J. CHEM. RESEARCH (S), 1997 219
exchange reactions between the FeIII–4 complexes and
EDTA were determined by following the decrease in absorb-
ance at 425 nm in the presence of a large excess of EDTA.
The relative stability constants of the iron(III) complexes of
TLC and 4d on silica gel. 4a (yield: 59%), solid (hygroscopic): dH
([2H6]DMSO) 1.75–2.18 (14 H, m, CH2CH2ǹNH2), 5.02 (3 H, br s,
OH), 7.35 (3 H, s, NH). 4b (yield: 70%), oil dH ([2H6]DMSO)
2.02–2.27 (14 H, m, CH2CH2ǹNH2), 3.02 (9 H, s, NCH3), 7.87
(3 H, br s, OH). 4c (yield: 95%), oil: dH ([2H6]DMSO) 0.82–0.88
(9 H, t, CH3), 1.19–1.34 (6 H, m, CH2), 1.42–1.53 (6 H, m, CH2),
2.05–2.32 (14 H, m, CH2CH2ǹNH2), 3.43–3.48 (6 H, t, NCH2),
6.70 (3 H, br s, OH). 4d (yield: 79%), oil, dH ([2H6]DMSO)
0.85–0.87 (9 H, t, CH3), 1.26–1.33 (36 H, m, CH2), 2.10–2.30
(14 H, m, CH2CH2ǹNH2), 3.51–3.59 (6 H, t, NCH2), 8.43 (3 H, br
s, OH). RF values on reversed-phase TLC (C18): 4a 0.75
(H2O–MeOH, 80:20); 4b 0.62 (H2O–CH3OH, 60:40); 4c: 0.17
(H2O–MeOH, 40:60). RF value on silica gel TLC: 4d: 0.20
(CH2Cl2–MeOH, 95:5).
4
a, 4a, 4b, 4c and 4d were respectively 0.8Å10ꢀ2, 1.5Å10ꢀ2
,
1.0Å10ꢀ2, 0.2Å10ꢀ2 and 0.4Å10ꢀ2 sꢀ1, suggesting that the
lipophilic compounds 4c and 4d hold iron a little more tightly
than do the other ligands. However, the order of magnitude
of the observed constants indicates that the tripodal ligands 4
form much less stable complexes than does desferrioxamine,
a linear trihydroxamic acid that has an optimal nine-atom
spacing between hydroxamate moieties, and whose exchange
constant towards EDTA is 6.5Å1ꢀ6 sꢀ1 under the same
experimental conditions. The shape of the molecule (linear
or tripodal) and the spacing between the hydroxamic acid
Compound 4
a. To a solution of 3
a (5.6 g, 5.34 mmol) in
dichloromethane (190 ml) was added a solution of hydrochloric
acid (1.1 ) in diethyl ether (30 ml). The solution was stirred for
M
2 h at room temperature. The precipitate was filtered off, washed
with dichloromethane and dried under reduced pressure. The resi-
due was dissolved in water, filtered and lyophilised to give 4
a
(yield: 74%), solid (hygroscopic); dH ([2H6]DMSO) 1.92–2.10
(12 H, m, CH2CH2), 9.90 (3 H, br s, OH), 10.66 (3 H, s, NH).
RF = 0.70 [reversed-phase TLC (C18); H2O–MeOH, 80:20].
Iron-exchange Reactions with EDTA.sThe exchange reactions
between the iron complexes and EDTA were carried out by UV
spectroscopy, noting the decrease in the absorbance at 425 nm in
the presence of an excess of EDTA as previously described.7
units seem to play a major role in creating stable iron(III
)
complexes.
The final hydroxamic acids will be tested as potent antiviral
agents in future work; moreover, as part of a program to
develop novel chelators for the radioimaging of organs and
tumours, the affinity of the trihydroxamic acids 4 towards
gallium(III) and indium(III) will be measured.
Experimental
NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker AC 250 instrument at
250 MHz and UV spectra with a UVIKON 931 spectrometer
(Kontron instruments).
Received, 13th January 1997; Accepted, 28th February 1997
Paper E/7/00300E
Compound 1. Yield: 97%, oil; dH (CDCl3) 2.26–2.28 (12 H, m,
CH2CH2), 3.66 (9 H, s, CH3).
Compound 2. Yield: 65%, solid, mp 175 °C; dH [2H6]DMSO)
2.16–2.17 (12 H, m, CH2CH2), 12.31 (3 H, s, COOH).
