had a smaller influence on the rate of reaction; a -OMe
substituent had minimal effect compared to the parent phenyl
system with an 83% yield being achieved after 6 h (entry 4).
para-Methyl and -bromo groups are also well tolerated
delivering the corresponding 1,4-dicarbonyls in 98% and 85%
yield respectively (entries 5 and 6). Exchange of a phenyl for the
more electron rich naphthyl derived imine again showed little
difference with the naphthyl derived adduct being obtained in
86% yield after 6 h reaction (entry 7).
be attempted. Pleasingly, the required tetracarbonyl product 3
was isolated in 76% yield after 6 hours reaction.15
The reason for the rate accelerations observed with the nitro-
and cyano-substituted imines is unclear although destabilisation
of the chelated intermediate is a possibility. Given these rate
accelerations we were interested to see if these more reactive
imines would allow a- and b-substituted acrylate esters to be
employed as substrates. Unfortunately, although a rate accelera-
tion was observed little difference in yield was obtained, with
the nitro-substituted imine delivering products from reaction
with methyl crotonate and methyl methacrylate in only 22% and
14% yield respectively.
In conclusion, we have demonstrated the general viability of
the intermolecular hydroacylation of acrylate esters as a new
regioselective route to 1,4-dicarbonyl systems. The imine
component of the reaction can tolerate a range of substituents
including electron donating and electron withdrawing groups.
The enoate component can contain a variety of ester groups as
well as amide functionalities with little effect on yield, however,
introduction of simple a- or -substituents reduces the efficiency
of the reactions. Efforts to expand the substrate tolerance, to
identify more efficient catalyst systems and to develop a process
that can utilise aldehydes directly are underway in our
laboratory and will be reported in due course.
The use of diimine 2, prepared in good yield from benzene-
1,4-dicarboxaldehyde, offers a potential starting point for two
directional synthesis14 and allowed a double hydroacylation to
a
Table 2 Reaction between 1 and various alkenes using RhCl(PPh3)3
Yield
The EPSRC are thanked for financial support of this project.
We also thank the EPSRC Mass Spectrometry service at the
University of Wales, Swansea, for analyses and Johnson
Matthey PLC for the loan of rhodium salts.
Entry
Alkene
Product
Time/h
(%)
1
2
3
X = OMe
X = OtBu
X = NMe2
R1 = R2 = H
R1 = R2 = H
R1 = R2 = H
6
6
6
73
71
74
Notes and references
1 J. M. O’Connor and M. Junning, J. Org. Chem., 1992, 57, 5075.
2 For leading refs, see: (a) R. W. Barnhart, D. A. McMorran and B.
Bosnich, Inorg. Chim. Acta, 1997, 263, 1; (b) B. Bosnich, Acc. Chem.
Res., 1998, 31, 667; (c) M. Fujio, M. Tanaka, X.-M. Wu, K. Funakoshi,
K. Sakai and H. Suemune, Chem. Lett., 1998, 881.
3 For examples, see: A. D. Aloise, M. E. Layton and M. D. Shair, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2000, 122, 12610; K. P. Gable and G. A. Benz, Tetrahedron
Lett., 1991, 32, 3473.
4 For leading refs, see: H. Lee and C.-H. Jun, Bull. Korean Chem. Soc.,
1995, 16, 66; C. P. Lenges, P. S. White and M. Brookhart, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 1998, 120, 6965; T. Kondo, M. Akazome, Y. Tsuji and Y.
Watanabe, J. Org. Chem., 1990, 55, 1286; T. Kondo, N. Hiraishi, Y.
Morisaki, K. Wada, Y. Watanabe and T.-A. Mitsudo, Organometallics,
1998, 17, 2131.
R1 = Me, R2 = H
X = OMe
4
18
12
12
6
24
10
16
81
R1 = Ph, R2 = H
X = OMe
5
R1 = H, R2 = Me
X = OMe
6
7b
5 C.-H. Jun, D.-Y. Lee, H. Lee and J.-B. Hong, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.,
2000, 39, 3070.
6 J. W. Suggs, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1979, 101, 489.
7 W. Friedrichsen, ‘Furans and their benzo derivatives: synthesis’, in
Compr. Heterocycl. Chem. II, ed. C. W. Bird, Elsevier, Oxford, 1996.
8 E.-I. Negishi and M. Kotora, Tetrahedron, 1997, 53, 6707.
9 R. E. Babine and S. L. Bender, Chem. Rev., 1997, 97, 1359.
10 D. Seebach, Angew. Chem., 1979, 91, 259; Umpoled Synthons. A Survey
of Sources and Uses in Synthesis, ed. T. A. Hase, Wiley, New York,
1987.
a Conditions: imine 1 (1.0 eq.), alkene (2.0 eq), THF, 135 °C, sealed tube,
RhCl(PPh3)3 (10 mol%) followed by HCl (1.0 M). b Product isolated as
enamine. pic = 3-picolin-2-yl.
Table 3 Variation in imine substituenta
11 For examples, see: G. Fremy, E. Monflier, J.-F. Carpentier, Y. Castanet
and A. Mortreux, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1995, 34, 1474; C. W.
Lee and H. Alper, J. Org. Chem., 1995, 60, 499; Y. Hu, W. Chen, A. M.
B. Osuna, J. Xiao, A. M. Stuart and E. G. Hope, Chem. Commun., 2001,
725.
Entry
R
Time/h
Yield (%)
12 For an example of an intramolecular hydroacylation of an acrylate ester
see ref. 2(a).
13 All new compounds have been characterised, see ESI for details.†
14 For a review, see: S. R. Magnuson, Tetrahedron, 1995, 51, 2167.
15 The preparation of 3 serves as a general procedure: a solution of imine
2 (282 mg, 1.79 mmol) in THF (1 mL) was added to a solution of
RhCl(PPh3)3 (167 mg, 10 mol %) in THF (1 mL) at room temperature
and stirred for 1 h. Methyl acrylate (480 mL, 5.37 mmol) in THF (2 mL)
was added and the reaction vessel flushed with argon. The reaction tube
was sealed and then heated at 135 °C for 6 h. The reaction was cooled
to room temperature, diluted with EtOAc (20 mL), poured into aqueous
HCl (1 M, 20 mL) and extracted with EtOAc (3 3 20 mL). The organic
portions were washed with brine (20 mL), dried (MgSO4) and
evaporated in vacuo. The residue was purified by flash chromatography
(SiO2, 25% EtOAc–petrol) to give 3 (212 mg, 76%) as pale yellow
plates.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
X = H
6 h
73
80
80
83
98
85
86
X = NO2
X = CN
X = OMe
X = Me
X = Br
20 min
80 min
6 h
6 h
6 h
6 h
a Conditions: imine (1.0 eq.), methyl acrylate (2.0 eq), THF, 135 °C, sealed
tube, RhCl(PPh3)3 (10 mol%) followed by HCl (1.0 M).
Chem. Commun., 2001, 2558–2559
2559