6708
J . Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 6708-6709
Sch em e 1
Regiocon tr olled Syn th esis of
Cp Co-Cyclobu ta d ien yl-Br id ged
p-Cyclop h a n es via An n u la tion of Acyclic
Diyn es
Ronald G. Brisbois,*,† Louis E. Fogel,
Olivier J .- C. Nicaise, and Peter J . DeWeerd
Department of Chemistry, Hamline University, 1536 Hewitt
Avenue, St. Paul, Minnesota 55104-1284
Noncovalent interactions between aromatic units are
key facets of host-guest chemistry1 and are thought to
be important in protein folding.2 In the extreme, two
aromatic moieties can orient either π-face to π-face or
π-face to π-edge. In order to examine the degree to which
such interactions can constrain conformational mobility,
we initiated a program of research directed toward the
synthesis of o,p-cyclophanes derived from a structural
core which remains conformationally dynamic (on the
NMR time scale) even at low temperature.3 Along with
classical approaches4 to this series of compounds, we have
also probed Co-mediated [2 + 2 + 2] aromatic annula-
tions5 on bis-alkyne 1 as a potential means of maximizing
synthetic convergence (eq 1). The required closure of the
specific opportunity/challenge of working with acyclic
diynes as a function of the two possible regiochemical
outcomes in the Co-mediated [2 + 2] annulation: 1,2-
tethered (6) and/or 1,3-tethered (7) products. Either
through careful separation of regioisomers or by regio-
control in the Co-mediated [2 + 2] annulation, mixed
cyclophanes with π-face (aryl)/π-edge (CpCo-cyclobuta-
dienyl) or π-face (aryl)/π-face (CpCo-cyclobutadienyl)
geometries could, in principle, be obtained. We report
here our preliminary results.
The first case we investigated (5a ) featured five-atom
tethering chains to ensure a high degree of conforma-
tional freedom and allow for the formation of either
cyclophane 6 or 7. The attempted annulation of 5a was
inconclusive, yet encouraging, because an extremely
unstable product mixture was obtained which we tenta-
tively assigned as an unknown ratio of 6a and 7a . Our
experience in isolating and handling the stable compound
3, along with literature precedent,7b suggested investiga-
tion of acyclic diyne 5b. Reaction of 5b proceeded
smoothly to afford only the 1,2-tethered product 6b in
40% yield. Gleiter and co-workers have observed similar
regiocontrol in the reaction of cyclic silyl-substituted
diynes.8f Our repeated attempts to isolate/characterize
the corresponding 1,3-tethered product 7b have proven
fruitless thus far. Mixed cyclophane 6b is highly crystal-
line and readily yielded crystals suitable for X-ray
analysis. A synopsis of some key structural features of
6b is provided in Figure 1.9
medium/large bridging ring was very inefficient and
unreproducible;6 however, an interesting compound (3),
containing bis-CpCo-cyclobutadienyl moieties, was iso-
lated and characterized.7 We were motivated by this
result to redirect a portion of our efforts to the synthesis
and characterization of mixed aryl/CpCo-cyclobutadienyl
cyclophanes via a highly convergent, Co-mediated [2 +
2] annulation of readily accessible acyclic diyne precur-
sors (Scheme 1).
Gleiter and co-workers have reported elegant work on
the Co-mediated conversion of cyclic diyne precursors to
CpCo-cyclobutadienyl superphanes.8 We viewed the
The next case we investigated provided a gratifying
result. Annulation of acyclic diyne 5c afforded only the
1,3-tethered product 7c in 37% yield. Mixed cyclophane
7c is also highly crystalline, and structural details are
provided in Figure 1.9 Multiple attempts to isolate/
characterize the corresponding 1,2-tethered product 6c
have been unsuccessful. Clearly, the CO2Et group mani-
fests its own unique mode of regiocontrol in the Co-
mediated [2 + 2] annulation.
† NSF-Presidential Faculty Fellow, 1993-97.