Compound 3a. Yield: 77%, solid, mp 107 °C; dH ([2H6]DMSO)
1.93–2.13 (12 H, m, CH2CH2), 4.78 (6 H, s, PhCH2), 7.34–7.40
(15 H, m, C6H5), 11.09 (3 H, s, NH).
References
1 J. B. Neilands, Science, 1967, 156, 1443; R. J. Bergeron, Chem.
Rev., 1984, 84, 587.
2 R. J. Bergeron, C. Z. Liu, J. S. McManis, M. X. B. Xia, S. E. Algee
and J. Weigand, J. Med. Chem., 1994, 37, 1411.
3 C. Sappey, J. R. Boelaert, S. Legrand-Poels, C. Forceille, A.
Favier and J. Piette, AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses, 1995, 11,
1049.
Compound 3
a. Yield: 58%, oil; dH ([2H6]DMSO) 1.88–2.08
(12 H, m, CH2CH2), 7.25–7.48 (15 H, m, C6H5), 10.89 (3 H, s,
NH).
General Procedure for PTC N-alkylation.sTo a dry mixture of 3a
(9 mmol) and potassium tert-butoxide (45 mmol) was added Ali-
quat 336 (0.1 g). After 2 h under stirring at 50 °C, methyl iodide,
n-butyl or n-octyl bromide (5–10 mol equiv.) were added and the
mixture was stirred for 2 h at 50 °C. Chromatography on silica gel
with a silica gel with a mixture of dichloromethane and methanol as
eluent (ranging from 99:1 to 95:5) provided the desired com-
pounds. 3b (yield: 67%), oil, dH (CDCl3 2.15–2.20 (12 H, m,
CH2CH2), 3.17 (9 H, s, NCH3), 4.77 (6 H, s, PhCH2), 7.36 (15 H, s,
C6H5). 3c (yield: 55%), oil, dH (CDCl3) 0.87–0.93 (9 H, t, CH3),
1.25–1.35 (6 H, m, CH2), 1.54–1.63 (6 H, m, CH2), 2.08–2.27
(12 H, m, CH2CH2), 3.58–3.64 (6 H, t, NCH2), 4.75 (6 H, s, PhCH2),
7.36 (15 H, s, C6H5). 3d (yield: 48%) oil 0.87 (9 H, s, CH3),
1.25–1.30 (36 H, m, CH2), 2.08–2.23 (12 H, m, CH2CH2), 3.56–3.60
(6 H, t, NCH2), 4.75 (6 H, s, PhCH2), 7.36 (15 H, s, C6H5).
General Procedure for Debenzylation.sTo a solution of 3a–d (9
mmol) in methanol (50 ml) was added under argon 10% Pd–C
(2.5 g) and a solution of ammonium formate (90 mmol) in metha-
nol (100 ml). The mixture was heated at 65 °C for 12 h under argon.
After cooling, the mixture was filtered through a Celite pad. The
palladium was washed three times with methanol, and the filtrate
was evaporated. 4a–c were chromatographed on reversed-phase
4 (a) E. V. Dehmlow, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1977, 16, 493; (b)
for Michael addition via PTC, see for example: V. Dryanska, K.
Popandova and C. Ivanov, Synth. Commun., 1987, 17, 211; G.
Bram, H. Galons, S. Labidalle, A. Loupy, M. Miocque, A. Petit, P.
Pigeon and J. Sansoulet, Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr., 1989, 247; (c) for
PTC N-alkylation, see for example: R. J. M. Nolte and D. J. Cram,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1984, 106, 1416; E. V. Dehmlow and Y. R. Rao,
Synth. Commun., 1988, 18, 487.
5 G. R. Newkome, C. N. Moorefield and G. R. Baker, Aldrichim.
Acta, 1992, 25, 31.
6 A. M. Lobo, M. M. Marques, S. Prabhakar and H. S. Rzepa, J. Org.
Chem., 1987, 52, 2925; R. J. Bergeron and J. S. McManis, Tetra-
hedron, 1990, 46, 5881; J. M. Altenburger, C. Mioskowski, H.
d’Orchymont, D. Schirlin, C. Schalk and C. Tarnus, Tetrahedron
Lett., 1992, 33, 5055; M. A. Staszak and C. W. Doecke, Tetrahedron
Lett., 1994, 35, 6021; J. Zhu, S. Robin, C. Goasdou´e, A. Loupy and
H. Galons, Synth. Commun., 1995, 25, 2515; S. S. Nikam, B. E.
Kornberg, D. R. Johnson and A. M. Doherty, Tetrahedron Lett.,
1995, 36, 197.
7 M. Akiyama, A. Katoh and T. Ogawa, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans.
2, 1989, 1213.