Cationic Phosphenium Complexes of Iron
Organometallics, Vol. 16, No. 21, 1997 4633
some barriers have been reported for three-electron
donor terminal phosphide complexes, [LnMdPR2], which
can be considered as phosphenium complexes if one
thinks that they consist of LnM- and +PR2: ∆Gq < 10
kcal/mol for Cp*HfCl2{P(CMe3)2} and Cp*HfCl{P(C-
Me3)2}2,23 ∆Gq ) 8.4-9.9 kcal/mol for 1,2-M2(PR2)2-
(NMe2)4 (M ) Mo, W),24 and ∆Gq ) 11.6 kcal/mol for
Cp*Ta(C2H4)Me(PPh2).25 Therefore, the comparison of
these data reveals that barriers to rotation about an
M-PR2 bond do not differ considerably whether these
complexes are electrically cationic or neutral.
1
Va r ia ble-Tem p er a tu r e H NMR Sp ectr oscop y of
1
4e. The H and 13C NMR spectra of 4e in CD2Cl2 at
room temperature show that the two methyl groups on
the Sn atom are magnetically equivalent, indicating that
an OTf- anion and an amino group in the phosphorus
ligand dissociate from the Sn, resulting in the rotation
of the SnMe2 group along with Fe-Sn bond. The 1H
NMR signals of the Me groups in 4e were found to be
temperature dependent. One singlet was observed
above 300 K, whereas two resonances were observed at
178 K. As the temperature was raised, the two reso-
nances gradually broadened and finally coalesced to one
broad resonance at 188 K. With an increase in tem-
perature, the resonance became to a sharp singlet.
Application of the coalescence formula gave a ∆Gq(188
K) value of 9.0 kcal/mol for the methyl group exchange.
This value is close to the ∆Gq values for methyl
exchange of RedEMe2 (E ) Si and Ge) reported by
Gladysz: ∆Gq (307 K) > 14.8 kcal/mol for [CpRe(NO)-
(PPh3)(dSiMe2)]OTf26 and ∆Gq (211 K) ) 9.6 kcal/mol
for [CpRe(NO)(PPh3)(dGeMe2)]OTf.27
F igu r e 6. Eyring plot for the rotation of the phosphenium
ligand along the Fe-P axis derived from variable-temper-
ature NMR data.
Ta ble 5. Activa tion P a r a m eter s ∆Hq, ∆Sq, a n d ∆Gq
for 2b, 3b, a n d 5b
2b
3b
5b
∆Hq (kcal mol-1
∆Sq (cal mol-1 K-1
∆Gq (kcal mol-1
)
15.6 ( 0.46
11.7 ( 1.85
12.7 ( 0.9
(248 K)
14.3 ( 1.10
14.3 ( 5.18
11.0 ( 2.2
(221 K)
12.7 ( 0.53
8.60 ( 2.49
10.8 ( 1.1
(223 K)
)
)
The small positive entropies of activation in all cases
imply no participation of solvent, which is consistent
with phosphenium ligand rotation. The comparable
values of ∆Hq have been observed for 2b, 3b, and 5b. It
is well-known in organosilicon chemistry that car-
bonium ion formation or development at a position â to
a silicon atom (Si-C-C+) is favored.21 The so-called
â-effect has been ascribed to overlap between the vacant
p orbital on the â carbon atom and the σ orbital between
the silicon atom and the R carbon atom (σ-π conjuga-
tion). Recently, the â-effect was reported for germyl and
stannyl groups, and the magnitude has been predicted
to increase in the order C < Si < Ge < Sn.22 The
stability of 2b, 3b, and 5b can be considered to be
ascribed to the â-effect of the silyl, germyl, and stannyl
groups, respectively, because the positive phosphenium
phosphorus is located at the â position to the group 14
elements (E-Fe-P+). However, the ∆Hq values ob-
tained are almost identical for 2b, 3b, and 5b. There-
fore, the â-effect of a group 14 element on the stability
of a phosphenium complex seems to be small.
Con clu sion
The reaction product in the reaction of Cp(CO)(ER3)-
Fe{PNN(OMe)} (a ) (E ) group 14 element) with a Lewis
acid such as BF3‚OEt2 or TMSOTf depends on E
(Scheme 6). In any case, an OMe anion abstraction by
a Lewis acid uniformly takes place at the first stage of
the reaction to give a cationic phosphenium iron complex
containing an ER3 ligand (b). The subsequent reaction
is strongly dependent on E. When E is C, migratory
insertion of the phosphenium ligand into the Fe-C bond
(23) Roddick, D. M.; Santarsiero, B. D.; Bercaw, J . E. J . Am. Chem.
