ORGANIC
LETTERS
2007
Vol. 9, No. 9
1683-1685
Syntheses of Amamistatin Fragments
and Determination of Their HDAC and
Antitumor Activity
Kelley A. Fennell† and Marvin J. Miller*,†,‡
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry and Walther Cancer Center,
UniVersity of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana 46556, and Leibniz Institute for
Natural Product Research and Infection Biology, Hans-Kno¨ll-Institute,
Beutenbergstrasse 11a, D-07745 Jena, Germany
Received February 14, 2007
ABSTRACT
Amamistatins A and B are natural products found to have anti-proliferative effects against MCF-7, A549, and MKN45 human tumor cell lines
(IC50 0.24 0.56 M). It was proposed that their activity was due to histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibition mediated by the N-formyl-N-hydroxy
−
µ
lysine moiety. Amamistatin B fragment analogs were synthesized and screened for biological activity. These compounds were modest HDAC
inhibitors and showed antitumor activity against MCF-7 and PC-3 human tumor cells.
Histone deacetylase (HDAC) enzymes work with histone
acetyltransferases (HATs) to modulate levels of histone
acetylation, which are directly related to gene expression.1,2
Aberrant recruitment of histone deacetylases can lead to gene
silencing and tumor growth, and small molecule HDAC
inhibitors cause differentiation, growth arrest, and apoptosis
in tumor cells.3 Many HDAC inhibitors such as Trichostatin
A (TSA)4 and SAHA5 (Figure 1) contain a hydroxamic acid
moiety, used to chelate the catalytic Zn2+ found in the
enzyme active site. The N-formyl hydroxylamine, or retro-
hydroxamate, is an alternative zinc-binding ligand that has
also been employed in the synthesis of HDAC inhibitors.6,7
Amamistatins A and B are natural products isolated from
the actinomycete Nocardia asteroides.8 Amamistatin A was
found to have anti-proliferative effects against MCF-7 breast,
A549 lung, and MKN45 stomach human tumor cell lines,
with IC50 values of 0.48, 0.56, and 0.24 µM, respectively.
The amamistatin structure, containing a lysine-derived N-
formyl hydroxylamine, is very similar to that of related
natural products formobactin,9 nocobactin,10 brasilibactin,11
and the mycobactins12 (Figure 2). We proposed that the anti-
(6) Wu, T. Y. H.; Hassig, C.; Wu, Y.; Ding, S.; Schultz, P. G. Bioorg.
Med. Chem. Lett. 2004, 14, 449-453.
(7) Nishino, N.; Yoshikawa, D.; Watanabe, L. A.; Kato, T.; Jose, B.;
Komatsu, Y.; Sumida, Y.; Yoshida, M. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2004,
14, 2427-2431.
(8) (a) Suenaga, K.; Kokubo, S.; Shinohara, C.; Tsuji, T.; Uemura, D.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 1945-1948. (b) Kokubo, S.; Suenaga, K.;
Shinohara, C.; Tsuji, T.; Uemura, D. Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 6435-6400.
(9) Murakami, Y.; Kato, S.; Nakajima, M.; Matsuoka, M.; Kawai, H.;
Shin-Ya, K.; Seto, H. J. Antibiot. 1996, 49, 839-845.
† University of Notre Dame.
‡ Hans-Kno¨ll-Institute.
(1) Meinke, P. T.; Liberator, P. Curr. Med. Chem. 2001, 8, 211-235.
(2) Johnstone, R. W. Nat. ReV. Drug DiscoVery 2002, 1, 287-299.
(3) Miller, T. A.; Witter, D. J.; Belvedere, S. J. Med. Chem. 2003, 46,
5097-5116.
(4) Yoshida, M.; Kijima, M.; Akita, M.; Beppu, T. J. Biol. Chem. 1990,
265, 17174-17179.
(5) Richon, V. M.; Emiliani, S.; Verdin, E.; Webb, Y.; Breslow, R.;
Rifkind, R. A.; Marks, P. A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1998, 95, 3003-
3007.
(10) Ratledge, C.; Snow, G. A. Biochem. J. 1974, 139, 407-413.
(11) Tsuda, M.; Yamakawa, M.; Oka, S.; Tanaka, Y.; Hoshino, Y.;
Mikami, Y.; Sato, A.; Fujiwara, H.; Ohizumi, Y.; Kobayashi, J. J. Nat.
Prod. 2005, 68, 462-464.
(12) Snow, G. A. Bacteriol. ReV. 1970, 34, 99-125.
10.1021/ol070382e CCC: $37.00
© 2007 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 03/31/2007