Intramolecular Ion-Ion Interactions in Zwitterionic Catalysts
J. Am. Chem. Soc., Vol. 119, No. 22, 1997 5133
Scheme 1. Reactions of Cp2Zr(CH3)2 with HB(C6F5)2
(MAO)9 based and those yielding polyfluorinated borate coun-
terions (e.g., B(C6F5)3,10 [HNR3]+[B(C6F5)4]-,11 or [Ph3C]+[B-
(C6F5)4]- 12). Given the impact ion-ion interactions can have
on polymerization activity, a detailed understanding of these
contacts is necessary for the rational design of new catalysts
and/or new activators.13
While little is known regarding [Cp2MR]+[MAO]- interac-
tions,14 several classes of [Cp2MR]+[borate]- contacts have been
structurally and/or spectroscopically established. For example,
when cationic metallocenes with borate counterions of the
general formula [XB(C6F5)3]- (X ) C6F5, H, or an abstracted
alkyl group) are generated in the absence of Lewis base donors,
the borate counterion may stabilize the highly Lewis acidic metal
center via a fluorine atom lone pair,15 a three-center two-electron
µ-hydride16 or methyl bridge,17 or the arene π-system of an
abstracted benzyl group.18
One strategy for controlling ion-ion interactions is to prepare
zwitterionic catalysts wherein the charges are physically sepa-
rated by covalent attachment of a borate counterion within the
ancillary structure of the supporting ligand of the catalyst.
Hlatky and Turner19 had early success using this tactic,
producing highly active zwitterionic catalysts incorporating
borate- and carborane-type counterions. More recently the
groups of Bochmann20 and Erker21 have taken diverse synthetic
approaches toward zwitterionic catalysts. Although these
compounds exhibit ethylene polymerization activities akin to
non-zwitterionic analogs, quantitative comparison studies to
show that higher activities can be achieved by enforced charge
separation are yet to be done.
two competing pathways by which HB(C6F5)2 reacts with simple
zirconocene bis-alkyls (Scheme 1).16a One involved loss of
alkane to produce borane-stabilized alkylidene derivatives of
zirconocene, while the other was an alkyl/hydride exchange
reaction24 followed by complexation of HB(C6F5)2 to the newly
formed Zr-H moiety, giving borate derivatives. While interest-
ing, this chemistry ran counter to the goal of forming zwitte-
rionic compounds capable of polymerizing olefins in the absence
of further cocatalysts.
We decided to utilize the alkyl/hydride exchange reaction to
our advantage and treat group 4 metallocene compounds with
tethered alkyl ligands with HB(C6F5)2 to prepare zwitterionic
compounds. One family of compounds with the requisite
tethered alkyl functionality are the so-called “tucked-in” per-
methyl metallocenes in which one of the C5Me5 (Cp*) methyl
groups has undergone metallation and is σ bound to the metal
center. Several such compounds are known, including the tuck-
in chloro, phenyl, and methyl derivatives Cp*(C5Me4CH2)ZrX
(X ) Cl (1a),25 C6H5 (1b),26 CH3 (1c)). Herein we describe
the reactions of these tuck-in precursors with both HB(C6F5)2
and the more common activator B(C6F5)3. The zwitterionic
products provide structural insights into cation-anion interac-
tions and are highly active olefin polymerization catalysts which
do not require other cocatalysts.
Our initial attempts to prepare zwitterionic catalysts for olefin
polymerization involved hydroboration of olefinic groups at-
tached to the cyclopentadienyl ligand framework of conventional
metallocene catalysts22 with use of the highly electrophilic
borane reagent [HB(C6F5)2]2.23 During the course of these
studies, we found that HB(C6F5)2, in addition to hydroborating
the pendant olefin, reacted with the Zr-C bonds of alkyl
compounds containing these ligands. Separate studies revealed
(8) For example, the contrasting results found in the following references
may be attributed to counterion effects. a) Scollard, J. D.; McConville, D.
H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 10008. b) Scollard, J. D.; McConville, D.
H.; Payne, N. C.; Vittal, J. J. Macromolecules 1996, 29, 5241.