(1) (a) Host-Guest Chemistry; Vo¨gtle, F., Weber, E., Eds.; Springer-
Verlag: Berlin, 1985. (b) Cyclophanes; Diederich, F.; CRC Press, Inc.:
Boca Raton, FL, 1991. (c) Calixarenes; Gutsche, C. D.; CRC Press,
Inc.: Boca Raton, FL, 1989.
(2) (a) Burley, S. K.; Petsko, G. A. Adv. Protein Chem. 1988, 39,
125. (b) Serrano, L.; Bycroft, M.; Fersht, A. R. J . Mol. Biol. 1991, 218,
465.
(3) (a) Brisbois, R. G.; Wanke, R. A.; Burns, S. J .; Rappath, D. W.
Unpublished results. (b) Asami, M.; Krieger, C.; Staab, H. A. Tetra-
hedron Lett. 1991, 32, 2117.
Why do the SiMe3 and CO2Et groups exert opposite
modes of regiocontrol in the Co-mediated annulation?
Gleiter8f and Vollhardt5 have discussed the importance
(4) (a) Cyclophanes; Keehn, P. M., Rosenfeld, S. M., Eds.; Academic
Press: New York, 1983; Vols.
Cyclophanes II; Vo¨gtle, F., Ed.; Topics in Current Chemistry 113 and
115; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 1983.
I and II. (b) Cyclophanes I and
(9) The authors have deposited atomic coordinates for structures
depicted in Figure 1 with the Cambridge Cystallographic Data Centre.
The coordinates can be obtained, upon request, from the Director,
Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, 12 Union Road, Cambridge,
CB2 1EZ, U.K.
(10) A number of cobaltacyclopentadienes have been isolated and
characterized. (a) McAlister, D. R.; Bercaw, J . E.; Bergman, R. G. J .
Am. Chem. Soc. 1977, 99, 1666. (b) McDonnell Bushnell, L. P.; Evitt,
E. R.; Bergman, R. G. J . Organomet. Chem. 1978, 157, 445. (c)
Yamazaki, H.; Wakatsuki, Y. J . Organomet. Chem. 1977, 139, 157.
(d) Yamazaki, H.; Wakatsuki, Y. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102, 4363.
(11) (a) Comparison of the acidities of (i-Pr)2NH (pKa ≈ 40) and
(Me3Si)2NH (pKa ≈ 28) provides an example which can be used to
advantage in enolate generation. See: Brown, C. A. J . Org. Chem.
1974, 39, 3913. Danheiser, R. L.; Miller, R. F.; Brisbois, R. G; Park, S.
Z. J . Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 1959 and references cited therein. (b) Colvin,
E. Silicon in Organic Synthesis; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 1983.
(5) Vollhardt, K. P. C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1984, 23, 539.
(6) For an example of successful closure of a medium/large ring via
Co-mediated [2 + 2 + 2] aromatic annulation, see: Lofthagen, M.;
Chadha, R.; Siegel, J . S. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 8785.
(7) (a) Rausch, M. D.; Genetti, R. A. J . Org. Chem. 1970, 35, 3888.
(b) Hillard, R. L., III; Vollhardt, K. P. C. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1977, 99,
4058. (c) Efraty, A. Chem. Rev. 1977, 77, 691.
(8) (a) Gleiter, R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1992, 31, 27 and
references cited therein. (b) Gleiter, R.; Merger, R.; Nuber, B. J . Am.
Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 8921. (c) Gleiter, R.; Merger, R.; Irngartinger,
H.; Nuber, B. J . Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 2025. (d) Gleiter, R.; Langer,
H.; Nuber, B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1994, 33, 1272. (e) Gleiter,
R.; Langer, H.; Schehlmann, V.; Nuber, B. Organometallics 1995, 14,
975. (f) Gleiter, R.; Stahr, H.; Nuber, B. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36,
4607.
S0022-3263(97)01022-0 CCC: $14.00 © 1997 American Chemical Society