10658 J. Am. Chem. Soc., Vol. 119, No. 44, 1997
Cozens et al.
heterolysis of the â-substituent. Since substituents have only a
small effect on benzyl radical stability, the large substituent
effect must be due to stabilization of the positive charge formed
as the heterolysis reaction proceeds to the transition state. Given
that the radical center sits between the phenyl ring and the site
of ionization, the large substituent effect indicates that the
electron-donating stabilizing effect of the phenyl substituent is
transmitted effectively through the radical center and is con-
sistent with electron-donation from the radical center to the
carbon-leaving group bond undergoing heterolysis.
Cation stabilizing groups such as methyl or phenyl attached
directly to the carbon undergoing ionization also play an
important role in determining the overall reaction rate constant.
The â-methyl substituted radicals 2b and 2d undergo heterolysis
with rate constants that are consistently larger than the het-
erolysis rate constants for the corresponding â-unsubstituted
radicals 2a and 2c. The rate acceleration caused by the â-methyl
group can be attributed, at least in part, to the electron-donating
ability of the methyl groups that stabilize the positive charge
formed at the carbon undergoing ionization. It should also be
noted that the oxidation potential of anethole is about 100 mV
lower than that for 4-methoxystyrene,39 indicating that the
presence of the methyl group at the â-position has a substantial
stabilizing effect on the radical cation formed by ionization of
the leaving group. Thus, faster ionization in the presence of
the â-methyl group may also be a reflection of the increased
stability of the radical cation.
The presence of a phenyl group at the â-position has an even
more dramatic effect on the rate constants for ionization than a
methyl group. No ionization of the â-bromophenethyl radical
2f was observed, even in a highly ionizing solvent like HFIP.
On the other hand, the â-chloro- (4a) and the â-bromo (4b)
substituted 1,2-diphenylethyl radicals, which have a phenyl
group at the â-position, undergo rapid ionization. In fact,
heterolysis of bromide from radical 4b was the fastest reaction
measured in the present work, and ionization of chloride from
4a takes place with rate constants of 8.5 × 107 s-1 in 50%
aqueous acetonitrile and 3.9 × 107 s-1 in 50% TFE/50% AcN
that are considerably larger than the rate constants for ionization
of chloride from the 4-methoxyphenethyl and the 4-methox-
yphenyl propyl radicals. Since the oxidation potential for
stilbene40,41 is approximately 100-200 mV higher than the
oxidation potentials of 4-methoxystyrene and anethole, the
relatively faster rate constants for heterolysis to give the stilbene
radical cation cannot be explained solely on the basis of radical
cation stability. Instead, the large rate enhancement must result
from stabilization of the positive charge by the phenyl group
as the heterolysis reaction proceeds to the transition state.
The greater leaving ability of bromide ion relative to chloride
ion in simple SN1 reactions is well-known in physical organic
chemistry. This well-established order is clearly followed for
the reactions of the â-halo radicals studied in the present work,
which shows that in any given solvent mixture, ionization of
the â-bromo radicals takes place with rate constants that are
5-50 times greater than ionization of the corresponding â-chloro
radicals.
Effect of Solvent on Rate Constant for Ionization. Rate
constants for nucleophilic substitution of alkyl halides are
strongly influenced by solvent, with Y parameters for solvent
ionizing ability being derived from the effect of solvent on the
rate constants for rate-limiting ionization of substrates such as
adamantyl derivatives. In general, the rate constants for the
heterolysis of the â-substituted radicals studied in the present
work behave as expected with respect to increasing ionizing
ability of the solvent,42 with heterolysis being fastest in
acetonitrile solutions containing water followed by solutions
containing HFIP and then TFE.43 Interestingly, however, the
magnitude to which the rate constants are influenced by ionizing
ability of the solvent is strongly dependent on the structure of
the radical. For example, the rate constant for the loss of
bromide from the â-bromo-4-methoxyphenylpropyl radical 2d
increases 2.5-fold upon going from 50% TFE/50%AcN to 100%
TFE, whereas the rate constant for the same reaction of the
â-bromo-4-methoxyphenethyl radical 2c increases by almost 20-
fold under identical conditions.
A more accurate assessment of the effect of solvent ionizing
ability on the rate constants for the ionization reaction of the
â-substituted radicals can be obtained from Winstein plots of
the data obtained in methanol/water mixtures. These plots of
the rate constant vs Y values29 for each methanol/water mixture
are shown in Figure 9. All the plots are reasonably linear but
have slopes that change substantially depending on the nature
of the leaving group and the presence or absence of alkyl or
phenyl groups at the â-position. Thus, m ) 0.72 calculated
from the slope of the plot of the rate constant for heterolysis of
the â-chloro-4-methoxyphenethyl radical 2a as a function of Y
is considerably larger than m ) 0.54 from the slope of the same
plot for the corresponding â-bromo-substituted radical 2c.
Similarly, the m value of 0.21 for the heterolysis of the â-chloro-
4-methoxyphenylpropyl radical 2b is slightly larger than the m
value of 0.18 measured for the â-bromo derivative 2d. In
addition, ionization of chloride or bromide from the 4-meth-
oxyphenethyl radicals 2a and 2c to give the 4-methoxystyrene
radical cation is significantly more sensitive to solvent ionizing
ability than formation of the more stable anethole radical cation
produced by ionization of chloride or bromide from the
4-methoxyphenylpropyl radicals 2b and 2d.
This variation in m value can be explained by noting that the
observed rate constants for heterolysis of the carbon-bromine
bond are substantially larger than those for the ionization of
chloride. The higher reactivity for the â-bromo derivatives
indicates an earlier transition state that should be less sensitive
to environmental effects such as solvent polarity. The decrease
in the m value upon addition of a â-methyl group is also
consistent with the higher reactivity and earlier transition state
induced by the cation stabilizing influence of the â-methyl
group.
On the other hand, despite the fact that heterolysis of the
1,2-diphenylethyl radical 4a is more rapid than heterolysis of
the other radicals studied in the present work, it shows
considerable sensitivity to solvent ionizing ability, with m )
0.62. In this case, the positive charge at the carbon undergoing
(38) Note that failure to observe the radical cations from the â-bromo-
4-methylphenethyl radical does not necessarily indicate that ionization is
not taking place. Ionization may be occurring, but, given the higher oxidation
potential of 4-methylstyrene, rapid electron-transfer of the radical cation/
bromide ion pair may take place to give the neutral 4-methylstyrene and a
bromine atom. If this reaction does occur, the initial ionization step would
still be solvent dependent, and the observed decay of the radical would
increase in ionizing solvents. Since the decay of the â-bromo-4-meth-
ylphenethyl radical and the phenyl unsubstituted derivative remained
unchanged upon going from acetonitrile to water, ionization followed by
electron-transfer is not likely to be a dominant process under our conditions.
(39) Workentin, M. S.; Schepp, N. P.; Johnston, L. J.; Wayner, D. D.
M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 1141-1142.
(42) An increased rate constant for â-heterolysis of model compounds
of 4′-DNA radicals upon going from methanol to 1:1 acetonitrile:water has
recently been demonstrated.4
(43) Y(H2O) ) 4.1; Y(HFIP) ) 3.8; Y(TFE) ) 1.8. Y values taken from:
March, J. AdVanced Organic Chemistry, 4th ed.; John Wiley & Sons: New
York, 1992; p 361.
(40) Lewis, F. D.; Bedell, A. M.; Dykstra, R. E.; Elbert, J. E.; Gould, I.
R.; Farid, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 8055-8064.
(41) Lewis, F. D.; Kojima, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 8664-
8670.