6758
J . Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 6758-6759
one8 ) showing a prochiral dienone moiety, upon reaction
with organoaluminum reagents. We find that exclusive
1,4-addition proceeds without other metal catalysts in
good yields and mild conditions. The reaction occurs from
the face containing the OH with a total π-facial diaste-
reoselectivity and an effective desymmetrization of the
dienone moiety allowing the simultaneous generation of
two stereogenic centers.
Dia ster eoselective Un ca ta lyzed Con ju ga te
Ad d ition of Or ga n oa lu m in u m Rea gen ts:
Efficien t Desym m etr iza tion of
(R)-[(p-Tolylsu lfin yl)m eth yl]qu in ols
M. Carmen Carren˜o,* Manuel Pe´rez Gonza´lez, and
Mar´ıa Ribagorda
Departamento de Qu´ımica Orga´nica (C-I), Universidad
Auto´noma, Cantoblanco, 28049 Madrid, Spain
The results of reactions with a number of organoalu-
minum reagents are summarized in Table 1. We found
that better yields were obtained when 1 or 2 was added
J ean Fischer
over an excess of AlR2R3 (4 equiv). All reactions run in
2
CH2Cl2 led to compounds 3 and 4 resulting from the
exclusive 1,4-conjugate addition. Both 1 and 2 (a â,â-
disubstituted enone) behaved similarly toward trialkyl-
(Table 1, entries 1, 2, 6, and 7), alkinyl- (Table 1, entries
3, 4, 8, and 9), or vinylalanes (Table 1, entries 5 and 10),
giving rise to only one out of the four possible diastere-
omers in good yields. The unambiguous stereochemical
assignment of 3 and 4 was established on the basis of a
Laboratoire de Cristallochimie, UA 424, Universite´ Louis
Pasteur, 67070-Strasbourg, France
Received J une 17, 1996
The development of efficient enantioselective 1,4-
conjugate addition reactions has focused the interest of
several research groups in the past two decades. High
asymmetric inductions have been achieved by using
chiral electrophiles, nucleophiles, and to a lesser extent,
chiral catalysts.1 A number of reports demonstrated that
a sulfoxide on either the acceptor2 or the nucleophile3 can
efficiently control the diastereofacial selectivity of the
conjugate addition. To our knowledge, no reports dealing
with δ-sulfinyl-R,â-unsaturated carbonyl systems have
been published so far.
In the course of our investigations devoted to the use
of sulfoxides in asymmetric synthesis,4 we found that
DIBAL5 or alkylalanes6 reacted in a highly diastereose-
lective manner with â-keto sulfoxides. Thus, matching
sulfoxides with aluminum derivatives seemed to be
highly efficient in asymmetric reactions. Seeking to
further exploit this combination, we thought of conjugate
additions.
1
detailed H-NMR study and confirmed by X-ray diffrac-
tion of 4b.9
The high reactivity here reported is surprising because
such an easy reaction had only been found in a few cases
for simple alanes10 or in the presence of some transition
metals.11 In the absence of any other metal, the 1,4-
transfer was only possible via a free-radical process12 or
by using dialkylaluminum halides.13 In our case, we
could disregard a free-radical process based on a control
experiment in the presence of the radical scavenger
galvinoxyl with 1 and AlMe3. Even more remarkable are
the stereospecificity and the effective diastereotopic CdC
bond selection observed. A similar diastereoselective
process on p-quinols directed by the OH was found in
Recently, we synthesized (R)-4-hydroxy-4-[(p-tolylsulfi-
nyl)methyl]-2,5-cyclohexadienone (1)7 and observed an
intriguing diastereotopic CdC group selection for its
Diels-Alder cycloadditions. In the present work, we
investigate the behavior of p-quinols 1 and 2 (prepared
from 4,4-dimethoxy-2,6-dimethyl-2,5-cyclohexadien-1-
(8) Pelter, A.; Elgendy, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1988, 29, 677.
(9) Crystal data for 4b revealed the associated structure shown:
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail:
carreno@ccuam3.sdi.uam.es.
