minum reagent for C-glycosylation of glycosyl fluorides.6
Alkylaluminum reagents were employed by Maruoka et al.
for the selective alkylation of fluorinated epoxides and
carbonyl compounds.7 Organoaluminum reagents also serve
as catalysts in the nucleophilic substitution of tertiary alkyl
fluorides.8 On the basis of these facts, we examined the
reaction of 2-fluoro-2-trifluoromethyl-3-tosylmethyl-4-pen-
tanolide (3l) with dimethyaluminum anilide. To our great
delight, the expected 2-phenylamino-2-trifluoromethyl-4-
pentanolide (2a) was formed (Scheme 1). However, it was
N-Benzyl-4-hydroxy-2-fluoro-3-tosylmethyl-2-(trifluoro-
methyl)pentanamide (1b) was treated with various organo-
metallic compounds (2.0-2.2 molar equiv), and it was found
that n-butyllithium, triethylborane, n-butyltitanium triiso-
propoxide, diethylzinc and ethylmagnesium bromide did not
give 2b at all. In contrast, some organoaluminum reagents
effectively formed 2b from 1b. On treatment with aluminum
trialkoxide such as Al(OPh)3 and Al(Oi-Pr)3 in refluxing
THF, 3l was formed together with the unchanged 1b. Among
the alkylaluminum reagents examined herein, trimethyl-
aluminum and diisobutylaluminum hydride (DIBAL-H) were
the most effective at giving 2b, affording the latter in 68%
and 77% yields, respectively. It is worth noting that the
product (2b) was formed as a single diastereomer.
Scheme 1. Formation of 2a from 3l Subjected to Reaction
with Dimethylaluminum Anilide
From these preliminary experiments, we selected two
aluminum reagents, trimethylaluminum and DIBAL-H, and
they were subjected to the reaction with N-phenyl-4-hydroxy-
2-fluoro-3-tosylmethyl-2-(trifluoromethyl)pentanamide (1a).
The reaction took place in THF at reflux. After 21 h, the
expected 2-phenylamino-3-tosylmethyl-2-trifluoromethyl-4-
pentanolide (2a) was formed along with a small amount of
the γ-lactone 3l. As shown in Table 1, a high yield in the
found that N-phenyl-3-hydroxy-2-fluoro-3-tosylmethyl-2-
(trifluoromethyl)pentanamide (1a) was mainly formed at the
initial stage, and thence the amount of 2a increased as the
reaction proceeded.9 With these findings, we started to
investigate reacting various γ-hydroxy-R-fluoro-R-trifluoro-
methyl carboxamides (1) with organoaluminum amides.
The starting γ-hydroxy-R-fluoro-R-trifluoromethyl amides
(1) were prepared from R-fluoro-R-trifluoromethyl-γ-lactones
(3) with aniline, benzylamine, or p-anisidine. Detailed
procedures for the preparation of 1 are given in Supporting
Information.
Table 1. Reaction of 1a with Trimethylaluminum or DIBAL-H
yield (%)a
entry
aluminum reagent
Me3Al
equiv
2a
3l
1a
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
none
1.2
2.2
3.2
1.2
2.2
3.2
0
66
69
63
56
78
66
19b
23
14
15
34
7
76b
3
0
0
0
DIBAL-H
0
0
0
a Yields were determined by 1H NMR using Ph3CH as an internal
standard. b Isolated yield.
formation of 2a was attained using more than 1 molar equiv
of the aluminum reagent, though the yield of 2a became
maximal at 2.2 molar equiv of the aluminum reagent.
Interestingly, 2a was also formed as a single diastereomer
in any case. Because its 1H NMR spectrum was very similar
to that of 2b, the structure of 2a was likely to have the same
pentanolide skeleton. Fortunately, this product gave good
quality single crystals. From the ORTEP structure of 2a (see
Supporting Information) obtained by single-crystal X-ray
At first, we examined the types of organometallic reagent
that would be effective for the conversion of 1 to 2.
(4) Bond strength of metal-fluorine: Al-F, 663.6 ( 6.3 kJ/mol; Li-F,
577 ( 21 kJ/mol; Ti-F, 569 ( 34 kJ/mol; Si-F, 552.7 ( 2.1 kJ/mol;
Sn-F, 466.5(13 kJ/mol; Mg-F, 461.9 ( 5.0 kJ/mol. See: Weast, R. C.
Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 65th ed.; CRC Press: New York,
1984-1985.
(5) (a) Mukaiyama, T.; Murai, Y.; Shoda, S. Chem. Lett. 1981, 431-
432. (b) Hashimoto, S.; Hayashi, M.; Noyori, R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1984,
25, 1379-1382. (c) Kobayashi, S.; Koide, K.; Ohno, M. Tetrahedron Lett.
1990, 31, 2435-2438. (d) Toshima, K.; Tatsuta, K. Chem. ReV. 1993, 93,
1503-1531.
(7) Ooi, T.; Kagoshima, N.; Maruoka, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119,
5754-5755.
(8) Ooi, T.; Uraguchi, D.; Kagoshima, N.; Maruoka, K. Tetrahedron Lett.
1997, 38, 5679-5682.
(6) Posner, G. H.; Haines, S. R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1985, 26, 1823-1826.
(9) See Supporting Information
590
Org. Lett., Vol. 7, No. 4, 2005