Table 1 Conversion of ketones to gem-bis(difluoramines)
Entry
Ketone (A)
gem-Bis(difluoramine) (B)
Yield (%)
Ref.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Acetone (4)
2,2-Bis(difluoramino)propane (12)
1,1-Bis(difluoramino)cyclopentane (13)
1,1-Bis(difluoramino)cyclohexane (14)
1,1,4,4-Tetrakis(difluoramino)cyclohexane (15)
90
80
80
85
4a
4a
4a
4a
14
—
—
—
—
—
—
Cyclopentanone (5)
Cyclohexanone (6)
Cyclohexa-1,4-dione (7)
N-Acetylpiperidinone (8)
9a (n = 1)
9b (n = 9)
9c (n = 10)
4,4-Bis(difluoramino)-N-acetylpiperidine (16)
85
ab
17a
17b
17c
18
20a
20b
80b
85b
90b
0c
9
10
11
10
11a (R = H)
11b (R = CH3)
0c
a Decomposition upon work-up; b Analytical data provided in the ESI†; c Only formation of the cage-systems 19a (19b) in ca. 80% yield was observed.
oxide or distillation, respectively. The given yields are based on
1H NMR data of the crude product containing only the gem-
bis(difluoramine) (B) and triphenylmethanol. A variety of
known (entries 1–5) as well as new (entries 6–11) difluoramine
derivatives was prepared in good to excellent yields (Table
1).
nism, find alternative preparations of the reagent, and synthe-
size potential high-energy materials.
We gratefully acknowledge the financial support by the
Office of Naval Research (Program Manager: Dr Judah
Goldwasser), the Air Force Office of Scientific Research and
the National Science Foundation.
CAUTION: gem-Bis(difluoramines) are potentially shock-
sensitive and thermolabile. They should be handled with care!
Notes and references
‡ Crystal data: the data were collected on a Bruker 3-circle platform
diffractometer equipped with a SMART CCD detector with the c-axis fixed
at 54.74° from a fine-focus tube and an LT-3 apparatus for low temperature
data collection: 3, C19H15F2N, Mr = 295.32, monoclinic, a = 10.3882(12),
b = 9.8259(11), c = 14.6065(16) Å, b = 92.402(2)°, V = 1489.6(3) Å3,
T = 213(2) K, space group P21/n, Z = 4, Dc = 1.317 Mg m23, m(Mo-Ka)
= 0.094 mm21, 9649 reflections mesuared, 3035 unique (Rint = 0.0321).
The final wR2 was 0.1098 (all data). CCDC reference number 188416. See
CIF or other electronic format.
1 W. Hanefeld, N,N-Dihalogen-amine, ed. D. Klaman in Methoden der
Organischen Chemie (Houben-Weyl) Nitrogen Compounds, Vol. E16a/
Part 2, Georg-Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart, New York, 1990, pp. 893–925
and references therein.
2 (a) R. D. Chapman, M. F. Welker and C. B. Kreutzberger, J. Org.
Chem., 1998, 63, 1566; (b) R. D. Chapman, R. D. Gilardi, M. F. Welker
and C. B. Kreutzberger, J. Org. Chem., 1999, 64, 960.
3 T. Axenrod, X.-P. Guan, J. Sun, L. Qi, R. D. Chapman and R. D. Gilardi,
Tetrahedron Lett., 2001, 42, 2621.
4 (a) K. Baum, J. Amer. Chem. Soc., 1968, 90, 7083; (b) W. H. Graham
and J. P. Freeman, J. Org. Chem., 1969, 34, 2589; (c) A. V. Fokin, Y.
M. Kosyrev, V. A. Makarov and N. P. Novoselov, Dokl. Akad. Nauk
SSSR, 1969, 186, 112.
5 E. W. Lawless and I. C. Smith, Inorganic High Energy Oxidizers
(Synthesis, Structure and Properties), Marcel Dekker Inc., New York,
NY, USA, 1968, p. 69.
6 J. P. Freeman, A. Kennedy and C. B. Colburn, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1960,
82, 5304.
7 (a) V. Grakauskas and K. Baum, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1970, 92, 2096; (b)
R. E. Banks, R. N. Hazeldine and J. P. Lalu, J. Chem. Soc. C, 1966,
1514.
8 (a) V. Grakauskas and K. Baum, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1969, 91, 1679; (b)
J. M. J. Lambert and G. M. Alain, (Societe Nationale des Poudres et
Explosives), 1973, DE 2320119; (c) D. L. Klapotek and G. B. Hobrock,
Inorg. Chem., 1967, 6, 1751.
9 (a) R. C. Petry and J. P. Freeman, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1961, 83, 3912; (b)
W. H. Graham and C. O. Parker, J. Org. Chem., 1963, 28, 850.
10 J. R. Surles, C. I. Bumgardner and J. Bordner, J. Fluorine Chem., 1975,
5, 467.
Although 17a could not yet be isolated on this small scale, it
represents the smallest alicyclic geminal bis(difluoramine) so
far characterized. The bisketone 11a (11b) could only be
converted to the bridged hemiaminal 19a (19b); neither a larger
excess of 3 nor extended reaction time furnished the tetrakis(di-
fluoramine) 20a (20b).
Mechanistically, the reactions involve cleavage of 3 to the
triphenylmethyl cation and difluoramine. The latter or the in situ
product, difluorsulfamic acid, reacts with the ketone A to
provide gem-bis(difluoramine) B. It is noteworthy that our
reaction did not proceed in conc. H2SO4, although acidolysis of
3 was observed spectroscopically: the 19F NMR signal of 3
disappeared and the trityl cation was observed in the 13C NMR
spectrum. Also employing other strong acids such as FSO3H,
CF3CO2H, CF3SO3H or CF3SO3H/(CF3SO2)2O resulted in
similar behavior. In the case of FSO3H/SbF5 only decomposi-
tion of 3 was observed. We have never been able to observe free
or protonated difluoramine.12 It is also possible that under the
reaction conditions SO3 in oleum—besides being a water
scavanger – might react with 3 to form F2NSO3H as the ultimate
difluoraminating reagent (vide supra). The triphenylmethyl
cation might also act like a Lewis acid catalyst, polarizing the
carbonyl group (Mukayama type activation13).
In conclusion, the readily preparable, stable triphenylme-
thyldifluoramine (3) can be conveniently employed for the
efficient conversion of ketones (A) under mild reaction
conditions to the respective geminal bis(difluoramines) (B).
This is the first difluoramination methodology that avoids the
use of neat HNF2 and therefore minimizes its potential hazards.
Work is underway to further investigate the reaction mecha-
11 C. Gidwell and G. Furgeson, Acta Crystallogr., Sect. C, 1994, 50,
924.
12 K. O. Christe, Inorg. Chem., 1975, 14, 2821.
13 S. Kobayashi, M. Murakami and T. Mukaiyama, Chem. Lett., 1985,
1535.
14 J. Zhang, J. Oxley, J. Smith, C. Bedford and R. Chapman, J. Mass
Spectrom., 2000, 35, 841.
CHEM. COMMUN., 2002, 1712–1713
1713