Many synthetic routes involving the pyrrolic unit require the
controlled introduction of substituents via electrophilic substitu-
tion.11 Success in this regard relies upon successful direction
of incoming substituents and the ability to control the extent of
reactivity. Such control has most commonly been achieved by
the use of carboxylates at the 2-position which serve to both
protect the pyrrolic unit, through their electron-withdrawing
ability and formal carbamate character through resonance, and
direct electrophilic substitution.4,12 Although much practiced,
removal of a carboxy moiety from the 2-position of pyrroles is
often difficult and requires harsh conditions. In addressing the
limitations of carboxylates as protecting groups for pyrroles,
electron-rich sulfenyl groups have recently been demonstrated13
to block the pyrrolic 2-position and activate, rather than protect,
the pyrrolic ring. A variety of sulfenyl groups were investigated
(Figure 1, R ) CH3, CH2CH3, (CH2)9, Ph), and the utility of
the activated pyrroles in acylation reactions was established, as
well as the removal of the sulfenyl group using Raney nickel.
The realization that only blocking/masking the 2-position is
necessary, rather than electronically protecting the N atom
through the traditional use of electron-withdrawing groups, has
highlighted the fact that synthetic pyrrole chemistry, although
aged, is far from mastered.
Comparison of Benzene, Nitrobenzene, and
Dinitrobenzene 2-Arylsulfenylpyrroles
Jose R. Garabatos-Perera, Benjamin H. Rotstein, and
Alison Thompson*
Department of Chemistry, Dalhousie UniVersity, Halifax,
NoVa Scotia B3H 4J3, Canada
ReceiVed March 8, 2007
The effectiveness of the 2,4-dinitrobenzenesulfenyl and
4-nitrobenzenesulfenyl groups as masking and directing
groups at the 2-position of pyrrole has been investigated and
compared to that of 2-phenylthiopyrrole. The presence of
the nitro group(s) enhances stability of the corresponding
pyrrole toward acid and does not significantly decrease the
ability of the pyrrolic unit to undergo electrophilic aromatic
substitution reactions in the form of formylation, nitration,
and condensation with aldehydes. The synthetic utility of
2-(2,4-dinitrobenzenesulfenyl)pyrrole was demonstrated
through the synthesis of meso-substituted dipyrromethanes.
The sulfoxides 2-(2,4-dinitrobenzenesulfinyl)pyrrole and
2-(4-nitrobenzenesulfinyl)pyrrole underwent neither formy-
lation nor nitration, and the increasing presence of nitro
groups within the moiety at the 2-position resulted in
decreased stability under acidic conditions.
FIGURE 1. 2-(Arylsulfenyl)pyrroles.
We previously reported on the effectiveness of 2,4-dini-
trobenzenesulfinyl and 2,4-dinitrobenzenesulfonyl units at the
2-position of pyrrole and demonstrated the removal of these
substituents under mild deprotection conditions.14 Following
Lindsey’s report concerning the activation and masking of
pyrroles using 2-sulfenyl groups, we herein report the reactivity
of 2 and 3, pyrroles substituted at the 2-position by nitroben-
zenesulfenyl groups. The nitro groups, although electron-
withdrawing, do not significantly reduce the reactivity of
pyrroles 2 and 3 compared to that of 1 and are found to impart
stability in air and acid, as well as to increase crystallinity.
The reactivity of pyrroles 1-3 under Vilsmeier-Haack
formylation12 conditions was investigated to determine the
Pyrrolic molecules exhibit a wide variety of electronic and
optical properties, and the pyrrolic unit is essential within the
synthesis of many natural products, new materials, and improved
pharmaceuticals.1-5 As such, the preparation and manipulation
of functionalized pyrroles is of increasing importance.1,6-10
(7) Fu¨rstner, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 3582-3603.
(8) D’Alessio, R.; Bargiotti, A.; Carlini, O.; Colotta, F.; Ferrari, M.;
Gnocchi, P.; Isetta, A. M.; Mongelli, N.; Motta, P.; Rossi, A.; Rossi, M.;
Tibolla, M.; Vanotti, E. J. Med. Chem. 2000, 43, 2557-2565.
(9) O’Hagen, D. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2000, 17, 435-446.
(1) Sternberg, E. D.; Dolphin, D.; Bru¨ckner, C. Tetrahedron 1998, 54,
4151-4202.
(2) Taylor, E. C., Jones, R. A., Eds. Pyrroles; John Wiley & Sons: New
York, 1990.
(3) Ketcha, D. M. Progress in Heterocyclic Chemistry; Gribble, G. W.,
Gilchrist, T. L., Eds.; Pergamon Press: New York, 2001; Vol. 13.
(4) Jones, A. R., Bean, G. P., Eds. The Chemistry of Pyrroles; Academic
Press: London, 1977.
(5) Ferreira, V. F.; de Souza, M. C. B. V.; Cunha, A. C.; Pereira, L. O.
R.; Ferreira, M. L. G. Org. Prep. Proced. Int. 2001, 33, 411-454.
(6) Melvin, M. S.; Tomlinson, J. T.; Saluta, G. R.; Kucera, G. L.;
Lindquist, N.; Manderville, R. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 6333-
6334.
(10) Sato, A.; McNulty, L.; Cox, K.; Kim, S.; Scott, A.; Daniell, K.;
Summerville, K.; Price, C.; Hudson, S.; Kiakos, K.; Hartley, J. A.; Asao,
T.; Lee, M. J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 3903-3918.
(11) Jolicoeur, B.; Chapman, E. E.; Thompson, A.; Lubell, W. D.
Tetrahedron 2006, 62, 11531-11563.
(12) Paine, J. B., III. In The Porphyrins; Dolphin, D., Ed.; Academic
Press: London, 1978; Vol. I, Chapter 4.
(13) Thamyongkit, P.; Bhise, A. D.; Taniguchi, M.; Lindsey, J. S. J.
Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 903-910.
(14) Thompson, A.; Butler, R. J.; Grundy, M. N.; Laltoo, A. B. E.;
Robertson, K. N.; Cameron, T. S. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 3753-3756.
10.1021/jo070493r CCC: $37.00 © 2007 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 08/18/2007
7382
J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 7382-7385