Communications to the Editor
J ournal of Medicinal Chemistry, 1996, Vol. 39, No. 2 345
Ta ble 1. Inhibition of AMPA Currents in Rat Cortical Cells
Stimulated with 50 µM Kainic Acid
reported to be active in in vivo electrical seizure
models.19 1,2-Dihydrophthalazine 16d was tested in the
maximum electroshock (MES) test in mice. The ED50
was determined to be 30 mg/kg (ip dose). The results
clearly indicate that 16d penetrates the blood-brain
barrier and inhibits the onset of electrically stimulated
seizure activity.20
In summary, novel heterocycles consisting of a 1,2-
dihydrophthalazine core have been shown to selectively
and noncompetitively inhibit currents associated with
activation of the AMPA subtype of the glutamate
receptor. The activity of the most potent compound, 16e
(SYM 2207), was similar to the literature value reported
for GYKI 53655 (2,3-benzodiazepine, 8) in the same
electrophysiology assay. Unlike 8, the 1,2-dihydro-
phthalazine 16d was shown to be inactive at the central
benzodiazepine binding site. Furthermore, 16d was
active in an in vivo anticonvulsant assay. The potent
and selective activity of the 1,2-dihydrophthalazines
coupled with their relative ease of synthesis and im-
proved solubility properties should make them valuable
tools for the pharmacological study of glutamate recep-
tors. Further structure activity and in vivo studies are
in progress.
% inhibn at
10 µM (100 µM)
no.a
R′
IC50b((SE)
12
(38)
13(88)
55
45
77
89
70
79
16a
16b
16c
16d
16e
16f
18
CH3
C2H5
i-C3H7
n-C3H7
n-C4H9
t-C4H9
23(5.9)
7.2(0.7)
2.8(0.4)
1.8(0.2)
5.4(1.5)
16g
7
5
C6H5
(35)
51
10(0.8)
0.14
98c
a
b
Compounds 16a -g and 18 are racemic mixtures. IC50 (µM)
values represent an average of at least four cells. c Percent
inhibition at 3 µM.
at 100 µM (<40% inhibition). When 12 was converted
to the 1,2-dihydrophthalazines 16a -f (racemic mix-
tures), a dramatic increase in AMPA receptor inhibition
was observed (Table 1). Antagonism increased with the
length of the pendant alkyl chain. The trend is appar-
ent for dihydrophthalazines with pendant groups bear-
ing normal alkyl functionality (IC50’s of 23, 7.2, 2.8, and
1.8 µM for R ) methyl, ethyl, n-propyl, and n-butyl,
respectively), a pattern that contrasts with the data
reported for the 2,3-benzodiazepine analogues.15 Par-
ticularly notable is dihydrophthalazine 16e (SYM 2207)
which had an IC50 value of 1.8 µM and was similar to
the literature value of the most potent noncompetitive
AMPA antagonist GYKI 53655 (8, IC50 ) 1.0 µM).10b
Size limitations of the side chain are evident with the
phenyl derivative 16g (35% inhibition at 100 µM).
Interestingly, the thio derivative 18 showed approxi-
mately the same level of activity as its oxygenated
counterpart 16d (79% inhibition at 10 µM for 18 vs 77%
inhibition at 10 µM for 16d ).
Numerous ligands for the AMPA receptor show activ-
ity at the kainate receptor subtype as well.16 In order
to define a selectivity profile for the dihydrophthalazines
(AMPA vs kainate receptor activity), selected com-
pounds were tested in the voltage-clamp assay for
modulation of kainate receptor currents. Human em-
bryonic kidney (HEK) cells were used to express the
GluR6 receptor.17 This homomeric ligand gated ion
channel is known to have properties similar to the
native kainate receptor.17 When 16b and 16d were
tested for inhibition of GluR6 currents, neither com-
pound showed greater than 10% inhibition at a concen-
tration of 100 µM (data not shown).
Further selectivity data was obtained by screening
compounds 16d and 8 for their ability to displace
tritiated ligands in a variety of binding assays.18 Di-
hydrophthalazine 16d showed very weak binding in a
nonselective adenosine assay (32% inhibition at 10 µM)
while displaying no binding in all others tested (<10%
inhibition of tritiated ligand binding at 10 µM). The
2,3-benzodiazepine 8, however, showed approximately
62% inhibition of binding (at 10 µM) to the central
benzodiazepine receptor while remaining relatively
inactive at the other receptors assayed (data not shown).
