Organometallics 1996, 15, 887-890
887
Syn th esis, Str u ctu r es, a n d Rea ctivity of Bip h en ylylen e
Com p lexes of Bism u th (III)
Claire J . Carmalt,† Alan H. Cowley,*,‡ Andreas Decken,‡,§
Yvonne G. Lawson,† and Nicholas C. Norman*,†
Department of Chemistry, The University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1
7RU, U.K., and Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry, The University of Texas at Austin,
Austin, Texas 78712
Received September 14, 1995X
Sch em e 1
Summary: The synthesis of [Bi2(biph)3] (5) and [PPN]-
[BiCl2(biph)] (6) (biph ) 2,2′-biphenylylene, PPN )
Ph3PdNdPPh3), the first structurally characterized
biphenylylene complexes of bismuth (III), are described.
Complex 5 crystallizes as a THF (tetrahydrofuran)
solvate; each bismuth is three-coordinate with a trigonal
pyramidal geometry. The solid state of 6 comprises
separated [PPN]+ cations and [BiCl2(biph)]- anions. The
anion adopts a trigonal bipyramidal geometry at the
bismuth; the axial sites are occupied by chloride ligands,
and two of the three equatorial sites are occupied by ring
carbon atoms.
In tr od u ction
In a recent series of papers1-4 we have described the
results of a number of crystal structure determinations
for a range of arylbismuth(III) halides and halogeno
anions, from which a number of structural trends have
emerged. In contrast to the structures now known for
aryl- (mostly phenyl) bismuth compounds, however,
there are few structurally characterized examples of
linked aryl or heteroaromatic bismuth derivatives.
Recently, Suzuki et al.5 reported the structure of 10-
((4′-chlorophenyl)ethynyl)phenothiabismin 5,5-dioxide
(1), in which the bismuth center adopts a three-
coordinate, trigonal pyramidal coordination geometry.
However, additional interactions are present between
the bismuth atom and the sulfonyl oxygen atoms. The
structure of a biphenylylene complex of antimony(III),
[SbCl(biph)] (2), has also been described recently.6 In
compound 2, the primary coordination environment of
the antimony atom is trigonal pyramidal, but additional
secondary Sb‚‚‚Cl interactions are also present resulting
in the formation of loosely bound dimers. Biphenylylene
complexes of bismuth(III) have not hitherto been struc-
turally characterized, but analytical data have been
presented for [BiI(biph)]7 and [PhBi(biph)]8 as well as
for the bismuth(V) complex [Ph3Bi(biph)].9 Herein we
report the syntheses of a range of biphenylylene com-
plexes of bismuth(III), two examples of which have been
characterized by X-ray crystallography.
Resu lts a n d Discu ssion
The reaction between BiCl3 and 1 equiv of 2,2′-
dilithiobiphenyl‚TMEDA10 (3) (TMEDA ) N,N,N′,N′-
tetramethylethylenediamine) in Et2O solution afforded,
after workup, a cream colored crystalline solid, analyti-
cal data for which (Table 1) were consistent not with
the expected formula [BiCl(biph)] (4) (biph ) 2,2′-
biphenylylene) but with the formula [Bi2(biph)3] (5). As
indicated in Scheme 1, 5 presumably results either from
the reaction of 4 with 3 or via a redistribution reaction
of 4. Redistribution reactions of this type have been
found to be characteristic of arylbismuth halide com-
pounds in solution.1-4 However, it is also of interest to
note (ref 7) that analytical data have been presented
for the related antimony complex, [Sb2(biph)3], which
results from the reaction of [SbI(biph)] with Li2-
(biphenyl). Moreover, compound 5 was obtained in
higher yield from the stoichiometrically correct reaction
between 2 equiv of BiCl3 and 3 equiv of 3 in Et2O
solution.
† The University of Newcastle upon Tyne.
‡ The University of Texas at Austin.
§ Present address: Chemistry Department, University of New
Brunswick, Bag Service 45222, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada
E3B 6E2.
X Abstract published in Advance ACS Abstracts, December 15, 1995.
(1) Clegg, W.; Errington, R. J .; Fisher, G. A.; Hockless, D. C. R.;
Norman, N. C.; Orpen, A. G.; Stratford, S. E. J . Chem. Soc., Dalton
Trans. 1992, 1967.
(2) Clegg, W.; Errington, R. J .; Fisher, G. A.; Flynn, R. J .; Norman,
N. C. J . Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1993, 637.
(3) Clegg, W.; Elsegood, M. R. J .; Errington, R. J .; Fisher, G. A.;
Norman, N. C. J . Mater. Chem. 1994, 4, 891.
(4) Carmalt, C. J .; Cowley, A. H.; Decken, A.; Norman, N. C. J .
Organomet. Chem. 1995, 496, 59.
(5) Suzuki, H.; Murafuji, T.; Azuma, N. J . Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans.
1992, 1593.
(6) Millington, P. L.; Sowerby, D. B. J . Organomet. Chem. 1994, 480,
227.
(7) Hellwinkel, D.; Bach, M. J . Organomet. Chem. 1969, 17, 389.
(8) Wittig, G.; Hellwinkel, D. Chem. Ber. 1964, 97, 789.
(9) Hellwinkel, D.; Bach, M. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1968, 720, 198.
(10) Neugebauer, W.; Kos, A. J .; Schleyer, P. v. R. J . Organomet.
Chem. 1982, 228, 107.
0276-7333/96/2315-0887$12.00/0 © 1996 American Chemical Society