Conversion of (-)-7 to benzyl ether (-)-
8, which was subjected to homologation at the lactam
carbonyl by Eschenmoser’s sulfide-contraction reaction
via thiolactam (-)-9 to provide vinylogous urethane (+)-
10. Catalytic hydrogenation of (+)-10 over Pd(OH)2
followed by protection of the resulting amine with ClCO2-
Me afforded the desired cis-(2,6)-piperidine (-)-11, which
was converted to MOM ether (-)-12 in the usual manner.
This stereoselectivity may be attributed to the steric
hindrance, by which the catalytic hydrogenation occurs
from the less hindered site (R-face) of (+)-10. This will
fix the conformation not in B but in as a result of A A(1,2)
strain16 between N-benzyl and R-methyl groups, to afford
(-)-11.
Resu lts a n d Discu ssion
First, we examined the preparation of both enant-
iomers of 2-piperidone (1). To obtain 1 in an optically pure
state, we investigated the lipase-mediated kinetic resolu-
tion of (()-1, prepared from the NaBH4 reduction of
â-keto ester (2).13 Kinetic resolution of (()-1 under the
condition of treatment with lipase AK and vinyl acetate
in i-Pr2O proceeded nicely to afford the acetate of (+)-1
in 47% yield (>99% ee) and alcohol (-)-1 in 52% yield
(91% ee), respectively. Hydrolysis of the acetate with K2-
CO3 gave enantiopure (+)-1. The enantiomer (-)-1 was
found to be prepared more effectively from bakers’ yeast
reduction of 2 under nonfermenting conditions14 in high
optical yield (98% ee), and direct recrystallization of the
crude reduction product resulted in obtaining enan-
tiopure (-)-1 in 88% isolated yield (Scheme 1).
(8) Cook, G. R.; Beholz, L. G.; Stille, J . R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994,
35, 1669-1672; J . Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 3575-3584.
(9) Isolation: (a) Khuong-Huu, Q.; Ratle, G.; Monseur, X.; Goutarel,
R. Bull. Soc. Chim. Belg. 1972, 81, 443-458. Nonchiral synthesis: (b)
Paterne, M.; Dhal, R.; Brown, E. Bull. Chem. Soc. J pn. 1989, 62, 1321-
1324.
(10) Isolation: Christofidis, I.; Welter, A.; J adot, J . Tetrahedron
1977, 33, 977-979.
Reduction of (-)-12 with Super-Hydride gave alcohol
(-)-3, an intermediate for the chiral synthesis of (+)-
spectaline.3b,4 Thus, the absolute stereochemistry of (-)-1
was verified to be 2R,3S, and the preparation of a chiral
building block of type I was completed (Scheme 2).
Next, we examined the transformation of (-)-1 to the
other three diastereomers (type II, III, and IV) to
establish the process for the diastereodivergent synthesis
of 2,6-disubstituted 3-piperidinol alkaloids. The trans-
(2,6)-piperidines of types II and III were prepared by
hydride reduction of iminium ions generated from the
corresponding vinylogous urethanes in a highly stereo-
selective manner. Thus, reduction of (+)-10 with NaBH3-
CN in the presence of trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) provided
a 14:1 mixture of trans-(2,6)- and cis-(2,6)-piperidines.
Because it was difficult to isolate the major, desired
trans-(2,6)-piperidine in a pure state, the epimeric mix-
(11) Isolation: ref 7a. Nonchiral stereoselective synthesis: (a)
Natume, M.; Ogawa, M. Heterocycles 1981, 16, 973. Chiral syntheses
of desoxoprosophylline: (b) Saitoh, Y.; Moriyama, Y.; Takahashi, T.;
Khuong-Huu, Q. Tetrahedron Lett. 1980, 75. (c) Saitoh, Y.; Moriyama,
Y.; Hirota, H.; Takahashi, T.; Khuong-Huu, Q. Bull. Chem. Soc. J pn.
1981, 54, 488. (d) Tadano, K.; Takao, K.; Nigawara, Y.; Nishio, E.;
Takagi, I.; Maeda, K.; Ogawa, S. Synlett 1993, 565-567; (e) Tetrahe-
dron 1994, 50, 5681-5704. (f) Kadota, I.; Kawada, M.; Muramatsu,
Y.; Yamamoto, Y. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1997, 8, 3887-3893. (g)
Yang, C.-F.; Xu, Y.-M.; Liao, L.-X.; Zhou, W.-S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998,
39, 9227-9228. (h) Ojima, I.; Vidal, E. S. J . Org. Chem. 1998, 63,
7999-8003.
(12) Isolation: Khuong-Huu, Q.; Ratle, G.; Monseur, X.; Goutarel,
R. Bull. Soc. Chim. Belg. 1972, 81, 425-442. Chiral syntheses of
prosopinine: Hirai, Y.; Watanabe, J .; Nozaki, T.; Yokoyama, H.;
Yamaguchi, S. J . Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 776-777 and ref 9h. Chiral
syntheses of desoxoprosopinine: Ciufolini, M. A.; Hermann, C. W.;
Whitmire, K. H.; Byrne, N. E. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 3473-
3475 and refs 8d and 8e. Yuasa, Y.; Ando, J .; Shibuya, S. Tetrahe-
dron: Asymmetry 1995, 6, 1525-1526; J . Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1
1996, 793-802. Reference 9f. Agami, C.; County, F.; Mathieu, H.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 3505-3508. Agami, C.; County, F.; Lam,
H.; Mathieu, H. Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 8783-8796. Nonchiral stereo-
selective synthesis of desoxoprosopinine: Holmes, A. B.; Thompson,
J .; Baxter, A. J . G.; Dixon, J . J . Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1985,
37-39. Cook, G. R.; Beholz, L. G.; Stille, J . R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994,
35, 1669-1672. Luker, T.; Hiemstra, H.; Speckamp, W. N. J . Org.
Chem. 1997, 62, 3592-3596.
(15) Use of Super-Hydride was extremely effective for reduction of
this sterically hindered ester functional group. For example, no
reduction proceeded with LiAlH4 at room temperature for 14 h, and
the starting material was recovered. Reduction with LiBH4 (6 equiv)
at room temperature for 23 h gave a 1:1 mixture of (-)-4 and (-)-5.
Reduction with DIBAL (2.2 equiv) at 0 °C for 1 h resulted in the
formation of a complex mixture not including the desired alcohol (-)-
5.
(13) Bonjoch, J .; Serret, I.; Bosch, J . Tetrahedron 1984, 40, 2505-
2511.
(14) Seebach, D.; Roggo, S.; Maetzke, T.; Braunschweiger, H.;
Cercus, J .; Krieger, M. Helv. Chim. Acta 1987, 70, 1605-1615.
(16) J ohnson, F. Chem. Rev. 1968, 68, 375-413.