None of the compounds bound competitively to glutamate
receptors (NMDA, AMPA, kainate, and strychnine-
insensitive glycine assays).
Su p p or tin g In for m a tion Ava ila ble: Experimental de-
tails with spectral data (6 pages). Ordering information is
available on any current masthead page.
Refer en ces
(1) Hicks, T. P. The Role of Glutamate and its Receptors In Synaptic
Transmission. In CNS Neurotransmitters and Neuromodula-
tors: Glutamate; Stone, T. W., Ed.; CRC Press, Inc.: New York,
1995; pp 201-215.
(2) (a) Lipton, S. A.; Rosenberg, P. A. Excitatory Amino Acids as a
Final Common Pathway for Neurologic Disorders. N. Engl. J .
Med. 1994, 330, 613-622. (b) Ikonomidou, C.; Turski, L.
Glutamate in Neurodegenerative Disorders. In CNS Neurotrans-
mitters and Neuromodulators: Glutamate; Stone, T. W., Ed.;
CRC Press, Inc.: New York, 1995; pp 253-266. (c) Szatkowski,
M.; Attwell, D. Triggering and Execution of Neuronal Death in
Brain Ischemia: Two Phases of Glutamate Release by Different
Mechanisms. Trends Neurosci. 1994, 17, 359-365.
(3) (a) Meldrum, B. S. Neuroprotection by NMDA and Non-NMDA
Glutamate Antagonists. In Direct and Allosteric Control of
Glutamate Receptors; Palfreyman, M. G., Reynolds, I. J., Skolnick,
P., Eds.; CRC Press, Inc.: New York, 1994; pp 127-135. (b)
Ginsberg, M. D. Neuroprotection in Brain Ischemia: An Update
(part 1). Neuroscientist 1995, 1, 95-103. (c) Meldrum, B. Possible
Therapeutic Applications of Antagonists of Excitatory Amino
Acid Neurotransmitters. Clin. Sci. 1985, 68, 113-122. (d)
Rogawski, M. A. Therapeutic Potential of Excitatory Amino Acid
Antagonists: Channel Blockers and 2,3-Benzodiazepines. Trends
Pharmacol. Sci. 1993, 14, 325-331. (e) McBurney, R. N.
Therapeutic Potential of NMDA Antagonists in Neurodegen-
erative Diseases. Neurobiol. Aging 1994, 15, 271-273.
(4) (a) Witkin, J . M. Role of NMDA Receptors in Behavior and
Behavioral Effects of Drugs. In CNS Neurotransmitters and
Neuromodulators: Glutamate; Stone, T. W., Ed.; CRC Press,
Inc.: New York, 1995; pp 323-340. (b) Lalonde, R. Behavioral
Effects of Non-NMDA Glutamate Receptor Antagonists. Ibid.;
pp 351-357. (c) Moore, K. W.; Leeson, P. D.; Carling, R. W.;
Tricklebank, M. D.; Singh, L. Anticonvulsant Activity of Glycine-
Site NMDA Antagonists. 1. 2-Carboxyl Prodrugs of 5,7-Dichlo-
rokynurenic Acid. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1993, 3, 61-64. (d)
Salituro, F. G.; Tomlinson, R. C.; Baron, B. M.; Palfreyman, M.
G.; McDonald, I. A.; Schmidt, W.; Wu, H.-Q.; Guidetti, P.;
Schwarcz, R. Enzyme-Activated Antagonists of the Strychnine-
Insensitive Glycine/NMDA Receptor. J . Med. Chem. 1994, 37,
334-336.
(5) Harris, E. W. Subtypes of Glutamate Receptors: Pharmacologi-
cal Characterization. In CNS Neurotransmitters and Neuro-
modulators: Glutamate; Stone, T. W., Ed.; CRC Press, Inc.: New
York, 1995; pp 95-114.
(6) Watkins, J . C.; Evans, R. H. Excitatory Amino Acid Transmit-
ters. A. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 1981, 21, 165-204.
(7) Krogsgaard-Larsen, P.; Nielsen, E. O.; Curtis, D. R. Ibotenic Acid
Analogues. Synthesis and Biological and In Vitro Activity of
Conformationally Restricted Agonists at Central Excitatory
Amino Acid Receptors. J . Med. Chem. 1984, 27, 585-591.
Both competitive and noncompetitive AMPA antago-
nists such as NBQX and GYKI 52466 have been