2 L. E. Paquette, M. J. Kinney and U. Dullweber, J. Org. Chem.,
1997, 62, 1713–1722.
3 For a review: H. N. C. Wong, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 1999,
1757–1765.
4 (a) M. J. Smith, E. P. Mazzola, J. J. Sims, S. L. Midland,
N. T. Keen, V. Burton and M. M. Stayton, Tetrahedron Lett.,
1993, 34, 223–226; (b) S. L. Midland, N. T. Keen, J. J. Sims,
M. M. Midland, M. M. Stayton, V. Burton, M. J. Smith,
E. P. Mazzola, K. J. Graham and J. Clardy, J. Org. Chem.,
1993, 58, 2940–2945.
5 P. M. Hon, C. M. Lee, H. S. Shang, Y. X. Cui, H. N. C. Wong and
H. M. Chang, Phytochemistry, 1991, 30, 354–356.
6 (a) S. Umezawa, T. Usui, H. Umezawa, T. Tsuchiya, T. Takeuchi
and M. Hamada, J. Antibiot., 1971, 24, 85–92; (b) S. Umezawa,
T. Tsuchiya, H. Naganawa, T. Takeuchi and H. Umezawa,
J. Antibiot., 1971, 24, 93–106.
7 R. L. Edwards, D. J. Maitland, C. L. Oliver, M. S. Pacey,
L. Shields and A. J. S. Whalley, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1,
1999, 715–719.
8 N. Tanaka, M. Okasaka, Y. Ishimaru, Y. Takaishi, M. Sato,
M. Okamoto, T. Oshikawa, S. U. Ahmed, L. M. Consentino and
K.-H. Lee, Org. Lett., 2005, 7, 2997–2999.
Scheme 3 Proposed mechanism for the diastereoselectivity of one-
pot reaction.
9 (a) A. C. Arau´ jo, A. P. Rauter, F. Nicotra, C. Airoldi, B. Costa
and L. Cipolla, J. Med. Chem., 2011, 54, 1266–1275;
(b) S. L. Midland, N. T. Keen and J. J. Sims, J. Org. Chem.,
1995, 60, 1118–1119.
10 (a) N. Noguchi and M. Nakada, Org. Lett., 2006, 8, 2039–2042;
(b) N. Haddad, I. Rukhman and Z. Abramovich, J. Org. Chem.,
1997, 62, 7629–7636.
11 (a) Q.-W. Zhang, C.-A. Fan, H.-J. Zhang, Y.-Q. Tu, Y.-M. Zhao,
P. Gu and Z.-M. Chen, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2009, 48,
8572–8574; (b) L. A. Paquette, J. C. Lanter and J. N. Johnsto,
J. Org. Chem., 1997, 62, 1702–1712.
12 (a) M. P. Doyle and A. B. Dyatkin, J. Org. Chem., 1995, 60,
3035–3038; (b) M. N. Villalobos and J. L. Wood, Tetrahedron Lett.,
2009, 50, 6450–6453.
13 M. Lejkowski, P. Banerjee, J. Runsink and H.-J. Gais, Org. Lett.,
2008, 10, 2713–2716.
14 (a) P. R. Sridhar, K. C. Ashalu and S. Chandrasekaran, Org. Lett.,
2004, 6, 1777–1779; (b) P. R. Sridhar, P. V. Kumar, K. Seshadri
and R. Satyavati, Chem.–Eur. J., 2009, 15, 7526–7529.
15 L. Cipolla, E. Forni, J. Jimenez-Barbero and F. Nicotra,
´
Chem.–Eur. J., 2002, 8, 3976–3983.
Scheme 4 Stereoselective synthesis of a carbohydrate fused spirocyclic
1,8-dioxaspiro[5.4]decane system.
E-olefinic aldehyde 42b.23 IHMA reaction of intermediate 42b
via transition state 43 would give carbonyl ester 1024 which
upon hydrolysis will provide spirocyclic lactol 8.
16 The stereochemistry at C7 carbon was assigned based on our
previous experiments: ref. 14a and b.
Encouraged with the above results, we further planned
to extend the methodology towards the synthesis of the 1,8-
dioxaspiro[5.4]decane skeleton. Thus, cyclopropanation of
septanal 44 using Rh2(OAc)4/N2CHCOOMe in CH2Cl2 provided
an inseparable diastereomeric mixture of 1,2-cyclopropane-
carboxylate 45 in 59% yield.25 NBS mediated electrophilic
ring opening of 45 afforded a complex mixture in which TBS
was completely deprotected. Protection of free hydroxyl with
TBS provided compounds 46 and 4726 in a ratio of 3 : 7,
respectively, as an inseparable mixture in 82% yield. Subjecting
this mixture to K2CO3/MeOH, fortunately, provided the
expected diastereomeric mixture of spirocyclic lactol 4827 in
good yield (65%) (Scheme 4).
17 Several organic and inorganic bases were screened for this
reaction out of which K2CO3/MeOH was found to be more
suitable.
18 For
a few unsuccessful IHMA reactions for spirolactones:
(a) T. Honda, H. Mizutani and K. Kanai, J. Org. Chem., 1996,
61, 9374–9378; (b) C. Mukai, S. M. Moharram, S. Azukizawa and
M. Hanaoka, J. Org. Chem., 1997, 62, 8095–8103.
19 C. M. Timmers, M. A. Leeuwenburgh, J. C. Verheijen, G. A. van
der Marel and J. H. van Boom, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 1996, 7,
49–52.
20 The E-configuration was assigned based on the very high chemical
shift value for the olefinic proton.
21 E. J. Corey and M. Ishiguro, Tetrahedron Lett., 1979, 20,
2745–2748.
22 C. A. Grob, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1969, 8, 535–546.
23 For the important role of double-bond geometry in IHMA reactions:
(a) Y. Guindon, F. Soucy, C. Yoakim, W. W. Ogilvie and
L. Plamondon, J. Org. Chem., 2001, 66, 8992–8996; (b) M. Labelle
and Y. Guindon, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1989, 111, 2204–2210.
24 Using 1 equivalent of K2CO3 provided enantiomerically pure
carbonyl ester 10 with substantial amount of spirocyclic lactol 8.
25 No attempts were made to find the stereochemistry at newly
formed stereocenters.
In conclusion, an efficient methodology for the enantio-
selective synthesis of C-spiro-glycosides was developed. This
novel method may provide an easy access to spirocyclic
frameworks with defined stereochemistry.
We thank Department of Science and Technology (DST),
New Delhi, for a FAST track project grant.
26 Formation of 47 provides the evidence for the a,b-unsaturated
ester intermediate in the one-pot IHMA reaction.
27 The formation of a spirocyclic system was confirmed by observing
the a-methylene protons at d 2.65 and d 3.02 in 1H NMR and a
slight down field shift of lactol carbon in 13C NMR (please see the
ESIw spectra).
Notes and references
1 K. C. Nicolaou and H. J. Mitchell, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2001,
40, 1576–1624.
c
758 Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 756–758
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012