2502
Root, Bailor, and Norris
The results in Table 1a give a general picture for the reactivity of acid
chlorides in this chemistry. In all cases, the starting azide 7 was consumed
after the PS-PPh3 was added, as seen from TLC analysis of the reaction
mixture, and after 6 hr at 408C only two reactions, that of 7 with PS-PPh3
and pyrrolidinoyl chloride (entry g, Table 1) and that of 7 with PS-PPh3 and
pivaloyl chloride (entry i, Table 1), failed to provide any amide product.
The azide was consumed in both cases, but little or no carbohydrate product
was isolated, which indicates that the intermediate (now polymer-bound)
iminophosphorane does not react efficiently with these acid chlorides under
these conditions. The highest yield, i.e., for the formation of the p-nitroben-
zoyl amide 9a, suggests that the polymer-bound iminophosphorane reacts
most efficiently with highly electrophilic acid chlorides. Furthermore, the
lack of an amide product from reaction with pivaloyl chloride indicates that
the large t-butyl substituent retards the rate of reaction between the poly-
mer-bound iminophosphorane and acid chloride. The remainder of the carbo-
hydrate material is presumably still attached to the polymer support.
aAll new compounds were homogeneous by TLC and at least 95% pure as indicated by
1H NMR spectra. All compounds gave satisfactory analytical data, including 1H NMR
(400 MHz), 13C NMR (100 MHz), and mass spectra. Typical procedure for the
formation of glucopyranosyl amides using polymer-supported triphenylphosphine:
D-glucosyl azide 7 (100 mg, 0.27 mmol) and p-nitrobenzoyl chloride (0.54 mmol)
were dissolved in CH2Cl2 (5.0 mL). Polymer-supported triphenylphosphine (ꢀ3 mmol/
g loading, 116 mg, ꢀ0.35 mmol) was added to the tube, and the mixture was agitated
until the release of nitrogen gas had ceased. The mixture was then agitated and
refluxed gently for 6 hr. The mixture was cooled, gravity filtered into another test
tube to remove polymer-supported triphenyphosphine oxide, which was washed with
CH2Cl2 (2 ꢀ 5 mL). Polystyrene-bound tris(2-aminoethyl) amine (4.0–5.0 mmol/g
loading, 200 mg, ꢀ0.88 mmol) was added to the solution, and the mixture was
agitated for 2 hr at room temperature. The polymer was removed via gravity filtration,
washed with CH2Cl2 (2 ꢀ 5 mL), and the filtrate was concentrated in vacuo to leave
the product residue. Physical characteristics for amide 9a: 400 MHz 1H NMR
(CDCl3) d 2.03, 2.04, 2.05 (3s, 12H total, 4 ꢀ COCH3), 3.91 (m, 1H, H-5), 4.09
(dd, 1H, H-6, J ¼ 1.83, 12.45 Hz), 4.31 (dd, 1H, H-60, J ¼ 4.39, 12.08 Hz), 5.05
(m, 2H, H-3, H-4), 5.39 (m, 2H, H-1, H-2), 7.32 (d, 1H, NH, J ¼ 9.15 Hz), 7.92
(d, 2H, Ar-H), 8.30 (d, 2H, Ar-H). 100 MHz 13C NMR (CDCl3): d 21.97, 62.63,
69.18, 72.09, 73.41, 74.87, 80.06, 124.96, 129.40, 129.60, 139.08, 151.05, 166.04,
170.77, 171.52, 172.84. Mass calculated: 497.15. Found: 497.18. [a]2D0 -19.3 (c 5.1,
CH2Cl2). TLC Rf-values for glycosyl amides (aluminum-backed silica gel plates
using 1 : 1 EtOAc/hexane as eluent and visualization with 5% H2SO4 in ethanol
followed by heating on a hot plate): 9a, 0.72; 9b, 0.66; 9c, 0.69; 9d, 0.70; 9e, 0.70;
9f, 0.70; 9h, 0.60; 9j, 0.69; 9k, 0.66; 9l, 0.36.