Soc. 1985, 107, 4670.
(24) Buhro, W. E.; Chisholm, M. H.; Folting, K.; Huffman, J . C.;
Martin, J . D.; Streib, W. E. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 557.
(25) Baker, R. T.; Calabrese, J . C.; Harlow, R. L.; Williams, I. D.
Organometallics 1993, 12, 830.
Our observation of barriers to rotation about a transi-
tion-metal-phosphorus bond in cationic phosphenium
complexes [LnM-PR2]+ is unprecedented. However,
(26) Lee, K. E.; Arif, A. M.; Gladysz, J . A. Chem. Ber. 1991, 124,
309.
(27) Lee, K. E.; Gladysz, J . A. Phosphorus, Sulfur Silicon Relat.
Elem. 1994, 87, 113.
(19) Sandstro¨m, J . In Dynamic NMR Spectroscopy; Academic
Press: New York, 1982; Chapter 7.
(20) (a) DNMR5: Stephenson, D. S.; Binch, G. Program 365,
Quantum Chemistry Program Exchange; Indiana University: Bloom-
ington, IN. (b) DNMR5 (IBM-PC version): LeMaster, C. B.; LeMaster,
C. L.; True, N. S. Program QCMP 059, Quantum Chemistry Program
Exchange; Indiana University: Bloomington, IN.
(21) (a) Colvin, E. W. Silicon in Organic Synthesis; Butterworths:
London, 1981; p 15. (b) Apeloig, Y. The Chemistry of Organic Silicon
Compounds; Patai, S., Rappoport, Z., Eds.; J ohn Wiley & Sons: New
York, 1989; Vol. 1, p 196. (c) Bassindale, A. R.; Taylor, P. G. The
Chemistry of Organic Silicon Compounds; Patai, S., Rappoport, Z., Eds;
J ohn Wiley & Sons: New York, 1989; Vol. 2, p 905. (d) Thomas, S. E.
Organic Synthesis, The Roles of Boron and Silicon; Oxford University
Press: Oxford, 1991; p 48.
(22) (a) Dallaire, C.; Brook, M. A. Organometallics 1990, 9, 2873.
(b) Dallaire, C.; Brook, M. A. Organometallics 1993, 12, 2332. (c)
Nguyen, K. A.; Gordon, M. S.; Wang, G.-t.; Lambert, J . B. Organome-
tallics 1991, 10, 2798.
(28) (a) Sharma, H. K.; Pannell, K. H. Chem. Rev. 1995, 95, 1351.
(b) Tobita, H.; Ueno, K.; Shimoi, M.; Ogino, H. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1990,
112, 3415. (c) Tobita, H.; Wada, H.; Ueno, K.; Ogino, H. Organome-
tallics 1994, 13, 2545. (d) Okazaki, M.; Tobita, H.; Ogino, H. Chem.
Lett. 1996, 477. (e) Ueno, K.; Nakano, K.; Ogino, H. Chem. Lett. 1996,
459. (f) Pannell, K. H.; Brun, M.-C.; Sharma, H.; J ones, K.; Sharma,
S. Organometallics 1994, 13, 1075. (g) Pannell, K. H.; Cervantes, J .;
Hernandez, C.; Cassias, J .; Vincenti, S. Organometallics 1986, 5, 1056.
(h) Pestana, D. C.; Koloski, T. S.; Berry, D. H. Organometallics 1994,
13, 4173. (i) Tanaka, Y.; Yamashita, H.; Tanaka, M. Organometallics
1995, 14, 530. (j) Tamao, K.; Sun, G.; Kawachi, A. J . Am. Chem. Soc.
1995, 117, 8043. (k) Mitchell, G. P.; Tilley, T. D.; Yap, G. P. A.;
Rheingold, A. L. Organometallics 1995, 14, 5472. (l) Tatsumi, K.;
Sekiguchi, Y.; Nakamura, A. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108, 1358. (m)
Pannell, K. H.; Sharma, S. Organometallics 1991, 10, 1655. (n) Koe,
J . R.; Tobita, H.; Suzuki, T.; Ogino, H. Organometallics 1992, 11, 150.
(o) Figge, L. K.; Carroll, P. J .; Berry, D. H. Organometallics 1996, 15,
209. (p) Sharma, H.; Pannell, K. H. Organometallics 1994, 13, 4946.