(9) Sinn, H.; Kaminsky, W. AdV. Organomet. Chem. 1980, 18, 99.
(10) (a) Massey, A. G.; Park, A. J. J. Organomet. Chem. 1964, 2, 245.
(b) Yang, X.; Stern, C. L.; Marks, T. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 3623.
(11) Yang, X.; Stern, C. L.; Marks, T. J. Organometallics 1991, 10, 840.
(12) (a) Bochmann, M.; Lancaster, S. J. J. Organomet. Chem. 1992, 434,
C1. (b) Chien, J. C. W.; Tsai, W. M.; Rausch, M. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1991, 113, 8570.
(13) Chen, Y.-X.; Stern, C. L.; Yang, S.; Marks, T. J. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1996, 118, 12451.
(14) Harlan, C. J.; Bott, S. G.; Barron, A. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995,
117, 6465.
(15) Horton, A. D.; Orpen, A. G. Organometallics 1991, 10, 3910.
(16) (a) Spence, R. E. v. H.; Parks, D. J.; Piers, W. E.; MacDonald, M.;
Zaworotko, M. J.; Rettig, S. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1995, 34, 1230.
(b) Sun, Y.; Piers, W. E.; Rettig, S. J. Organometallics 1996, 15, 4110.
(17) Yang, X.; Stern, C. L.; Marks, T. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116,
10015.
Results and Discussion
Reactions of Tucked-In Zirconocenes with HB(C6F5)2.
Tuck-in precursors 1a and 1b were prepared according to
literature procedures25,26 by thermal elimination of RH from
Cp*2Zr(Cl)CH2CMe3 and Cp*2Zr(C6H5)2, respectively. The
tuck-in methyl compound 1c was prepared straightforwardly
from chloro complex 1a and MeLi and isolated as a red powder
in 83% yield.
The chloro and phenyl tuck-in compounds reacted rapidly
and cleanly with 1 equiv of HB(C6F5)2 and 100% regioselec-
tivity for the metallated Zr-C bond (eq 1), yielding zwitterionic
(18) (a) Bochmann, M.; Lancaster, S. J.; Hursthouse, M. B.; Abdul Malik,
K. M. Organometallics 1994, 13, 2235. (b) Bochmann, M.; Lancaster, S.
J. Makromol. Chem. Rapid Commun. 1993, 14, 807. (c) Bochmann, M.;
Lancaster, S. J. Organometallics 1993, 12, 633. (d) Pellecchia, C.; Immirzi,
A.; Grassi, A.; Zambelli, A. Organometallics 1994, 13, 4473.
(19) Hlatky, G. G.; Turner, H. W.; Eckman, R. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1989, 111, 2728.
(20) Bochmann, M.; Lancaster, S. J.; Robinson, O. B. J. Chem. Soc.,
Chem. Commun. 1995, 2081.
(21) (a) Ruwwe, J.; Erker, G.; Fro¨hlich, R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl.
1996, 35, 80. (b) Temme, B.; Karl, J.; Erker, G. Chem. Eur. J. 1996, 2,
919. (c) Temme, B.; Erker, G.; Karl, J.; Luftmann, H.; Fro¨hlich, R.; Kotila,
S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1995, 34, 1755.
complexes 2a and 2b in excellent yield. (All new compounds
were characterized by 1H, 13C, 19F, and 11B NMR spectroscopy;
these data are collected in Tables 1 and 2.) For compounds 2,
(22) Spence, R. E. v. H.; Piers, W. E. Organometallics 1995, 14, 4617.
(23) (a) Parks, D. J.; Spence, R. E. v. H.; Piers, W. E. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. Engl. 1995, 34, 809. (b) Piers, W. E.; Spence, R. E. v. H. U.S.
Patent 5,496,960, March 5, 1996 (University of Guelph).
(24) Marsella, J. A.; Caulton, K. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 2361.
(25) Tjaden, E. B.; Stryker, J. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 2083.
(26) Schock, L. E.; Brock, C. P.; Marks, T. J. Organometallics 1987, 6,
232.