(1) Reviews: (a) Schmalz, H. G. in Comprehensive Organic Synthe-
sis; Trost, B. M., Fleming, I, Eds.; Pergamon: Oxford, 1991; Vol. 4,
Chapter 1.5. (b) Rossiter, B. E.; Swingle, N. M. Chem. Rev. 1992, 92,
771. (c) Perlmutter, P. Conjugate Addition Reactions in Organic
Synthesis; Pergamon Press: Oxford, 1992. For recent references see:
(d) Urban, E.; Knu¨hl, G.; Helmchen, G. Tetrahedron 1996, 52, 971. (e)
Enders, D.; Kirchhoff, J .; Mannes, D.; Raabe, G. Synthesis 1995, 659.
(2) Review: Posner, G. H. In The Chemistry of Sulfones and
Sulfoxide; Patai, S., Rappoport, Z., Stirling, C. J . M., Eds.; J ohn Wiley
& Sons: New York, 1988; Chapter 16.
(3) (a) Review: Hua, H. D. In Advances in Carbanion Chemistry;
Snieckus, V., Ed.; J AI Press: London, 1992; Vol. 1, p 249. (b) Haynes,
R. K.; Katsifis, A. G.; Vowiller, S. C.; Hambley, T. W. J . Am. Chem.
Soc. 1988, 110, 5423. (c) Marco, J . L.; Ferna´ndez, I.; Khiar, N.;
Ferna´ndez, P.; Romero, A. J . Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 6678.
(4) For an overview of our work see: (a) Carren˜o, M. C. Chem. Rev.
1995, 95, 1717. (b) Solladie´, G.; Carren˜o, M. C. Organosulphur
Chemistry: Synthetic Aspects; Page, P. C. B.,Ed.; Academic Press: New
York, 1995; Chapter 1.
(5) (a) Carren˜o, M. C.; Garc´ıa Ruano, J . L.; Mart´ın, A. M.; Pedregal,
C.; Rodr´ıguez, J . H.; Rubio, A.; Sa´nchez, J .; Solladie´, G. J . Org. Chem.
1990, 55, 2120. (b) Bueno, A. B.; Carren˜o, M. C.; Garc´ıa Ruano, J . L.;
Pen˜a, B.; Rubio, A.; Hoyos, M. A. Tetrahedron 1994, 50, 9355.
(6) Carren˜o, M. C.; Garc´ıa Ruano, J . L.; Maestro, M. C.; Pe´rez
Gonza´lez, M. Tetrahedron 1993, 49, 11009. Bueno, A. B.; Carren˜o, M.
C.; Garc´ıa Ruano, J . L. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 3737. Et2AlCN also
produced cyanhidrines diastereoselectively; see: Escribano, A. M.;
Garc´ıa Ruano, J . L.; Mart´ın-Castro, A. M.; Rodr´ıguez, J . H. Tetrahedron
1994, 50, 7567.
This hydrogen bonding association should be maintained in solution
to account for the low chemical shift observed for the CH3 of the ethyl
substituent (δ ) 0.78 ppm) as a consequence of the anisotropic effect
exerted by the spatially close aromatic ring. A similar effect could be
observed in the proton or methyl group situated on the pro-R double
bond of p-quinols 1 and 2.
(10) (a) Pappo, R.; Collins, P. W. Tetrahedron Lett. 1972, 2627. (b)
Collins, P. W.; Dajani, E. Z.; Bruhn, M. S.; Brown, C. H.; Palmer, J .
R.; Pappo, R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1975, 4217. Hooz, J .; Layton, R. B. J .
Am. Chem. Soc. 1971, 93, 7320.
(11) For recent references see: (a) Flemming, S.; Kabbara, J .;
Nickisch, K.; Neh, H.; Westermann, J . Synthesis 1995, 317. (b)
Kabbara, J .; Flemming, S.; Nickisch, K.; Neh, H.; Westermann, J .
Tetrahedron 1995, 51, 743. (b) Westermann, J .; Nickisch, K. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1993, 32, 1368.
(12) Kabalka, G. W.; Daley, R. F. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1973, 95, 4428.
(13) (a) Ashby, E. C.; Noding, S. A. J . Org. Chem. 1979, 44, 4792.
(b) Ru¨ck, K.; Kunz, H. Synlett 1992, 343. (c) Ru¨ck, K.; Kunz, H. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1991, 30, 694.
(7) Carren˜o, M. C.; Pe´rez Gonza´lez, M.; Fischer, J . Tetrahedron Lett.
1995, 36, 4893.
S0022-3263(96)01126-7 CCC: $12.00 © 1996 American Chemical Society