Organic Letters
Letter
a
with stoichiometric VOCl3 was also utilized in the formation of
N-(ethoxycarbonyl)-2-hydroxynorsalutaridine,17 an analogue
of salutaridine (B, Figure 1), a key intermediate in the
biosynthesis of morphine. In addition to V(V), phenol-dienone
products have been prepared directly from tethered free
phenols using stoichiometric Fe(III)18,19 or Tl(III)20,21 as the
oxidant. Despite success with these stoichiometric reagents,
limitations include the air sensitivity of VOCl3, the toxicity of
Tl(III), the need for a significant excess of oxidant, and
reduced yields in converting electron-neutral and electron-
deficient substrates. A catalytic variant of this direct trans-
formation using stable, easily accessible reagents would
therefore be of great utility from the perspective of atom
economy and accessing structurally diverse phenol-dienone
substrates.
An alternative approach for the formation of phenol-dienone
products proceeds via oxidation of the corresponding tethered
aryl ethers or mixed phenol/ether species, followed by
subsequent deprotection. Considerable work in this area has
shown that stoichiometric Mo(V)22 and I(III)23 are competent
in the intramolecular oxidative coupling of tethered aryl ethers.
The stoichiometric nature of the I(III)-mediated trans-
formation was addressed by Kita et al. in 2008, as they
coupled mixed tethered phenol/ethers with catalytic amounts
of aryl iodide, which is activated to I(III) by H2O2 in the
presence of trifluoroacetic acid (Scheme 1b).24 A comple-
mentary approach was also disclosed by Wang et al., wherein
they oxidized similar substrates using a catalytic system of
sodium nitrite in the presence of air and Brønsted acid
(Scheme 1c).25 While both of these reports reflect catalytic
variants of the intramolecular coupling of tethered arenes, both
require the use of electron-rich substrates. Additionally, both
approaches utilize mixed tethered phenol/ether substrates,
which precludes the direct formation of the phenol-dienone
motif. Deprotection of aryl ethers to generate the phenol-
dienones can be challenging in the presence of the newly
formed dienone motif, which is sensitive to acidic and reducing
conditions. The orthogonality of protecting groups also
becomes a challenge when multiple ether moieties are present
in the ether-dienone product.
Table 1. Optimization of Reaction Conditions
b
entry
X
loading (mol %)
time (h)
2a (%)
c
1
OEt
OEt
OEt
OEt
Ot-Bu
F
OCH(CF3)2
OCH(CF3)2
OCH(CF3)2
20
20
20
10
10
10
10
10
5
24
24
48
18
18
18
18
24
24
<5
56
(89)
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
d
24
12
<5
70
d
(80)
31
a
Reaction conditions: 1a (0.10 mmol), V (10−20 mol %), HFIP (0.1
b
M), O2 (1 atm) for 18−48 h. Determined by 1H NMR spectroscopy
c
with an internal standard (4,4′-di-tert-butylbiphenyl). DCE as the
d
solvent. Isolated yield.
1,1,1,3,3,3-Hexafluoroisopropanol (HFIP) was identified as a
suitable solvent for this reaction because of its unique ability to
stabilize electron-deficient reaction intermediates.27 The
reaction in HFIP showed good conversion to 2a over 24 h
(Table 1, entry 2), with full conversion observed in 48 h
affording an isolated yield of 89% (Table 1, entry 3).
Interestingly, only para−para coupled products were observed
in this reaction, despite the fact that prior work with this
catalyst uncovered a preference for ortho coupling.12 We
hypothesize that the ortho−para coupled product is not formed
because of unfavorable steric interactions between phenoxy-
bound vanadium and the other aryl partner during the C−C
bond-forming step.
Efforts to reduce reaction time and catalyst loading focused
on the catalyst counterion. Vanadium Schiff base catalysts
bearing the tert-butoxy and fluoride counterions were shown to
form product more slowly over 18 h than the corresponding
ethoxy catalyst over the same time period (Table 1, entries 5
and 6 vs entry 4). The observation that catalyst activity tracks
with the lability of the counterion led to the preparation of a
catalyst bearing HFIP as the counterion. Gratifyingly, V2
proved to be more effective in the transformation, forming 2a
in 70% yield over the same reaction time (Table 1, entry 7).
Reaction for a full 24 h with 10 mol % V2 led to full conversion
of 1a and an 80% isolated yield of 2a (Table 1, entry 8). A
reaction profile for the conversion of 1a to 2a with V2 (see the
order decomposition through 90% conversion with neither a
significant burst nor a significant induction period. Independ-
ent experiments in which 2a was added in variable amounts
prior to reaction of 1a indicate that no product inhibition is
occurring, because 1a is converted to the same extent with
various excesses of 2a. Even so, further reduction of the
catalyst loading led to poor conversion over the 24 h reaction
period (Table 1, entry 9). A screen of solvents (Table S2) and
standard oxidants (Table S3) revealed that HFIP was the
optimal solvent for the transformation and that O2 is the most
An important distinction should be made among bis-ether,
mixed ether/phenol, and bisphenol intramolecular coupling
reactions. These transformations are fundamentally different
and are proposed to proceed via different mechanisms. In the
case of ether systems, a polar, two-electron mechanism
invoking a cationic intermediate is often proposed. In the
case of tethered bisphenol cyclizations to form phenol-dienone
products, the reaction is more likely to proceed through
sequential single-electron oxidation of both coupling partners,
akin to the mechanisms proposed in the biosynthesis of
phenol-derived polycyclic natural products. To the best of our
knowledge, there have been no reports detailing the catalytic
oxidation of tethered free phenols for the formation of phenol-
dienone products.
Inspired by the work of Schwartz16,17 and our prior work
with vanadium Schiff base catalysts,12,26 we envisioned the
development of a catalytic system for the oxidation of tethered
free phenols to form phenol-dienone products directly
(Scheme 1d). Initial reaction studies were conducted with
substrate 1a, 20 mol % vanadium catalyst V1, and O2 as the co-
oxidant (Table 1). When 1,2-dichloroethane (DCE) was
utilized as the solvent, there was little consumption of 1a and
the catalyst system failed to form 2a (Table 1, entry 1).
B
Org. Lett. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX